The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
W4-11: A high-confidence benchmark dataset for computational thermochemistry derived from first-principles W4 data
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We show that the purely first-principles Weizmann-4 (W4) computational thermochemistry method developed in our group can reproduce available Active Thermochemical Tables atomization energies for 35 molecules with a 3σ uncertainty of under 1 kJ/mol. We then employ this method to generate the W4-11 dataset of 140 total atomization energies of small first-and second-row molecules and radicals. These cover a broad spectrum of bonding situations and multireference character, and as such are an excellent, quasi-automated benchmark (available electronically as Supporting information ) for parametrization and validation of more approximate methods (such as DFT functionals and composite methods). Secondary contributions such as relativity can be included or omitted at will, unlike with experimental data. A broad variety of more approximate methods is assessed against the W4-11 benchmark and recommendations are made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Willmott, C., & Matsuura, K. (2005) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr030079 · Cited by 6,512
Quantitative quantum chemistry
Helgaker, T., Klopper, W., & Tew, D. P. (2008) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268970802258591 · Cited by 255
Cited by
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2017) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 · Cited by 2,307
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Nandy, A., Duan, C., Taylor, M. G., Liu, F., Steeves, A. H., & Kulik, H. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00347 · Cited by 358
Najibi, A., & Goerigk, L. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00842 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Karton, A., Daon, S., & Martin, J. M. L.
- Venue
- Chemical Physics Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 510
- Issue
- 4-6
- Pages
- 165-178
- ISSN
- 0009-2614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050858126
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: W4-11: A high-confidence benchmark dataset for computational thermochemistry derived from first-principles W4 data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cplett.2011.05.007
- The paper
- Karton, A., Daon, S., & Martin, J. M. L. (2011). W4-11: A high-confidence benchmark dataset for computational thermochemistry derived from first-principles W4 data. Chemical Physics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2011.05.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.