Cited by 29Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMental Health Treatment and Access

The Phenomenon of Treatment Dropout, Reasons and Moderators in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Other Active Treatments: A Meta-Analytic Review

Open access
Karekla, Maria, Constantinou, Penelopi, Ioannou, Myria, Gloster, Andrew T., Kareklas, Ioannis·2019·Clinical Psychology in Europe

Abstract

Treatment dropout is one of the most crucial issues that a therapist has to face on a daily basis. The negative effects of premature termination impact the client who is usually found to demonstrate poorer treatment outcomes. This meta-analysis reviewed and systematically examined dropout effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) as compared to other active treatments. The goals of this study were to compare treatment dropout rates and dropout reasons, examine the influence of demographic variables and identify possible therapy moderators associated with dropout. The current meta-analysis reviewed 76 studies of ACT reporting dropout rates for various psychological and health-related conditions. Across reviewed studies (N = 76), the overall weighted mean dropout rate was 17.95% (ACT = 17.35% vs. comparison conditions = 18.62%). Type of disorder, recruitment setting and therapists’ experience level were significant moderators of dropout. The most frequently reported reasons for dropout from ACT were lost contact, personal and transportation difficulties, whereas for comparative treatments they were lost contact, therapy factors and time demands. Given that most moderators of influence are not amenable to direct changes by clinicians, mediation variables should also be explored. Overall, results suggest that ACT appears to present some benefits in dropout rates for specific disorders, settings and therapists. There was no difference in dropout rate between ACT and control conditions (17.35% vs.18.62%). Significant moderators were client disorder, therapists’ experience level and recruitment and setting. Comparison condition frequently reported therapy related dropout factors, suggesting that ACT may be a more acceptable option. There was no difference in dropout rate between ACT and control conditions (17.35% vs.18.62%). Significant moderators were client disorder, therapists’ experience level and recruitment and setting. Comparison condition frequently reported therapy related dropout factors, suggesting that ACT may be a more acceptable option.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32872/cpe.v1i3.33058

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drop-out rates in other ACT studies were 18% (Karekla et al., 2019) and 16% (Ong et al., 2018).

    “However, the drop-out rate for the ACT psychoeducation group was 53%, which is noticeably higher than reported for other ACT studies (18%, Karekla et al., 2019; 16%, Ong et al., 2018).”

    From Reducing Test Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2024) · cites this paper as Karekla et al., 2019

    The Dropout Rates section reports an average dropout rate of 17.35% for ACT trials, which is close to the cited 18%. The approximately 18% figure (17.95%) is the overall rate across ACT and comparison conditions, not the ACT-specific rate. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The dropout rate of this self-guided digital intervention (23%) is slightly higher than those of face-to-face, therapist-led ACT programs (15.8% and 17.35%).

    “The dropout rate of this self-guided digital intervention (23%) is slightly higher than those of face-to-face, therapist-led ACT programs (15.8% [71] and 17.35% [72]).”

    From Development and feasibility of a digital acceptance and commitment therapy⇓based intervention for generalized anxiety disorder: Pilot acceptability study (2021) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Dropout Rates section reports an average ACT dropout rate of 17.35%, which is lower than the citing study’s stated 23%. But it is not a rate specifically for face-to-face, therapist-led ACT: the review also included self-help and web-based ACT studies. The 15.8% figure is attached to a different citation, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • To account for the expected 17% dropout rate reported in a previous meta-analysis of ACT-based interventions, the research team intends to collect 4 additional participants per group.

    “To account for the expected 17% dropout rate reported in a previous meta-analysis of ACT-based interventions [81], the research team intends to collect 4 additional participants per group.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 102 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Clinical Psychology in Europe 2019, Vol.1(3), Article e33058 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.v1i3.33058 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2019, Vol.1(3), Article e33058 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.v1i3.33058 References · DOI
  2. Djordjevic, A., & Frögéli, E. (2012). Mind the gap: ACT for preventing stress-related ill-health among future nurses. A randomized controlled trial (Graduate thesis). Stockholm, Sweden: Institute for Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute.
  3. Karekla, M. (2004). A comparison between acceptance-enhanced panic control treatment and panic control treatment for panic disorder (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New York, New York City, NY, USA.
  4. Kingston, J. (2008). A pilot randomized control trial of ACT vs. CBT-treatment as usual (CBT-TAU) for a heterogeneous group of treatment resistant patients (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  5. Lassen, E. W. (2010). The effects of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on anxiety in people with psychosis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karekla, M., Constantinou, P., Ioannou, M., Gloster, A. T., & Kareklas, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Published
2019-09-20
Volume
1
Issue
3
ISSN
2625-3410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973714138
Cited by
29
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology in Europe (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsychOpen Gold (Leibniz Institute for Psychology) (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • ZooKeys (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Europe’s Journal of Psychology (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
treatment discontinuation, acceptance and commitment therapy, early termination, causes of dropout, therapist experience, psychotherapy outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review