Cited by 53Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

Treating treatment non-responders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled psychotherapy trials

Gloster, Andrew T., Rinner, Marcia T.B., Ioannou, Myria, Villanueva, Jeanette, Block, Victoria J., Ferrari, Giovanna, Benoy, Charles, Bader, Klaus +1 more·2020·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Background Non-responsiveness to treatment occurs in approximately one third of patients. Randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy options for these patients are scarce and systematic knowledge about whether psychotherapy is a viable option is lacking. Objectives This meta-analysis aimed to 1) determine the amount of evidence available for treatment non-response using psychotherapy relative to pharmacological procedures; 2) systematically review randomized controlled psychotherapy trials (RCTs) used to treat non-responders; and 3) examine whether some psychotherapies are more efficacious than others. Data sources Online databases were systematically examined and references of relevant systematic reviews were hand-searched. Study eligibility criteria RCTs that administered a psychotherapy new to non-responders were considered. All Mood and Anxiety Disorders were considered. No limitations were made with respect to type of treatment. Review method A meta-analytic review of the psychotherapy RCTs for treatment non-responders. Results Results showed that psychotherapy was successful in treating treatment non-responders with a medium to large effect size. Between-group comparisons did not reveal significant differences in treatment effects for any of the assessed disorder or treatment types. Effects were maintained at follow-up. Conclusions Psychotherapy is a viable treatment option for treatment non-responders. More attention to this group of patients is needed and more research with better quality studies is warranted. Recommendations are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101810

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gloster, A. T., Rinner, M. T. B., Ioannou, M., Villanueva, J., Block, V. J., Ferrari, G., Benoy, C., Bader, K., & Karekla, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
Corresponding author
Gloster, Andrew T.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
75
Pages
101810
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995527320
Cited by
53
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P1_163716/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
treatment non-responders, psychotherapy, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, pharmacotherapy, treatment-resistant depression, psychotherapy efficacy, psychotherapy versus pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Psychotherapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review