Cited by 34biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesPolymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation

Mechanical properties of PLA/PCL blends crosslinked by electron beam and TAIC additive

Malinowski, Rafał·2016·Chemical Physics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cplett.2016.09.022

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malinowski, R.
Affiliations
Łukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Polymer Materials (PL)
Corresponding author
Malinowski, Rafał
Venue
Chemical Physics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
662
Pages
91-96
ISSN
0009-2614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520433829
Cited by
34
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (DEC-2012/07/D/ST8/02773)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
Keywords
polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polymer blends, electron beam crosslinking, triallyl isocyanurate, mechanical properties, phase separation, impact strength, tensile strength, elastic modulus, radiation effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review