The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Narrative research: a review of methodology and relevance to clinical practice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics
Frank, A. W. (1995) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226260037.001.0001 · Cited by 3,214
Cited by
Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note
Holt, A. (2010) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794109348686 · Cited by 538
Schölzel-Dorenbos, C. J. M., Meeuwsen, E. J., & Olde Rikkert, M. G. M. (2010) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860903046495 · Cited by 124
Ayeb-Karlsson, S. (2021) · Climate and Development · doi:10.1080/17565529.2020.1777078 · Cited by 82
Women's narratives on experiences of work ability and functioning in fibromyalgia
Sallinen, M., Kukkurainen, M. L., Peltokallio, L., & Mikkelsson, M. (2010) · Musculoskeletal Care · doi:10.1002/msc.162 · Cited by 50
Children’s digital play as collective family resilience in the face of the pandemic
Burke, A., Kumpulainen, K., & Smith, C. (2023) · Journal of Early Childhood Literacy · doi:10.1177/14687984221124179 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Overcash, J. A.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-184
- ISSN
- 1040-8428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093505760
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Narrative research: a review of methodology and relevance to clinical practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2003.04.006
- The paper
- Overcash, J. A. (2003). Narrative research: a review of methodology and relevance to clinical practice. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2003.04.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
