Deuterium labeling enables proteome-wide turnover kinetics analysis in cell culture
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Protein turnover is a critical component of gene expression regulation and cellular homeostasis, yet methods for measuring turnover rates that are scalable and applicable to different models are still needed. We introduce an improved D 2 O (heavy water) labeling strategy to investigate the landscape of protein turnover in cell culture, with accurate calibration of per-residue deuterium incorporation in multiple cell types. Applying this method, we mapped the proteome-wide turnover landscape of pluripotent and differentiating human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). Our analysis highlights the role of APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome) and SPOP (speckle-type POZ protein) degrons in the fast turnover of cell-cycle-related and DNA-binding hiPSC proteins. Upon pluripotency exit, many short-lived hiPSC proteins are depleted, while RNA-binding and -splicing proteins become hyperdynamic. The ability to identify fast-turnover proteins also facilitates secretome profiling, as exemplified in hiPSC-cardiomyocyte and primary human cardiac fibroblast analysis. This method is broadly applicable to protein turnover studies in primary, pluripotent, and transformed cells.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
A “Proteomic Ruler” for Protein Copy Number and Concentration Estimation without Spike-in Standards
Wiśniewski, J. R., Hein, M. Y., Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2014) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m113.037309 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Zhuang, M., Calabrese, M. F., Liu, J., Waddell, M. B., Nourse, A., Hammel, M., Miller, D. J., Walden, H., Duda, D. M., Seyedin, S. N., et al. (2009) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.022 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Bulut-Karslioglu, A., Macrae, T. A., Oses-Prieto, J. A., Covarrubias, S., Percharde, M., Ku, G., Diaz, A., McManus, M. T., Burlingame, A. L., & Ramalho-Santos, M. (2018) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.02.004 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
An optimized quantitative proteomics method establishes the cell type‐resolved mouse brain secretome
Tüshaus, J., Müller, S. A., Kataka, E. S., Zaucha, J., Sebastian Monasor, L., Su, M., Güner, G., Jocher, G., Tahirovic, S., Frishman, D., et al. (2020) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2020105693 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Drake, J. C., Peelor, F. F., Biela, L. M., Watkins, M. K., Miller, R. A., Hamilton, K. L., & Miller, B. F. (2013) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glt047 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
DEGRONOPEDIA: a web server for proteome-wide inspection of degrons
Szulc, N. A., Stefaniak, F., Piechota, M., Soszyńska, A., Piórkowska, G., Cappannini, A., Bujnicki, J. M., Maniaci, C., & Pokrzywa, W. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae238 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Alamillo, L., Ng, D. C. M., Currie, J., Black, A., Pandi, B., Manda, V., Pavelka, J., Schaal, P., Travers, J. G., McKinsey, T. A., Lam, M. P. Y., & Lau, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lam, Maggie P.Y.
- Lau, Edward
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Reports Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 101104
- ISSN
- 2667-2375 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12296481
- OpenAlex
- W4412392975
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM146815, R01GM144456)
- National Institutes of Health (HL154959)
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (R00HL144829, R01HL141278, R01HL171711)
- Eikonizo Therapeutics
- American Heart Association (24CSA1255857)
- Small Business Innovation Research
- University of Colorado
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- deuterium labeling, heavy water labeling, induced pluripotent stem cells, pluripotency exit, cell cycle proteins, RNA-binding proteins, secretome profiling, cardiac fibroblasts, protein degradation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review