Cited by 21Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMigraine and Headache StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Mechanisms of change in acceptance and commitment therapy for primary headaches

Open access
Vasiliou, Vasilis S., Karademas, Evangelos C., Christou, Yiolanda, Papacostas, Savvas, Karekla, Maria·2022·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Background: Despite the demonstrated effectiveness of behavioural headache interventions, it is not yet known which intervention processes account for treatment responses. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), an emerging behavioural intervention for headaches, proposes psychological flexibility (PF) processes as the mechanisms via which intervention change occurs. This is the first study examining these processes of change variables on headache‐related disability and quality of life (treatment outcome). Methods: Data originated from a Randomized Clinical Trial evaluating the efficacy of ACT for primary headaches. Ninety‐four individuals with primary headaches (M = 43 y; 84% females; M headache frequency/month = 9.30) were randomized to either an ACT‐based or a Wait‐list control group (N = 47 in each). Participants completed questionnaires related to their headache experiences and PF processes at pre‐ (T1), post‐treatment (T2), and 3‐month follow‐up (T3). Results: Following a bootstrapped cross product of coefficients approach, results demonstrated mediating effects of headache acceptance, cognitive defusion, avoidance of headache, and mindfulness in the ACT group compared to control on parameters of headache‐related disability and quality of life at post and 3‐month follow‐ups. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that changes in certain PF processes lower disability and improve quality of life in headache sufferers, supporting that ACT works via its proposed mechanisms of change. Interventions for headache management may be optimized if they target increases in headache acceptance, defusion from thoughts, and mindfulness. Significance: Psychological flexibility (PF) guides the ACT approach, an emerging behavioral headache intervention that focuses on optimizing head pain adjustment via flexible responses to pain. It targets at increasing daily functioning rather than preventing or controlling headache episodes. Pain acceptance, cognitive defusion, and mindfulness act as processes of functional change in ACT, lowering disability and increasing daily functioning and quality of life. These components can upgrade the established effectiveness of behavioral headache interventions with personalized, modularized therapeutic targets that can help headache sufferers re‐establish optimal daily functioning even in fluctuating and persistent headache episodes. Trial registration: clinical trials.gov registry (NCT02734992).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1851

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McCracken, L. M., & Gutiérrez-Martínez, O. (2011b). Processes of change in psychological flexibility in an interdisciplinary group-based treatment for chronic pain based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(4), 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.02.004 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vasiliou, V. S., Karademas, E. C., Christou, Y., Papacostas, S., & Karekla, M.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • University of Crete (GR)
  • Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics (CY)
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
Corresponding author
Karekla, Maria
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-18
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
167-180
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W3190708540
Cited by
21
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, primary headache, psychological flexibility, mechanisms of change, cognitive defusion, mindfulness, headache-related disability, quality of life, mediation analysis
MeSH terms
Female, Headache, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review