Cited by 1,166Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

Measurement of Deliberate Self-Harm: Preliminary Data on the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory

Gratz, Kim L.·2001·Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1012779403943

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gratz, K. L.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
Gratz, Kim L.
Venue
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Published
2001-12
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
253-263
ISSN
  • 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
  • 0882-2689
  • 1573-3505
OpenAlex
W2167019091
Cited by
1,166
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 76
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
self-harm, psychometric validation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review