CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 678Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbusePersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 184 of the 187 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender differences in the prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury: A meta-analysis

Bresin, Konrad, Schoenleber, Michelle·2015·Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Epidemiological research on the prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) has found inconsistent results in terms of gender differences, with some studies showing a higher prevalence for women compared to men and other studies showing no difference. The goal of the current study was to use meta-analytic techniques to better conceptualize the presence and size of gender differences in the prevalence of NSSI. We also examined two factors proposed to explain gender differences in NSSI prevalence: the gender difference would be larger for clinical samples relative to community samples, and the gender difference would be larger for younger (versus older) samples. The results showed that across studies women were significantly more likely to report a history of NSSI than men. Moderator analyses showed that the gender difference was larger for clinical samples, compared to college/community samples. However, there was not a significant relation between age and effect size. Women were more likely to use some methods of NSSI (e.g., cutting) compared to men, but for other methods there was no significant difference (e.g., punching). These results increase our knowledge of NSSI and fit with a larger literature examining gender, emotion regulation, and psychopathology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.009

Cites

184 of 184 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 187 references

3 of the 187 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bresin, 2013, Changes in negative affect following pain (vs. nonpainful) stimulation in individuals with and without a history of nonsuicidal self-injury, Personality disorders: Theory, research, and treatment, 4, 62, 10.1037/a0025736 · DOI
  2. Gratz, 2001, Measurement of deliberate self-harm: Preliminary data on the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 4, 253, 10.1023/A:1012779403943 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Jacobson, 2008, Psychiatric impairment among adolescents engaging in different types of deliberate self-harm, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 363, 10.1080/15374410801955771 · DOI
  4. Klonsky, 2013, Deliberate self-harm in a nonclinical population: Prevalence and psychological correlates, American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1501, 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.8.1501 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Laye-Gindhu, 2005, Nonsuicidal self-harm among community adolescents: Understanding the “whats” and “whys” of self-harm, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 447, 10.1007/s10964-005-7262-z · DOI · Paper page
  6. Muehlenkamp, 2007, Risk for suicide attempts among adolescents who engage in non-suicidal self-injury, Archives of Suicide Research, 11, 69, 10.1080/13811110600992902 · DOI
  7. Nixon, 2002, Affect regulation and addictive aspects of repetitive, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1333
  8. Nock, 2004, A functional approach to the assessment of self-mutilative behavior, Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 72, 885, 10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.885 · DOI
  9. Plener, 2009, An international comparison of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicide attempts: Germany and the USA, Psychological Medicine, 39, 1549, 10.1017/S0033291708005114 · DOI
  10. Selby, 2012, Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) disorder: A preliminary study, Personality disorders: Theory, research, treatment, 3, 167, 10.1037/a0024405 · DOI
  11. Serras, 2010, Self-injury, substance use, and associated risk factors in a multi-campus probability sample of college students, Addictive Behaviors, 24, 119, 10.1037/a0017210 · DOI
  12. Sornberger, 2012, Nonsuicidal self-injury and gender: Patterns of prevalence, methods, and locations among adolescents, Suicide and life threatening behavior, 42, 266, 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2012.0088.x · DOI
  13. Whitlock, 2011, Nonsuicidal self-injury in a college population: General trends and sex differences, Journal of American College Health, 59, 691, 10.1080/07448481.2010.529626 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 678

Related

Metadata

Authors
Bresin, K., & Schoenleber, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bresin, Konrad
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
38
Pages
55-64
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.009
OpenAlex
W2082437850
Cited by
678
References
187
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, gender differences, prevalence, women, clinical versus community samples, age differences, self-injury methods, cuttings, emotion regulation, psychopathology
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Prevalence, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review