Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies
Abstract
Social scientists continue to debate the impact of spanking and corporal punishment (CP) on negative child outcomes including externalizing and internalizing behavior problems and cognitive performance. Previous meta-analytic reviews have mixed long- and short-term studies and relied on bivariate r, which may inflate effect sizes. The current meta-analysis focused on longitudinal studies, and compared effects using bivariate r and better controlled partial r coefficients controlling for time-1 outcome variables. Consistent with previous findings, results based on bivariate r found small but non-trivial long-term relationships between spanking/CP use and negative outcomes. Spanking and CP correlated .14 and .18 respectively with externalizing problems, .12 and .21 with internalizing problems and -.09 and -.18 with cognitive performance. However, when better controlled partial r coefficients (pr) were examined, results were statistically significant but trivial (at or below pr = .10) for externalizing (.07 for spanking, .08 for CP) and internalizing behaviors (.10 for spanking, insufficient studies for CP) and near the threshold of trivial for cognitive performance (-.11 for CP, insufficient studies for spanking). It is concluded that the impact of spanking and CP on the negative outcomes evaluated here (externalizing, internalizing behaviors and low cognitive performance) are minimal. It is advised that psychologists take a more nuanced approach in discussing the effects of sp…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Harsher forms of physical punishment were more strongly associated with negative child outcomes than ordinary spanking.
“Taken together, these meta-analyses provide evidence that physical punishment is associated with negative child outcomes, particularly when the outcomes are divided into finer-grained categories (Ferguson, 2013; Gershoff, 2002) rather than when they are grouped into broad categories (Paolucci & Violato, 2004), and that harsher methods of physical punishment are more strongly associated with”
From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013
The four earlier meta-analyses of physical punishment used different article sets and reached inconsistent conclusions: Gershoff (2002) found it largely ineffective and harmful, Larzelere and Kuhn (2005) found it effective under some circumstances, and Ferguson (2013) and Paolucci and Violato (2004) found only modest links to cognitive, emotional, and behavioral problems.
“Each of these four meta-analyses included a different set of articles and came to varied conclusions, namely that physical punishment is largely ineffective and harmful (Gershoff, 2002), that physical punishment is effective under certain circumstances (Larzelere & Kuhn, 2005), and that physical punishment is linked with children’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioral problems but only modestly (F”
From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013
Two main criticisms of past meta-analyses were that spanking had been confounded with potentially abusive parenting in some studies and that spanking had been linked to detrimental outcomes only in methodologically weak studies.
“Two primary concerns that have been raised about past meta-analyses are that spanking has been confounded with potentially abusive parenting behaviors in some studies and that spanking has only been linked with detrimental outcomes in methodologically weak studies (Baumrind, Larzelere, & Cowan, 2002; Ferguson, 2013; Larzelere & Kuhn, 2005).”
From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013
Across the earlier meta-analyses, physical punishment was associated with negative child outcomes, especially when outcomes were analyzed in finer-grained categories rather than broad ones.
“Taken together, these meta-analyses provide evidence that physical punishment is associated with negative child outcomes, particularly when the outcomes are divided into finer-grained categories (Ferguson, 2013; Gershoff, 2002) rather than when they are grouped into broad categories (Paolucci & Violato, 2004), and that harsher methods of physical punishment are more strongly associated with”
From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013
A major concern is that reliance on cross-sectional designs may mask child-elicitation effects, where difficult children elicit more spanking rather than spanking causing problematic behavior.
“A major concern raised about the spanking literature in general and previous meta-analyses in particular is that their reliance on cross-sectional designs may mask what are truly child-elicitation effects (Baumrind et al., 2002; Ferguson, 2013; Larzelere et al., 2004). In other words, associations between spanking and problematic behavior may reflect the fact that difficult children elicit more sp”
From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Ferguson, 2013
Cites
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955 · see citing works
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505 · see citing works
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · see citing works
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542 · see citing works
An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers.
Ferguson, C. J. (2009) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0015808 · Cited by 3,467 · see citing works
Self-citationA Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905 · Cited by 2,955 · see citing works
Gershoff, E. T. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.539 · Cited by 2,165 · see citing works
A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis
Orwin, R. G. (1983) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164923 · Cited by 2,064 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Corporal punishment was operationalized as consisting of a wider range of generally more serious acts, including pushing, shoving, hitting with an object, or striking the face, yet generally falling short of physically injurious or life threatening acts of violence.”
BackgroundMethodMeta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59 · Cited by 1,780 · see citing works
Kraemer, H. C., Stice, E., Kazdin, A., Offord, D., & Kupfer, D. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.848 · Cited by 1,712 · see citing works
On the Use of Beta Coefficients in Meta-Analysis.
Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
<i>meta-analysis</i> bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374 · see citing works
A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis
Macaskill, P., Walter, S. D., & Irwig, L. (2001) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.698 · Cited by 1,286 · see citing works
The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
Steiner, P. M., Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Clark, M. H. (2010) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0018719 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer.
Bem, D. J., & Honorton, C. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.4 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Excessive reassurance seeking, depression, and interpersonal rejection: A meta-analytic review.
Starr, L. R., & Davila, J. (2008) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013866 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pinquart, M. (2017) · Developmental psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000295 · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses.
Gershoff, E. T., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2016) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/fam0000191 · Cited by 931 · see citing works
“Several efforts have been made to synthesize this large body of research, first in narrative form (Becker, 1964; Larzelere, 1996; Steinmetz, 1979; Straus, 2001) and later through meta-analyses (Ferguson, 2013; Gershoff, 2002; Larzelere & Kuhn, 2005; Paolucci & Violato, 2004).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDerella, O. J., Burke, J. D., Stepp, S. D., & Hipwell, A. E. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2019.1603109 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ferguson, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M International University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ferguson, Christopher J.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 196-208
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983413501
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Keywords
- spanking, corporal punishment, child discipline, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, cognitive performance, long-term child outcomes, effect size interpretation, longitudinal associations
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Aggression, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Punishment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review