The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attachment measures in middle childhood and adolescence: A systematic review of measurement properties
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Attachment theory proposes that humans develop representations of self and other in early childhood which are relatively stable across the life-course, and play a key role in psychological adaptation. However, to date, the psychometric properties of attachment measures in middle childhood and adolescence have not been evaluated in a systematic review. METHOD: A systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017057772) was conducted using COSMIN criteria. Two researchers independently searched MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Embase databases for relevant articles. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies were included in the review. The methodological quality of studies was typically fair or poor, with only a small number of studies being rated as of good or excellent quality. The measurement properties of attachment measures in this age group were frequently rated as inadequate according to COSMIN criteria. The Child Attachment Interview (CAI) has the best psychometric properties of the interview and projective measures, and the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA) the best evidence of the self-report measures. Overall, the evidence for the CAI and IPPA included both positive and negative findings relating to adequacy of measurement properties. CONCLUSIONS: Attachment measures in middle childhood and adolescence currently have limited evidence for the adequacy of their psychometric properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, although Jewell et al. [43] see the ECR as an appropriate instrument for the assessment of attachment in young people, they also state that this construct is difficult to measure in adolescence and necessitate the use of developmentally adapted measures.”
From Get secure soon: attachment in abused adolescents and young adults before and after trauma-focused cognitive processing therapy. (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
(1969) · Cited by 18,340
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,570
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247
The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958) · Basic Books · doi:10.1037/10034-000 · Cited by 4,607
(1998) · Cited by 3,968
Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2018) · doi:10.4324/9780429471643 · Cited by 3,886
Self-citationHandbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-4135 · Cited by 3,819
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20087 · Cited by 1,377 · cited 1×
“‘Attachment and affiliation’ are already included in the Research Domains Criteria (Cuthbert, 2014), and in our view this presents an opportunity to advance the measurement of attachment across the lifespan.”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nielsen, P., Favez, N., & Rigter, H. (2020) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-020-00320-0 · Cited by 135
Wittkowski, A., Vatter, S., Muhinyi, A., Garrett, C., & Henderson, M. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101906 · Cited by 121
Baudinet, J., Simic, M., Griffiths, H., Donnelly, C., Stewart, C. S., & Goddard, E. (2020) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-020-00338-9 · Cited by 64
“The ASQ has been used with adults and adolescents [67].”
MethodSelf-citationCortés‐García, L., Takkouche, B., Rodríguez‐Cano, R., & Senra, C. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.082 · Cited by 48
White, L., Schulz, C. C., Schoett, M. J. S., Kungl, M., Keil, J., Borelli, J., & Vrtička, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.517372 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Jewell, T., Gardner, T., Susi, K., Watchorn, K., Coopey, E., Simic, M., Fonagy, P., & Eisler, I.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Anna Freud Centre (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jewell, Tom
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 71-82
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2906720146
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowship (CDRF-2014-05-024)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- attachment, psychometric properties, middle childhood, adolescence, Child Attachment Interview, Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment, self-report measures, projective techniques
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Object Attachment, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
