Cited by 19Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 255 of the 256 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revisiting the role of alkylating agents in multiple myeloma: Up-to-date evidence and future perspectives

Costa, Bruno Almeida, Mouhieddine, Tarek H., Ortiz, Ricardo J., Richter, Joshua·2023·Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

Abstract

From the 1960s to the early 2000s, alkylating agents (e.g., melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and bendamustine) remained a key component of standard therapy for newly-diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Later on, their associated toxicities (including second primary malignancies) and the unprecedented efficacy of novel therapies have led clinicians to increasingly consider alkylator-free approaches. Meanwhile, new alkylating agents (e.g., melflufen) and new applications of old alkylators (e.g., lymphodepletion before chimeric antigen receptor T-cell [CAR-T] therapy) have emerged in recent years. Given the expanding use of antigen-directed modalities (e.g., monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T therapy), this review explores the current and future role of alkylating agents in different treatment settings (e.g., induction, consolidation, stem cell mobilization, pre-transplant conditioning, salvage, bridging, and lymphodepleting chemotherapy) to ellucidate the role of alkylator-based regimens in modern-day MM management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104040

Cites

255 of 255 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Durie, 2020, Cancer J., 10, 53

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Costa, B. A., Mouhieddine, T. H., Ortiz, R. J., & Richter, J.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Tisch Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Richter, Joshua
Venue
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
187
Pages
104040
ISSN
1040-8428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378212210
Cited by
18
References
256
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
alkylating agents, multiple myeloma, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, bendamustine, melflufen, lymphocyte depletion, CAR T-cell therapy, second primary malignancy, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, stem cell mobilization, pre-transplant conditioning, consolidation therapy, bridging therapy
MeSH terms
Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Alkylating Agents, Cyclophosphamide, Humans, Multiple Myeloma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review