The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 51 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The relationship between acceptance of cancer and distress: A meta-analytic review
Open accessAbstract
Acceptance of cancer has long been recognized as playing a critical role in psychological adjustment to the illness, but its associations with distress outcomes have not been quantitatively reviewed. Informed by coping theory and third wave conceptualizations of acceptance, we first propose an integrated model of acceptance of cancer. Then we examine the strength of the relationships between acceptance of cancer and general and cancer-specific distress in cancer patients and potential moderators of these relationships. CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and Web of Science databases were searched. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted on 78 records (N=15,448). Small-to-moderate, negative, and significant relationships were found between acceptance of cancer and general distress (r=−.31; 95% CI:−.36 to −.26, k=75); cancer-specific distress (r=−.18; 95% CI:−.21 to −.14, k=13); depressive symptoms (r=−.25; 95% CI:−.31 to −.19, k=41); and anxiety symptoms (r=−.22; 95% CI:−.30 to −.15, k=29). Age, marital status, and stage of cancer were identified as significant moderators. Findings suggest that acceptance of cancer may be important to target in interventions to reduce general and cancer-specific distress in cancer patients. Future research should focus on developing multifaceted measures of acceptance and identifying theory-based psychological and social processes that lead to greater acceptance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 51 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“anxiety symptoms (r=−.22; 95% CI:−.30 to −.15, k=29)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Age, marital status, and stage of cancer were identified as significant moderators.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“depressive symptoms (r=−.25; 95% CI:−.31 to −.19, k=41)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“depressive symptoms (r = −.25, p < .0001)”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“We found significant, small to moderate, negative relationships between acceptance of cancer and general distress, cancer-specific distress, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Mean Effect Sizes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“cancer-specific distress (r=−.18; 95% CI:−.21 to −.14, k=13)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Small-to-moderate, negative, and significant relationships were found between acceptance of cancer and general distress (r=−.31; 95% CI:−.36 to −.26, k=75)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Heterogeneity analyses demonstrated significant between-study variance in the relationships between acceptance of cancer and general distress (Q = 873.24; I2 = .91; τ2 = .06)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Based on stem-and-leaf plots, one study (Lyons et al., 2015) was identified as an outlier for the association between acceptance of cancer and depressive symptoms.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Mean Effect Sizes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lyons et al., 2015 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Age, marital status, and stage of cancer were identified as significant moderators.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Age, marital status, and stage of cancer were identified as significant moderators.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 35
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, most of the studies were conducted in the United States, and the majority of participants were married middle-aged Caucasian women.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“cancer-specific distress (ps = .279, .748, and .667, respectively)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Publication Bias
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“or anxiety (ps = .335, .322, and .338, respectively).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Publication Bias
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“as well as anxiety symptoms (b = .006, SE = .003, z = 2.08, 95% CI .000 to .011; k = 20)”
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
“and the relationship between acceptance of cancer and anxiety symptoms weakened by 0.006.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Acceptance of cancer was more strongly correlated with depressive and anxiety symptoms among cancer patients with early-stage disease; however, this finding was not replicated when examining general distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cancer stage was a significant moderator of the relationships between acceptance of cancer and depressive symptoms (b = .004, SE = .002, z = 2.59, 95% CI .001 to .007; k = 18)”
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
“For each percent increase in advanced-stage cancer patients in the sample, associations between acceptance of cancer and both depressive and anxiety symptoms weakened by 0.004.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, there was minimal heterogeneity in the relationship between acceptance of cancer and cancer-specific distress (Q = 12.76; I2 = .00; τ2 = .00); therefore, we did not conduct moderation analyses for this association.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“depressive symptoms (ps = .235, .773, and .342, respectively)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Publication Bias
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“publication status (i.e., published vs. not published), year of data collection, and study reporting quality did not significantly moderate the associations between acceptance of cancer and general distress (ps = .429, .544, and .059, respectively)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Publication Bias
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a small minority of studies reported how sample size was determined (reported in 5.13%, 4/78)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Study Reporting Quality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Marital status (i.e., percent of patients married/partnered) was a significant moderator of the relationships between acceptance of cancer and depressive symptoms (b = .007, SE = .003, z = 2.43, 95% CI .001 to .012; k = 26)”
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
“For each percent increase in married/partnered patients in the sample, the relationship between acceptance of cancer and depressive symptoms weakened by 0.007”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Moderator Analyses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Moderator Analyses · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, few authors using the COPE or Brief COPE reported whether the instructions were revised to refer to acceptance of cancer-specific stressors.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“reasons for non-participation (23.08%, 18/78)”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Study Reporting Quality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although all of our results were small to moderate effect sizes, acceptance of cancer had the smallest association with cancer-specific distress, the largest association with general distress, and similar small associations with anxiety and depressive symptoms.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When reliability coefficients were not reported in the study, the median reliability coefficients of the measures were imputed based on those reported in the sample. For single-item measures, a reliability coefficient of .60 was imputed (Hunter & Schimdt, 2004; Sharma & Yetton, 2007).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Meta-analytic Method
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hunter & Schimdt, 2004
- Not checked yetcites Sharma & Yetton, 2007
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“studies have shown that greater acceptance of cancer is related to reduced symptoms of cancer-specific distress, depression, and anxiety; however, effect sizes for these relationships vary from small to large”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Introduction > Present Study: Acceptance of Cancer and Distress
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“by accepting the illness to a greater degree, patients are empowered to engage in value-based actions, which might subsequently improve psychological well-being.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Introduction > Acceptance of Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hayes et al., 2006 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The quality of study reporting was assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (von Elm, Altman, & Egger, 2008).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Quality Assessment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites von Elm, Altman, & Egger, 2008 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effect sizes were considered statistically significant for p-values < .05.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Meta-analytic Method
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first author (ES) screened all of the titles and abstracts and, when found eligible, the full-texts; the second author (DBT) screened 20% of the titles and abstracts and 20% of the full-texts. Any discrepancies were resolved through consensus meetings.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman, 2009).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Literature Search
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, & Altman, 2009 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent reviews suggest that among cancer patients, mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions lead to significant moderate to large improvement in emotional well-being and quality of life as well as moderate to large reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms and traumatic stress responses”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Introduction > Present Study: Acceptance of Cancer and Distress
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In accordance with Hunter and Schmidt (2004), meta-analyses were conducted with raw correlations (r) and correlations corrected for measurement reliability (ρ).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Meta-analytic Method
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hunter and Schmidt (2004)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Sensitivity analyses conducted excluding this study did not yield statistically significant differences in the results; thus, the study was included in the final analyses (Lipsey & Wilson, 2001).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Results > Mean Effect Sizes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lipsey & Wilson, 2001
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 3,507 records were excluded with 95.3% agreement between raters (Cohen’s kappa = .72).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interrater agreement for study reporting quality was 91.4% (Cohen’s kappa = .81).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Quality Assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first author (ES) conducted the initial coding, and the second author (DBT) coded the information reported in 20% of the selected full-texts. There was 94.8% interrater agreement for coding (Cohen’s kappa = .89).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Coding
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, validated self-report measures of distress were selected a priori, and additional measures found during the database search were included if they had acceptable psychometric properties.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent reviews suggest that among cancer patients, mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions lead to significant moderate to large improvement in emotional well-being and quality of life as well as moderate to large reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms and traumatic stress responses”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Introduction > Present Study: Acceptance of Cancer and Distress
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As part of the inclusion criteria, validated self-report measures of acceptance of cancer were selected a priori.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was 92.6% interrater agreement for full-text screening (Cohen’s kappa = .79).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“additional measures were included if they assessed acceptance in line with our conceptual definition (i.e., recognizing and staying present with the reality of the diagnosis rather than engaging in resignation or fatalism), and if they had acceptable psychometric properties, including reliability (i.e., Cronbach’s alpha ≥ .70) and validity evidence”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For longitudinal and intervention studies, only the initial (or baseline) acceptance of cancer and general and/or cancer-specific distress correlation coefficients were extracted in order to include the largest possible sample and minimize the effects of extraneous factors (e.g., intervention, practice effects).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Method > Coding
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As advanced-stage cancer patients were underrepresented in the analyses, the results should be interpreted with caution.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alternatively, our null moderation findings for gender may be due to the limited representation of male cancer patients in the analyses.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, as in previous reviews, our meta-analytic results may be affected by publication bias (i.e., the file drawer problem). However, we attempted to minimize this limitation by including unpublished results (e.g., dissertations, conference abstracts), and analyses of publication bias suggested that this was not a significant concern.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings should be cautiously interpreted, as both younger and older adults were underrepresented in the studies.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Marital status can be considered a proxy variable for enhanced social support, which appears to influence patients’ choice of coping strategies (Holland & Holahan, 2003; Kim, Han, Shaw, McTavish, & Gustafson, 2010) and, in turn, influence distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holland & Holahan, 2003 source
- Not checked yetcites Kim, Han, Shaw, McTavish, & Gustafson, 2010
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, as in prior reviews, our analysis of study reporting quality showed that many researchers did not report information such as the determination of sample size or reasons for non-participation, thereby lowering their reporting quality and limiting our ability to evaluate their research procedures.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, current measures do not assess acceptance of cancer-specific stressors, such as the prospect of death, changes in physical appearance, and role changes, which may be more strongly associated with cancer-specific distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is likely that many patients considered their cancer experience when completing these measures, as the original instructions focus on coping with stressful life events.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Time since diagnosis did not significantly moderate the relationships between acceptance of cancer and general distress, anxiety, or depressive symptoms, suggesting that acceptance may be equally important at different phases of the cancer trajectory.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When partner support is absent, coping strategies such as acceptance might be more important for reducing distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent reviews of studies with primarily healthy adults found promising evidence that changes in acceptance, mindfulness, rumination, worry, and self-compassion are potential mechanisms underlying the mental health benefits of mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions (Alsubaie et al., 2017; Gu, Strauss, Bond, & Cavanagh, 2015).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Implications for Clinical Practice and Intervention Research
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our mixed findings might reflect the variable quality of marital relationships, as being in an unsatisfying marriage might undermine mental health to a greater extent than being single or divorced (Thomas, Liu, & Umberson, 2017; K. Williams, 2003).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Thomas, Liu, & Umberson, 2017
- Not checked yetcites K. Williams, 2003 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a number of our moderation findings were mixed and limited by the small sample sizes for certain subgroups. Thus, recommendations regarding the targeting or tailoring of acceptance-based interventions to cancer patient subgroups are premature.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Implications for Clinical Practice and Intervention Research
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Additionally, given that many cancer patients do not have an accurate perception of their disease stage (Applebaum et al., 2014), stage of cancer as identified from medical charts might not be an appropriate proxy variable for patients’ understanding of their prognosis.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Applebaum et al., 2014 source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, information regarding time since diagnosis was limited and long-term cancer survivors were underrepresented in our analyses.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Moderators of the acceptance of cancer and distress relationship
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We contend that acceptance of cancer may be a multifaceted construct (e.g., acceptance of death, changes in physical appearance, reduced self-sufficiency).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, in order to maximize the sample sizes and reduce the impact of third variables, all of our analyses were based on baseline correlational data. Thus, we cannot infer directionality and change over time in the acceptance of cancer-distress relationships.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Limitations
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“First, most of the included measures of cancer-specific distress assessed cancer-related post-traumatic stress symptoms, which tend to be endorsed at low levels compared to fear of recurrence and general distress (Abbey et al., 2015).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Abbey et al., 2015 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, pilot findings suggest that ACT leads to significant improvement in acceptance and reductions in distress outcomes in cancer patients (Fashler et al., 2018; Hulbert-Williams et al., 2015).”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Implications for Clinical Practice and Intervention Research
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, our findings in combination with these trial results suggest that acceptance of cancer-related experiences might be targeted in interventions aiming to improve mental health in cancer patients.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Implications for Clinical Practice and Intervention Research
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also found preliminary evidence that acceptance of cancer might have a greater impact on the mental health of older age groups, singles, and those with early-stage disease.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Conclusion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Consistent with our integrated model of acceptance based on coping theory (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) and third wave theories (Hayes et al., 1999; Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Linehan, 1993; Segal et al., 2002), we found that greater acceptance of cancer was related to reduced distress.”
§ The Relationship between Acceptance of Cancer and Distress: A Meta-Analytic Review > Discussion > Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lazarus & Folkman, 1984
- Not checked yetcites Hayes et al., 1999
- Not checked yetcites Kabat-Zinn, 1990
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Before this review, the link between acceptance of cancer and distress outcomes had not been quantitatively synthesized.
“its associations with distress outcomes have not been quantitatively reviewed”
The paper relies on this without support.
Acceptance of cancer has a critical role in psychological adjustment to cancer.
“Acceptance of cancer has long been recognized as playing a critical role in psychological adjustment to the illness”
The paper relies on this without support.
Variation in effect sizes may come from differences in sample characteristics and acceptance measures across studies.
“Differences in sample characteristics and measures of acceptance across studies may contribute to this variability in effect sizes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some demographic and medical subgroups of cancer patients may benefit more mentally from acceptance.
“Certain demographic and medical subgroups of cancer patients might experience greater mental health benefits from acceptance.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Acceptance of cancer is an active process that changes how patients relate to internal experiences, involves a nonjudgmental and compassionate stance, and includes behavioral willingness in response to cancer-related stressors.
“As stated earlier, we conceptualize acceptance of cancer as an active process that changes how patients relate to their internal experiences of the illness such as appraisals, emotional responses, and bodily sensations.”
“Specifically, acceptance involves taking a nonjudgmental and compassionate stance toward internal experiences, thereby reducing the struggle with the realities of the illness.”
“In addition, we conceptualize acceptance as behavioral willingness in response to cancer-related stressors, resulting in action consistent with deeply held values.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“That neither sex, partnership, nor time since diagnosis affects acceptance was also shown in a meta-analytic review [8].”
From Peace, equanimity and acceptance in the cancer experience: validation of the German version (PEACE-G) and associations with mental health, health-related quality of life and psychological constructs (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The relationship between age and acceptance of cancer stands in line with findings of previous research [8, 17].”
From Peace, equanimity and acceptance in the cancer experience: validation of the German version (PEACE-G) and associations with mental health, health-related quality of life and psychological constructs (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, recent research reveals that dispositional mindfulness and acceptance, a core construct of acceptance and commitment therapy, are beneficial psychological resources that could facilitate post-HSCT recovery [19, 20].”
From Retrospective and prospective measures of post-traumatic growth reflect different processes: longitudinal evidence of greater decline than growth following a hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While an accepting attitude towards cancer has been repeatedly associated with less distress [45], cognitive fusion has rarely been studied in cancer, with one survey linking it to greater distress in a heterogeneous sample of cancer survivors [27].”
From Symptom experiences in post-treatment cancer survivors: associations with acceptance and commitment therapy constructs. (2021) · cites this paper as [45]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Meta-analytic reviews underline the importance of cancer acceptance. It was inversely associated with general and cancer-related distress, depression, and anxiety, with small to moderate effect sizes [8].”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Further analyses showed that the association between acceptance and depressive symptoms was stronger in older patients”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“and that the association of acceptance and depressive symptoms as well as anxiety symptoms was stronger in early-stage patients and patients without a partner or spouse.”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Acceptance of cancer showed small-to-moderate, negative correlations with distress outcomes in a meta-analysis.40”
From Symptom experiences in advanced cancer: Relationships to acceptance and commitment therapy constructs (2021) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,817
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Eysenck, H. J. (1985) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(85)90087-7 · Cited by 32,038
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 · Cited by 23,020
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 · Cited by 17,893
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507 · cited 2×
“In a cancer context, acceptance is emotion-focused coping that involves acknowledging the reality of the illness, learning to live with it, and engaging in attempts to address it (Carver et al., 1989).”
BackgroundMethodWasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,361
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
(2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,477
(1993) · Cited by 7,136
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 · Cited by 6,587 · cited 2×
“We contend along with third wave theorists that acceptance is not an end in itself (Hayes et al., 2006); by accepting the illness to a greater degree, patients are empowered to engage in value-based actions, which might subsequently improve psychological well-being.”
BackgroundThe Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Self-Compassion
NEFF, K. D. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309027 · Cited by 6,436 · cited 1×
“Acceptance can also be conceptualized as a profound act of courage and self-compassion (Gilbert & Choden, 2014; Neff, 2003).”
Background(1999) · Cited by 5,934
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude Toward Oneself
NEFF, K. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309032 · Cited by 5,440
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,839
(2001) · Cited by 3,666
(2005) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,197
Park, C. L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018301 · Cited by 3,174 · cited 9×
“While Park (2010) contended that acceptance of a stressor is an outcome of the meaning-making process, acceptance may also be part of an active meaning-making process (Garland et al., 2017), leading to more effective meanings-made or growth, and, in turn, reducing distress.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHölzel, B. K., Lazar, S. W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D. R., & Ott, U. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611419671 · Cited by 3,024
Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life
Kwee, M. G. T. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)90133-7 · Cited by 2,912
The Neuroscience of Mindfulness Meditation
Tang, Y.-Y., Hölzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3916 · Cited by 2,889
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.012 · Cited by 2,698
Mitchell, A. J., Chan, M., Bhatti, H., Halton, M., Grassi, L., Johansen, C., & Meader, N. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70002-x · Cited by 2,449
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
Raudenbush, S. W., Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289738 · Cited by 2,368
Assessment of Mindfulness by Self-Report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191104268029 · Cited by 2,298
Gu, J., Strauss, C., Bond, R., & Cavanagh, K. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006 · Cited by 1,712
Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model
Viechtbauer, W. (2005) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986030003261 · Cited by 1,699 · cited 1×
“Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood estimators (Viechtbauer, 2005).”
MethodJones, H. E. (2010) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01108.x · Cited by 1,447
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: A New Approach to Preventing Relapse
Morgan, D. (2003) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/713869628 · Cited by 1,307
(2011) · Cited by 1,303
Mindfulness and acceptance: expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-6797 · Cited by 1,274 · cited 3×
“These theorists contend that acceptance is not simply tolerating the existence of cancer, but, rather, embracing the moment-by-moment experience of the illness including the difficult private events (e.g., thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations) as they occur (Hayes et al., 2004).”
BackgroundAnxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: Prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age
Linden, W., Vodermaier, A., MacKenzie, R., & Greig, D. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.025 · Cited by 1,245
Depression and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis
Pinquart, M., & Duberstein, P. R. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709992285 · Cited by 1,083
Garland, E. L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A. M., Johnson, D. P., Meyer, P. S., & Penn, D. L. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.002 · Cited by 1,035 · cited 1×
“, mentally reconstructing the illness and related stressors as meaningful or growth promoting), which confers mental health benefits (Garland et al., 2015; Garland et al., 2010).”
Kashdan, T. B., Barrios, V., Forsyth, J. P., & Steger, M. F. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.003 · Cited by 994 · cited 1×
“Third wave theorists also contend that experiential acceptance is the opposite of experiential avoidance, defined as attempts or desires to avoid unwanted private events, such as thoughts, feelings, and symptoms (Hayes et al., 2004; Hulbert-Williams et al., 2015; Kashdan et al., 2006).”
BackgroundPhysical disability--A psychological approach.
Wright, B. A. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10038-000 · Cited by 979
Depression as a predictor of disease progression and mortality in cancer patients: A Meta‐Analysis
Satin, J. R., Linden, W., & Phillips, M. J. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24561 · Cited by 972
Mechanisms of mindfulness training: Monitor and Acceptance Theory (MAT
Lindsay, E. K., & Creswell, J. D. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.011 · Cited by 919
Regression Methods to Detect Publication and Other Bias in Meta‐Analysis
Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2005) · Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis · doi:10.1002/0470870168.ch6 · Cited by 826
Garland, E. L., Farb, N. A., R. Goldin, P., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2015) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2015.1064294 · Cited by 810 · cited 6×
“, 1989; Lazarus & Folkman, 1984; Park, 2010) and third wave theories (Garland et al., 2015; Hayes et al., 1994; Kabat-Zinn, 1990; Linehan, 1993; Segal et al., 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialSears, S. R., Stanton, A. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2003) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.487 · Cited by 803
Family Relationships and Well-Being
Thomas, P. A., Liu, H., & Umberson, D. (2017) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igx025 · Cited by 768
Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale
Watson, M., Greer, S., Young, J., Inayat, Q., Burgess, C., & Robertson, B. (1988) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700002026 · Cited by 666 · cited 1×
“In the context of cancer, having a fighting spirit involves viewing the illness as a challenge, maintaining an optimistic outlook, and working towards beating the disease (Livneh, 2000; Watson et al., 1988).”
BackgroundPublication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005) · Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis · doi:10.1002/0470870168.ch1 · Cited by 603
Coping or acceptance? What to do about chronic pain
McCracken, L. M., & Eccleston, C. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00202-1 · Cited by 591
Williams, K. (2003) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/1519794 · Cited by 557 · cited 1×
“Our mixed findings might reflect the variable quality of marital relationships, as being in an unsatisfying marriage might undermine mental health to a greater extent than being single or divorced (Thomas, Liu, & Umberson, 2017; K. Williams, 2003).”
ResultFamily Support in Advanced Cancer
Given, B. A., Given, C. W., & Kozachik, S. (2001) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.51.4.213 · Cited by 527
Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder
Brasfield, C. R. (1994) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)90183-x · Cited by 517
Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature
Hagerty, R. G., Butow, P. N., Ellis, P. M., Dimitry, S., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2005) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi211 · Cited by 504
Graham, C. D., Gouick, J., Krahé, C., & Gillanders, D. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.009 · Cited by 476
Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer
Manne, S. L., & Badr, H. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23450 · Cited by 471
Fletcher, L. B., & Hayes, S. C. (2005) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-005-0017-7 · Cited by 431
Alsubaie, M., Abbott, R., Dunn, B., Dickens, C., Keil, T. F., Henley, W., & Kuyken, W. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.04.008 · Cited by 383 · cited 1×
“Recent reviews of studies with primarily healthy adults found promising evidence that changes in acceptance, mindfulness, rumination, worry, and self-compassion are potential mechanisms underlying the mental health benefits of mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions (Alsubaie et al., 2017; Gu, Strauss, Bond, &…”
BackgroundCleeland, C. S., Zhao, F., Chang, V. T., Sloan, J. A., O'Mara, A. M., Gilman, P. B., Weiss, M., Mendoza, T. R., Lee, J., & Fisch, M. J. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28376 · Cited by 316 · cited 1×
“Many cancer patients endure aggressive treatments that result in high symptom burden and functional limitations as well as financial difficulties (Cleeland et al., 2013; Peppercorn, 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-compassion, stress, and coping in the context of chronic illness
Sirois, F. M., Molnar, D. S., & Hirsch, J. K. (2015) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2014.996249 · Cited by 312
Brown, L. F., Kroenke, K., Theobald, D. E., Wu, J., & Tu, W. (2010) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1627 · Cited by 295
Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148789 · Cited by 285
McCracken, L. M., & Gutiérrez-Martínez, O. (2011) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.02.004 · Cited by 283
Abbey, G., Thompson, S. B. N., Hickish, T., & Heathcote, D. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3654 · Cited by 280
Haller, H., Winkler, M. M., Klose, P., Dobos, G., Kümmel, S., & Cramer, H. (2017) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2017.1342862 · Cited by 277 · cited 1×
“Recent reviews suggest that among cancer patients, mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions lead to significant moderate to large improvement in emotional well-being and quality of life as well as moderate to large reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms and traumatic stress responses (Fashler et al., 2018…”
BackgroundWhat is the evidence for the use of mindfulness‐based interventions in cancer care? A review
Shennan, C., Payne, S., & Fenlon, D. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1819 · Cited by 271
Koch, L., Bertram, H., Eberle, A., Holleczek, B., Schmid-Höpfner, S., Waldmann, A., Zeissig, S. R., Brenner, H., & Arndt, V. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3452 · Cited by 253
The burden of psychosocial morbidity related to cancer: patient and family issues
Caruso, R., Nanni, M. G., Riba, M. B., Sabato, S., & Grassi, L. (2017) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540261.2017.1288090 · Cited by 244 · cited 1×
“, cancer-related post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] or fear of recurrence) (Abbey, Thompson, Hickish, & Heathcote, 2015; Caruso et al., 2017; Dinkel et al., 2014; van den Beuken-van Everdingen et al., 2008).”
BackgroundThe Relation of Social Support and Coping to Positive Adaptation to Breast Cancer
Dukes Holland, K., & Holahan, C. K. (2003) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/0887044031000080656 · Cited by 236
Hulbert-Williams, N. J., Storey, L., & Wilson, K. G. (2015) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.12223 · Cited by 228 · cited 3×
“Third wave theorists also contend that experiential acceptance is the opposite of experiential avoidance, defined as attempts or desires to avoid unwanted private events, such as thoughts, feelings, and symptoms (Hayes et al., 2004; Hulbert-Williams et al., 2015; Kashdan et al., 2006).”
BackgroundLindsay, E. K., Young, S., Smyth, J. M., Brown, K. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.09.015 · Cited by 226
Lindsay, E. K., Young, S., Smyth, J. M., Brown, K. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/4se5m · Cited by 226
Lindsay, E. K., Chin, B., Greco, C. M., Young, S., Brown, K. W., Wright, A. G. C., Smyth, J. M., Burkett, D., & Creswell, J. D. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000134 · Cited by 218
(2004) · Cited by 214
Kim, J.-H., Han, J. Y., Shaw, B. R., Mctavish, F. M., & Gustafson, D. H. (2010) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105309355338 · Cited by 203
Coping and experiential avoidance: Unique or overlapping constructs?
Karekla, M., & Panayiotou, G. (2011) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.10.002 · Cited by 196
Scrignaro, M., Barni, S., & Magrin, M. E. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1782 · Cited by 196
van den Beuken‐van Everdingen, M. H. J., Peters, M. L., de Rijke, J. M., Schouten, H. C., van Kleef, M., & Patijn, J. (2008) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1340 · Cited by 194
Zhang, M.-F., Wen, Y.-S., Liu, W.-Y., Peng, L.-F., Wu, X.-D., & Liu, Q.-W. (2015) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000000897 · Cited by 172
Mausbach, B. T., Schwab, R. B., & Irwin, S. A. (2015) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3471-7 · Cited by 171
Meta-Analysis: A Comparison of Approaches
Tomasic, D. M. (2005) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200503000-00032 · Cited by 166
Lin, C., Clark, R., Tu, P., Bosworth, H. B., & Zullig, L. L. (2017) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4317-2 · Cited by 160 · cited 1×
“and associations with important health outcomes (L. F. Brown et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2017; Pinquart & Duberstein, 2010).”
BackgroundMack, J. W., Nilsson, M., Balboni, T., Friedlander, R. J., Block, S. D., Trice, E., & Prigerson, H. G. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23476 · Cited by 155
Acceptance: An Historical and Conceptual Review
Williams, J. C., & Lynn, S. J. (2010) · Imagination, Cognition and Personality · doi:10.2190/ic.30.1.c · Cited by 155
A Longitudinal Investigation of Coping and Posttraumatic Growth in Breast Cancer Survivors
Bussell, V. A., & Naus, M. J. (2010) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347330903438958 · Cited by 152
Gillanders, D. T., Sinclair, A. K., MacLean, M., & Jardine, K. (2015) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.07.003 · Cited by 149 · cited 1×
“, degree of cognitive fusion) can also lead to distress (Garland et al., 2015; Gillanders et al., 2015; Hayes et al., 2006).”
BackgroundChen, C. H., Kuo, S. C., & Tang, S. T. (2017) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216316663976 · Cited by 146
Conceptualizing prognostic awareness in advanced cancer: A systematic review
Applebaum, A. J., Kolva, E. A., Kulikowski, J. R., Jacobs, J. D., DeRosa, A., Lichtenthal, W. G., Olden, M. E., Rosenfeld, B., & Breitbart, W. (2014) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105313484782 · Cited by 145 · cited 2×
“However, up to 75% of cancer patients do not have an accurate understanding of their disease stage or prognosis (Applebaum et al., 2014), which may, in part, reflect a lack of acceptance.”
BackgroundHawkes, A. L., Pakenham, K. I., Chambers, S. K., Patrao, T. A., & Courneya, K. S. (2014) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-014-9610-2 · Cited by 132
A longitudinal study of psychosocial distress in breast cancer: Prevalence and risk factors
Andreu, Y., Galdón, M. J., Durá, E., Martínez, P., Pérez, S., & Murgui, S. (2012) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2010.542814 · Cited by 129 · cited 1×
“, Bussell & Naus, 2010; Peters, Goedendorp, Verhagen, van der Graaf, & Bleijenberg, 2014), whereas resignation is associated with higher anxiety and depressive symptoms (Andreu et al., 2012; Hong, Wei, & Wang, 2015).”
BackgroundZimmermann, F. F., Burrell, B., & Jordan, J. (2018) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.12.014 · Cited by 108
Giese‐Davis, J., Waller, A. E., Carlson, L. E., Groff, S. L., Zhong, L., Neri, E., Bachor, S. M., Adamyk-Simpson, J., Rancourt, K. M., Dunlop, B., et al. (2012) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-12-441 · Cited by 94 · cited 1×
“Introduction When diagnosed with a life-threatening disease such as cancer, patients are confronted with a range of distressing circumstances (Giese-Davis et al., 2012).”
BackgroundMental Adjustment to Cancer Scale©: psychometric properties in a large cancer cohort
Watson, M., & Homewood, J. (2008) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1345 · Cited by 90
Patient-Reported Comorbidity and Survival in Older Adults with Cancer
Williams, G. R., Deal, A. M., Lund, J. L., Chang, Y., Muss, H. B., Pergolotti, M., Guerard, E. J., Shachar, S. S., Wang, Y., Kenzik, K. M., et al. (2017) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0404 · Cited by 88
Psychosocial Adaptation to Cancer: The Role of Coping Strategies
Livneh, H. (2000) · Journal of rehabilitation · Cited by 81
The Use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Oncology Settings: A Narrative Review
Fashler, S. R., Weinrib, A. Z., Azam, M. A., & Katz, J. (2018) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294117726061 · Cited by 80 · cited 2×
“Recent reviews suggest that among cancer patients, mindfulness and acceptance-based interventions lead to significant moderate to large improvement in emotional well-being and quality of life as well as moderate to large reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms and traumatic stress responses (Fashler et al., 2018…”
BackgroundCancer-related trauma, stigma and growth: the ‘lived’ experience of head and neck cancer
Threader, J., & McCormack, L. (2015) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.12320 · Cited by 73
Garland, E. L., Thielking, P., Thomas, E. A., Coombs, M., White, S., Lombardi, J., & Beck, A. (2017) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4065 · Cited by 72
Comorbidity of fear of progression and anxiety disorders in cancer patients
Dinkel, A., Kremsreiter, K., Marten‐Mittag, B., & Lahmann, C. (2014) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.08.006 · Cited by 69 · cited 1×
“, cancer-related post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD] or fear of recurrence) (Abbey, Thompson, Hickish, & Heathcote, 2015; Caruso et al., 2017; Dinkel et al., 2014; van den Beuken-van Everdingen et al., 2008).”
BackgroundGilbert, P., & Choden, C. (2014) · Cited by 63
Wells, K. J., Booth‐Jones, M., & Jacobsen, P. B. (2009) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347330902978947 · Cited by 59
Acceptance, social support, benefit-finding, and depression in women with gynecological cancer
Manne, S. L., Kashy, D. A., Virtue, S. M., Criswell, K. R., Kissane, D. W., Ozga, M., Heckman, C. J., Stapleton, J. L., & Rodriguez, L. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1953-x · Cited by 55
Pain Catastrophizing, Mindfulness, and Pain Acceptance
Elvery, N., Jensen, M. P., Ehde, D. M., & Day, M. A. (2017) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000430 · Cited by 54
A comprehensive review of palliative care in patients with cancer
Jaiswal, R., Alici, Y., & BREITBART, W. S. (2014) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540261.2013.868788 · Cited by 53
Hong, J., Wei, Z., & Wang, W. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.12816 · Cited by 50
Lyons, K. D., Hull, J. G., Kaufman, P. A., Li, Z., Seville, J. L., Ahles, T. A., Kornblith, A. B., & Hegel, M. T. (2015) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1080/07347332.2014.1002659 · Cited by 42 · cited 1×
“Based on stem-and-leaf plots, one study (Lyons et al., 2015) was identified as an outlier for the association between acceptance of cancer and depressive symptoms.”
BackgroundTrajectories of the Multidimensional Dying Experience for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients
Tang, S. T., Liu, L. N., Lin, K., Chung, J.-H., Hsieh, C., Chou, W.-C., & Su, P. (2014) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.01.011 · Cited by 42
Bright, E. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2017) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000272 · Cited by 42
Life and treatment goals of patients with advanced, incurable cancer
Rand, K. L., Banno, D. A., Shea, A. M., & Cripe, L. D. (2016) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3113-6 · Cited by 39 · cited 1×
“Among advanced cancer patients in particular, endorsing a fighting spirit has been associated with greater psychological distress (Rand et al., 2016).”
BackgroundLow, J., Serfaty, M., Davis, S., Vickerstaff, V., Gola, A., Omar, R. Z., King, M., Tookman, A., Austen, J. S. J., Turner, K., et al. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1169-8 · Cited by 37
Peters, M. E. W. J., Goedendorp, M. M., Verhagen, S. A. H. H. V. M., van der Graaf, W. T. A., & Bleijenberg, G. (2014) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3481 · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“Present Study: Acceptance of Cancer and Distress Consistent with our integrated model of acceptance, studies have shown that greater acceptance of cancer is related to reduced symptoms of cancer-specific distress, depression, and anxiety; however, effect sizes for these relationships vary from small to large (e.g., Da…”
ResultBarata, A., Gonzalez, B. D., Sutton, S. K., Small, B. J., Jacobsen, P. B., Field, T. L., Fernandez, H. F., & Jim, H. (2016) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105316642004 · Cited by 25
Older age is associated with less cancer treatment: a longitudinal study of English cancer patients
Craigs, C., Bennett, M., Hurlow, A., et al. (2018) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afy094 · Cited by 24
The financial burden of cancer care: do patients in the US know what to expect?
Peppercorn, J. M. (2014) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.2014.963558 · Cited by 23 · cited 1×
“Many cancer patients endure aggressive treatments that result in high symptom burden and functional limitations as well as financial difficulties (Cleeland et al., 2013; Peppercorn, 2014).”
BackgroundAdjustment to Life with Lung Cancer
Czerw, A. I., Religioni, U., & Deptała, A. (2016) · Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.17219/acem/61014 · Cited by 19
Baliousis, M., Rennoldson, M., Dawson, D. L., Mills, J., & das Nair, R. (2017) · Oncology nursing forum · doi:10.1188/17.onf.96-107 · Cited by 17
Czerw, A. I., Bilińska, M., & Deptała, A. (2015) · Współczesna Onkologia · doi:10.5114/wo.2015.54901 · Cited by 16
The Advance Care Planning Readiness Scale
Brown, A. J., Shen, M. J., Urbauer, D. L., Taylor, J. S., Parker, P. A., Carmack, C. L., Prescott, L. S., Rosemore, C., Kolawole, E. M., Sun, C. C., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1097/igc.0000000000000953 · Cited by 16
Affective differentiation in breast cancer patients
Dasch, K. B., Cohen, L. H., Belcher, A., Laurenceau, J.-P., Kendall, J., Siegel, S., Parrish, B., & Graber, E. (2010) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-010-9274-8 · Cited by 13
Quality of partner support moderates positive affect in patients with cancer
Kaliampos, A., & Roussi, P. (2018) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4672 · Cited by 13
Nowicki, A., Marciniak, J., Farbicka, P., & Banaszkiewicz, Z. (2015) · Polish Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1515/pjs-2015-0085 · Cited by 10 · cited 1×
“Gender differences in acceptance coping have not been consistent across studies (Czerw, Religioni, & Deptala, 2016; Nowicki et al., 2015).”
ResultUsing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to (Re)conceptualize Stress Appraisal
Butts, C. M., & Gutiérrez, D. (2018) · Journal of Mental Health Counseling · doi:10.17744/mehc.40.2.01 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Expression of resilience, coping and quality of life in people with cancer
Macía, P., Barranco, M., Gorbeña, S., & Castillo, I. I. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236572 · Cited by 113
Health-related quality of life in adults with low-grade gliomas: a systematic review
Rimmer, B., Bolnykh, I., Dutton, L., Lewis, J., Burns, R., Gallagher, P., Williams, S., Araújo‐Soares, V., Menger, F., & Sharp, L. (2022) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-022-03207-x · Cited by 71
“Time for adjustment to the diagnosis is also important, and likely influences the temporal trends; acceptance has been associated with reduced general, and cancer-related, distress [60].”
BackgroundPsilocybin-assisted therapy improves psycho-social-spiritual well-being in cancer patients
Shnayder, S., Ameli, R., Sinaii, N., Berger, A. M., & Agrawal, M. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.046 · Cited by 73
Rutkowski, S., Czech, O., Wrzeciono, A., Kiper, P., Szczepańska-Gieracha, J., & Malicka, I. (2021) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102767 · Cited by 66
Illness Perception and Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer
Ośmiałowska, E., Staś, J., Chabowski, M., & Jankowska‐Polańska, B. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14051214 · Cited by 55
“Illness acceptance allows for a rational assessment of one’s situation and undertaking health maintenance activities, which may increase QoL [46,47].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Secinti, E., Tometich, D. B., Johns, S. A., & Mosher, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- Regenstrief Institute (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 27-38
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7010402
- OpenAlex
- W2942810090
- Semantic Scholar
- 3d5a1f48681be8854d19a72a4c1bce41703f5716
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Author eBooks
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (T32CA117865, F31CA220964, K05CA175048, K07CA168883)
- Walther Cancer Foundation (0175.01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- psychological distress, cancer-specific distress, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, psychological adjustment to cancer, coping, marital status, tumor stage, moderators
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Distress, Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Neoplasms, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review