Cited by 295Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEducation Discipline and Inequality

Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies

Ferguson, Christopher J.·2013·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Social scientists continue to debate the impact of spanking and corporal punishment (CP) on negative child outcomes including externalizing and internalizing behavior problems and cognitive performance. Previous meta-analytic reviews have mixed long- and short-term studies and relied on bivariate r, which may inflate effect sizes. The current meta-analysis focused on longitudinal studies, and compared effects using bivariate r and better controlled partial r coefficients controlling for time-1 outcome variables. Consistent with previous findings, results based on bivariate r found small but non-trivial long-term relationships between spanking/CP use and negative outcomes. Spanking and CP correlated .14 and .18 respectively with externalizing problems, .12 and .21 with internalizing problems and -.09 and -.18 with cognitive performance. However, when better controlled partial r coefficients (pr) were examined, results were statistically significant but trivial (at or below pr = .10) for externalizing (.07 for spanking, .08 for CP) and internalizing behaviors (.10 for spanking, insufficient studies for CP) and near the threshold of trivial for cognitive performance (-.11 for CP, insufficient studies for spanking). It is concluded that the impact of spanking and CP on the negative outcomes evaluated here (externalizing, internalizing behaviors and low cognitive performance) are minimal. It is advised that psychologists take a more nuanced approach in discussing the effects of sp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.11.002

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harsher forms of physical punishment were more strongly associated with negative child outcomes than ordinary spanking.

    “Taken together, these meta-analyses provide evidence that physical punishment is associated with negative child outcomes, particularly when the outcomes are divided into finer-grained categories (Ferguson, 2013; Gershoff, 2002) rather than when they are grouped into broad categories (Paolucci & Violato, 2004), and that harsher methods of physical punishment are more strongly associated with”

    From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013

  • The four earlier meta-analyses of physical punishment used different article sets and reached inconsistent conclusions: Gershoff (2002) found it largely ineffective and harmful, Larzelere and Kuhn (2005) found it effective under some circumstances, and Ferguson (2013) and Paolucci and Violato (2004) found only modest links to cognitive, emotional, and behavioral problems.

    “Each of these four meta-analyses included a different set of articles and came to varied conclusions, namely that physical punishment is largely ineffective and harmful (Gershoff, 2002), that physical punishment is effective under certain circumstances (Larzelere & Kuhn, 2005), and that physical punishment is linked with children’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioral problems but only modestly (F”

    From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013

  • Two main criticisms of past meta-analyses were that spanking had been confounded with potentially abusive parenting in some studies and that spanking had been linked to detrimental outcomes only in methodologically weak studies.

    “Two primary concerns that have been raised about past meta-analyses are that spanking has been confounded with potentially abusive parenting behaviors in some studies and that spanking has only been linked with detrimental outcomes in methodologically weak studies (Baumrind, Larzelere, & Cowan, 2002; Ferguson, 2013; Larzelere & Kuhn, 2005).”

    From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013

  • Across the earlier meta-analyses, physical punishment was associated with negative child outcomes, especially when outcomes were analyzed in finer-grained categories rather than broad ones.

    “Taken together, these meta-analyses provide evidence that physical punishment is associated with negative child outcomes, particularly when the outcomes are divided into finer-grained categories (Ferguson, 2013; Gershoff, 2002) rather than when they are grouped into broad categories (Paolucci & Violato, 2004), and that harsher methods of physical punishment are more strongly associated with”

    From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013

  • A major concern is that reliance on cross-sectional designs may mask child-elicitation effects, where difficult children elicit more spanking rather than spanking causing problematic behavior.

    “A major concern raised about the spanking literature in general and previous meta-analyses in particular is that their reliance on cross-sectional designs may mask what are truly child-elicitation effects (Baumrind et al., 2002; Ferguson, 2013; Larzelere et al., 2004). In other words, associations between spanking and problematic behavior may reflect the fact that difficult children elicit more sp”

    From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, C. J.
Affiliations
Texas A&M International University (US)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Christopher J.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
196-208
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983413501
Cited by
295
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
Keywords
spanking, corporal punishment, child discipline, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, cognitive performance, long-term child outcomes, effect size interpretation, longitudinal associations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Aggression, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Punishment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review