The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 51 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The relationship between acceptance of cancer and distress: A meta-analytic review
Open accessAbstract
Acceptance of cancer has long been recognized as playing a critical role in psychological adjustment to the illness, but its associations with distress outcomes have not been quantitatively reviewed. Informed by coping theory and third wave conceptualizations of acceptance, we first propose an integrated model of acceptance of cancer. Then we examine the strength of the relationships between acceptance of cancer and general and cancer-specific distress in cancer patients and potential moderators of these relationships. CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and Web of Science databases were searched. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted on 78 records (N=15,448). Small-to-moderate, negative, and significant relationships were found between acceptance of cancer and general distress (r=−.31; 95% CI:−.36 to −.26, k=75); cancer-specific distress (r=−.18; 95% CI:−.21 to −.14, k=13); depressive symptoms (r=−.25; 95% CI:−.31 to −.19, k=41); and anxiety symptoms (r=−.22; 95% CI:−.30 to −.15, k=29). Age, marital status, and stage of cancer were identified as significant moderators. Findings suggest that acceptance of cancer may be important to target in interventions to reduce general and cancer-specific distress in cancer patients. Future research should focus on developing multifaceted measures of acceptance and identifying theory-based psychological and social processes that lead to greater acceptance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 51 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“anxiety symptoms (r=−.22; 95% CI:−.30 to −.15, k=29)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Age, marital status, and stage of cancer were identified as significant moderators.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“depressive symptoms (r=−.25; 95% CI:−.31 to −.19, k=41)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“depressive symptoms (r = −.25, p < .0001)”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“We found significant, small to moderate, negative relationships between acceptance of cancer and general distress, cancer-specific distress, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Mean Effect Sizes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“cancer-specific distress (r=−.18; 95% CI:−.21 to −.14, k=13)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Small-to-moderate, negative, and significant relationships were found between acceptance of cancer and general distress (r=−.31; 95% CI:−.36 to −.26, k=75)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Heterogeneity analyses demonstrated significant between-study variance in the relationships between acceptance of cancer and general distress (Q = 873.24; I2 = .91; τ2 = .06)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Based on stem-and-leaf plots, one study (Lyons et al., 2015) was identified as an outlier for the association between acceptance of cancer and depressive symptoms.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Mean Effect Sizes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lyons et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Age, marital status, and stage of cancer were identified as significant moderators.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Age, marital status, and stage of cancer were identified as significant moderators.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 35
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, most of the studies were conducted in the United States, and the majority of participants were married middle-aged Caucasian women.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“cancer-specific distress (ps = .279, .748, and .667, respectively)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Publication Bias
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“or anxiety (ps = .335, .322, and .338, respectively).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Publication Bias
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“as well as anxiety symptoms (b = .006, SE = .003, z = 2.08, 95% CI .000 to .011; k = 20)”
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
“and the relationship between acceptance of cancer and anxiety symptoms weakened by 0.006.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Acceptance of cancer was more strongly correlated with depressive and anxiety symptoms among cancer patients with early-stage disease; however, this finding was not replicated when examining general distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cancer stage was a significant moderator of the relationships between acceptance of cancer and depressive symptoms (b = .004, SE = .002, z = 2.59, 95% CI .001 to .007; k = 18)”
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
“For each percent increase in advanced-stage cancer patients in the sample, associations between acceptance of cancer and both depressive and anxiety symptoms weakened by 0.004.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, there was minimal heterogeneity in the relationship between acceptance of cancer and cancer-specific distress (Q = 12.76; I2 = .00; τ2 = .00); therefore, we did not conduct moderation analyses for this association.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“depressive symptoms (ps = .235, .773, and .342, respectively)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Publication Bias
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“publication status (i.e., published vs. not published), year of data collection, and study reporting quality did not significantly moderate the associations between acceptance of cancer and general distress (ps = .429, .544, and .059, respectively)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Publication Bias
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a small minority of studies reported how sample size was determined (reported in 5.13%, 4/78)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Study Reporting Quality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Marital status (i.e., percent of patients married/partnered) was a significant moderator of the relationships between acceptance of cancer and depressive symptoms (b = .007, SE = .003, z = 2.43, 95% CI .001 to .012; k = 26)”
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
“For each percent increase in married/partnered patients in the sample, the relationship between acceptance of cancer and depressive symptoms weakened by 0.007”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, few authors using the COPE or Brief COPE reported whether the instructions were revised to refer to acceptance of cancer-specific stressors.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“reasons for non-participation (23.08%, 18/78)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Study Reporting Quality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although all of our results were small to moderate effect sizes, acceptance of cancer had the smallest association with cancer-specific distress, the largest association with general distress, and similar small associations with anxiety and depressive symptoms.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When reliability coefficients were not reported in the study, the median reliability coefficients of the measures were imputed based on those reported in the sample. For single-item measures, a reliability coefficient of .60 was imputed (Hunter & Schimdt, 2004; Sharma & Yetton, 2007).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Meta-analytic Method
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hunter & Schimdt, 2004
- Not checked yetcites Sharma & Yetton, 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“studies have shown that greater acceptance of cancer is related to reduced symptoms of cancer-specific distress, depression, and anxiety; however, effect sizes for these relationships vary from small to large”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Introduction > Present Study: Acceptance of Cancer and Distress
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“by accepting the illness to a greater degree, patients are empowered to engage in value-based actions, which might subsequently improve psychological well-being.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Introduction > Acceptance of Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hayes et al., 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The quality of study reporting was assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (von Elm, Altman, & Egger, 2008).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Quality Assessment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites von Elm, Altman, & Egger, 2008 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effect sizes were considered statistically significant for p-values < .05.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Meta-analytic Method
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first author (ES) screened all of the titles and abstracts and, when found eligible, the full-texts; the second author (DBT) screened 20% of the titles and abstracts and 20% of the full-texts. Any discrepancies were resolved through consensus meetings.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman, 2009).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Literature Search
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman, 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent reviews suggest that among cancer patients, mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions lead to significant moderate to large improvement in emotional well-being and quality of life as well as moderate to large reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms and traumatic stress responses”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Introduction > Present Study: Acceptance of Cancer and Distress
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In accordance with Hunter and Schmidt (2004), meta-analyses were conducted with raw correlations (r) and correlations corrected for measurement reliability (ρ).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Meta-analytic Method
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hunter and Schmidt (2004)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Sensitivity analyses conducted excluding this study did not yield statistically significant differences in the results; thus, the study was included in the final analyses (Lipsey & Wilson, 2001).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Mean Effect Sizes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lipsey & Wilson, 2001
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 3,507 records were excluded with 95.3% agreement between raters (Cohen’s kappa = .72).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interrater agreement for study reporting quality was 91.4% (Cohen’s kappa = .81).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Quality Assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first author (ES) conducted the initial coding, and the second author (DBT) coded the information reported in 20% of the selected full-texts. There was 94.8% interrater agreement for coding (Cohen’s kappa = .89).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Coding
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, validated self-report measures of distress were selected a priori, and additional measures found during the database search were included if they had acceptable psychometric properties.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent reviews suggest that among cancer patients, mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions lead to significant moderate to large improvement in emotional well-being and quality of life as well as moderate to large reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms and traumatic stress responses”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Introduction > Present Study: Acceptance of Cancer and Distress
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As part of the inclusion criteria, validated self-report measures of acceptance of cancer were selected a priori.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was 92.6% interrater agreement for full-text screening (Cohen’s kappa = .79).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“additional measures were included if they assessed acceptance in line with our conceptual definition (i.e., recognizing and staying present with the reality of the diagnosis rather than engaging in resignation or fatalism), and if they had acceptable psychometric properties, including reliability (i.e., Cronbach’s alpha ≥ .70) and validity evidence”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For longitudinal and intervention studies, only the initial (or baseline) acceptance of cancer and general and/or cancer-specific distress correlation coefficients were extracted in order to include the largest possible sample and minimize the effects of extraneous factors (e.g., intervention, practice effects).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Coding
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As advanced-stage cancer patients were underrepresented in the analyses, the results should be interpreted with caution.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alternatively, our null moderation findings for gender may be due to the limited representation of male cancer patients in the analyses.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, as in previous reviews, our meta-analytic results may be affected by publication bias (i.e., the file drawer problem). However, we attempted to minimize this limitation by including unpublished results (e.g., dissertations, conference abstracts), and analyses of publication bias suggested that this was not a significant concern.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings should be cautiously interpreted, as both younger and older adults were underrepresented in the studies.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Marital status can be considered a proxy variable for enhanced social support, which appears to influence patients’ choice of coping strategies (Holland & Holahan, 2003; Kim, Han, Shaw, McTavish, & Gustafson, 2010) and, in turn, influence distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holland & Holahan, 2003 source
- Not checked yetcites Kim, Han, Shaw, McTavish, & Gustafson, 2010
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, as in prior reviews, our analysis of study reporting quality showed that many researchers did not report information such as the determination of sample size or reasons for non-participation, thereby lowering their reporting quality and limiting our ability to evaluate their research procedures.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, current measures do not assess acceptance of cancer-specific stressors, such as the prospect of death, changes in physical appearance, and role changes, which may be more strongly associated with cancer-specific distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is likely that many patients considered their cancer experience when completing these measures, as the original instructions focus on coping with stressful life events.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Time since diagnosis did not significantly moderate the relationships between acceptance of cancer and general distress, anxiety, or depressive symptoms, suggesting that acceptance may be equally important at different phases of the cancer trajectory.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When partner support is absent, coping strategies such as acceptance might be more important for reducing distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent reviews of studies with primarily healthy adults found promising evidence that changes in acceptance, mindfulness, rumination, worry, and self-compassion are potential mechanisms underlying the mental health benefits of mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions (Alsubaie et al., 2017; Gu, Strauss, Bond, & Cavanagh, 2015).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Implications for Clinical Practice and Intervention Research
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our mixed findings might reflect the variable quality of marital relationships, as being in an unsatisfying marriage might undermine mental health to a greater extent than being single or divorced (Thomas, Liu, & Umberson, 2017; K. Williams, 2003).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thomas, Liu, & Umberson, 2017
- Not checked yetcites K. Williams, 2003 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a number of our moderation findings were mixed and limited by the small sample sizes for certain subgroups. Thus, recommendations regarding the targeting or tailoring of acceptance-based interventions to cancer patient subgroups are premature.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Implications for Clinical Practice and Intervention Research
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Additionally, given that many cancer patients do not have an accurate perception of their disease stage (Applebaum et al., 2014), stage of cancer as identified from medical charts might not be an appropriate proxy variable for patients’ understanding of their prognosis.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Applebaum et al., 2014 source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, information regarding time since diagnosis was limited and long-term cancer survivors were underrepresented in our analyses.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We contend that acceptance of cancer may be a multifaceted construct (e.g., acceptance of death, changes in physical appearance, reduced self-sufficiency).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, in order to maximize the sample sizes and reduce the impact of third variables, all of our analyses were based on baseline correlational data. Thus, we cannot infer directionality and change over time in the acceptance of cancer-distress relationships.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“First, most of the included measures of cancer-specific distress assessed cancer-related post-traumatic stress symptoms, which tend to be endorsed at low levels compared to fear of recurrence and general distress (Abbey et al., 2015).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Abbey et al., 2015 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, pilot findings suggest that ACT leads to significant improvement in acceptance and reductions in distress outcomes in cancer patients (Fashler et al., 2018; Hulbert-Williams et al., 2015).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Implications for Clinical Practice and Intervention Research
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, our findings in combination with these trial results suggest that acceptance of cancer-related experiences might be targeted in interventions aiming to improve mental health in cancer patients.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Implications for Clinical Practice and Intervention Research
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also found preliminary evidence that acceptance of cancer might have a greater impact on the mental health of older age groups, singles, and those with early-stage disease.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Consistent with our integrated model of acceptance based on coping theory (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) and third wave theories (Hayes et al., 1999; Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Linehan, 1993; Segal et al., 2002), we found that greater acceptance of cancer was related to reduced distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lazarus & Folkman, 1984
- Not checked yetcites Hayes et al., 1999
- Not checked yetcites Kabat-Zinn, 1990
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Before this review, the link between acceptance of cancer and distress outcomes had not been quantitatively synthesized.
“its associations with distress outcomes have not been quantitatively reviewed”
The paper relies on this without support.
Acceptance of cancer has a critical role in psychological adjustment to cancer.
“Acceptance of cancer has long been recognized as playing a critical role in psychological adjustment to the illness”
The paper relies on this without support.
Variation in effect sizes may come from differences in sample characteristics and acceptance measures across studies.
“Differences in sample characteristics and measures of acceptance across studies may contribute to this variability in effect sizes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some demographic and medical subgroups of cancer patients may benefit more mentally from acceptance.
“Certain demographic and medical subgroups of cancer patients might experience greater mental health benefits from acceptance.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Acceptance of cancer is an active process that changes how patients relate to internal experiences, involves a nonjudgmental and compassionate stance, and includes behavioral willingness in response to cancer-related stressors.
“As stated earlier, we conceptualize acceptance of cancer as an active process that changes how patients relate to their internal experiences of the illness such as appraisals, emotional responses, and bodily sensations.”
“Specifically, acceptance involves taking a nonjudgmental and compassionate stance toward internal experiences, thereby reducing the struggle with the realities of the illness.”
“In addition, we conceptualize acceptance as behavioral willingness in response to cancer-related stressors, resulting in action consistent with deeply held values.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“That neither sex, partnership, nor time since diagnosis affects acceptance was also shown in a meta-analytic review [8].”
From Peace, equanimity and acceptance in the cancer experience: validation of the German version (PEACE-G) and associations with mental health, health-related quality of life and psychological constructs (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The relationship between age and acceptance of cancer stands in line with findings of previous research [8, 17].”
From Peace, equanimity and acceptance in the cancer experience: validation of the German version (PEACE-G) and associations with mental health, health-related quality of life and psychological constructs (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, recent research reveals that dispositional mindfulness and acceptance, a core construct of acceptance and commitment therapy, are beneficial psychological resources that could facilitate post-HSCT recovery [19, 20].”
From Retrospective and prospective measures of post-traumatic growth reflect different processes: longitudinal evidence of greater decline than growth following a hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While an accepting attitude towards cancer has been repeatedly associated with less distress [45], cognitive fusion has rarely been studied in cancer, with one survey linking it to greater distress in a heterogeneous sample of cancer survivors [27].”
From Symptom experiences in post-treatment cancer survivors: associations with acceptance and commitment therapy constructs. (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Meta-analytic reviews underline the importance of cancer acceptance. It was inversely associated with general and cancer-related distress, depression, and anxiety, with small to moderate effect sizes [8].”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Further analyses showed that the association between acceptance and depressive symptoms was stronger in older patients”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and that the association of acceptance and depressive symptoms as well as anxiety symptoms was stronger in early-stage patients and patients without a partner or spouse.”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Acceptance of cancer showed small-to-moderate, negative correlations with distress outcomes in a meta-analysis.40”
From Symptom experiences in advanced cancer: Relationships to acceptance and commitment therapy constructs (2021) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,817
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,038
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 · Cited by 23,020
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 · Cited by 17,893
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–132 of 132
Adlawan, M. A. M., Agbon, E. P., Monzolin, J. A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science · doi:10.9734/jesbs/2023/v36i91259
Liang, C. C. C., & Pan, I. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.12.30.23300609
Pharmacotherapy Effectiveness in Treating Mental Disorders in Kosovo's Specialized Institutions
Alidema, F. B., Alidema, A. H., Alidema, M., & Alidema, F. (2024) · Biomedical & Pharmacology Journal · doi:10.13005/bpj/3006
Ülbe, S., & Di̇ri̇k, G. (2025) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/13591053241307875
“Additionally, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), one of the third-wave cognitive behavioral therapies, is considered potentially helpful in facilitating meaning-making after traumatic events (Secinti et al., 2019).”
Song, W., Abdullah, M. F. I. L. B., Akkaif, M. A., Shari, N. I., Mujar, N. M. M., & Mansor, N. S. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07576-7
“Furthermore, disease acceptance—the willingness to embrace thoughts and feelings without judgment—has been linked to lower levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms in breast cancer patients (Secinti et al., 2019).”
Sabaei, M., Shirmahaleh, F. M., Gholamitouranposhti, M., Agah, S., & Tarimoradi, A. (2025) · Journal of Psychological Science · doi:10.61186/jps.23.144.6
Acceptance, distress tolerance and sexual adjustment among women with breast cancer
Tavoosi, A., Rezapour-Mirsaleh, Y., Ahmadi, Z., & Choobforoushzadeh, A. (2025) · Women & Health · doi:10.1080/03630242.2025.2503295 · Cited by 1
“This is consistent with previous research showing that acceptance is negatively associated with psychological distress and symptoms of depression and anxiety (Secinti et al. 2019).”
Akzeptanz- und Commitmenttherapie im (psycho)onkologischen Gespräch
Sauer, C., & Weißflog, G. (2025) · best practice onkologie · doi:10.1007/s11654-025-00676-7
Zhang, M., & Liu, S. (2025) · Psycho-Oncologie · doi:10.18282/po4407
Flecther, G. F., & Hauken, M. A. (2025) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-025-06317-4
“Here, acceptance emerged as a crucial factor in recovery, aligning with previous studies (Secinti et al. 2019 ).”
Sauer, C., Hansen, T., Prigerson, H. G., Mack, J. W., Bugaj, T. J., & Weißflog, G. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27123799
Sauer, C., Hansen, T., Prigerson, H. G., Mack, J. W., Bugaj, T. J., & Weißflog, G. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27123796
Sauer, C., Hansen, T., Prigerson, H. G., Mack, J. W., Bugaj, T. J., & Weißflog, G. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27123808
Sauer, C., Hansen, T., Prigerson, H. G., Mack, J. W., Bugaj, T. J., & Weißflog, G. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27123805
Sauer, C., Hansen, T., Prigerson, H. G., Mack, J. W., Bugaj, T. J., & Weißflog, G. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27123802
Wu, Y., Zhu, Y., Lu, L., Du, B., Jiang, R., Zheng, J., Hong, Y., Lv, C., Yao, N., & Lai, J. (2025) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-025-06759-y
“Studies have shown that unmarried patients may experience more depression, anxiety and stress when faced with cancer, which may lead to disturbances in the immune system and promote tumour progression [11, 12].”
Xu, J., Chen, Z., Zhang, R., Wang, J., Wei, J., Yuan, W., & Zong, S. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08681-3
Duijn, M., Yildirim, H., van den Hurk, C. J. G., et al. (2026) · European Urology Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.euros.2025.12.017
“Overall, the functional changes observed may relate to adaptation to disease and treatment or greater clarity regarding prognosis, but mechanistic explanations require specifically designed analyses and cannot be inferred from the current data [26].”
Li, J., Wu, X., Yang, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, T., & Teng, L. (2026) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2026.112631
Patients’ responses & reflections when receiving news of cancer progression: a qualitative study
ten Hove, J., Kain, D., Galica, J., O’Donnell, J., & Brundage, M. (2026) · BJC Reports · doi:10.1038/s44276-026-00213-1
“At the time of disease progression, many patients have already accepted their diagnosis, and the likelihood that their disease is incurable [8, 9].”
Corman, M. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/74a76275z07abz47d6zb249z4ba89cead767
Cox, D., Toledo‐Tamula, M. A., Hsieh, M. M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-026-10140-5
“Acceptance of one’s disease has been described as positively associated with finding meaning in life and negatively associated with distress, depression, and anxiety symptoms in people with cancer (Quinto et al., 2022; Secinti et al., 2019).”
Assimilating breast cancer experience: a contrasting case study
Machado, R., Basto, I., Viana, B., Almeida, B., Barbosa, A., Pinhel, C., Pereira, L., Stiles, W. B., & Pinheiro, P. (2026) · Counselling Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1080/09515070.2026.2659606
Amin, S. M., Abdelaliem, S. M. F., Alabdullah, A. A. S., Alasqah, I., El-Feshawy, N. I., Ali, H. S. I., Khedr, M. A., El-Kholy, E. A., Atta, M. H. R., El‐Monshed, A. H., et al. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-53124-z
“Previous studies have shown that acceptance can play a role in coping with cancer, but its effect may not be as immediate or measurable in terms of psychological distress as health problems 47 .”
秦, 晴. (2026) · Advances in Clinical Medicine · doi:10.12677/acm.2026.1662251
Sauer, C., Sajjad, T., Zinndorf, L., & Weißflog, G. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9994953/v1
Macías, J., Lara-Merín, L., & López-Pinar, C. (2026) · Psicothema · doi:10.70478/psicothema.2026.38.12
Psychological Resources in Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies
Bridou, M., & Robieux, L. (2026) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers18152525
“…meaning in life, and self-acceptance could reduce this negative impact by enabling cancer patients to reinterpret the adverse situation [145–147], but a lack of research on these resources’ salutogenic potential means that more evidence of their positive effects is needed before…”
Ng, A., Yeo, S., Neo, S., & Menzies, R. E. (2026) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100863
Lai, C., Giraldi, E., Paolucci, T., Cichelli, A., Mazzani, S., Pizzi, S. D., Veneziani, G., Unit, B. C., Cicalini, I., Liotti, V., et al. (2026) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-026-11278-6
“…thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations without excessive avoidance or struggle, seems to promote patients’ mental and physical well-being, as it allows them to engage in meaningful daily activities despite experiencing stressful and painful inner experiences related to the disease [27–30].”
InfluentialAndargeery, S. Y., Alenazi, D. F., AlOthman, N. O., Mutairi, R. A. A., AlShahrani, R. A., Alqahtani, S. A., Aldhafeeri, N. S., Alshomrani, R. M., & Alwesmi, M. B. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16111968
Metadata
- Authors
- Secinti, E., Tometich, D. B., Johns, S. A., & Mosher, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- Regenstrief Institute (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 27-38
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7010402
- OpenAlex
- W2942810090
- Semantic Scholar
- 3d5a1f48681be8854d19a72a4c1bce41703f5716
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Author eBooks
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (T32CA117865, F31CA220964, K05CA175048, K07CA168883)
- Walther Cancer Foundation (0175.01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- psychological distress, cancer-specific distress, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, psychological adjustment to cancer, coping, marital status, tumor stage, moderators
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Distress, Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Neoplasms, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review