Cited by 83Refrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and EnginesThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems

Performances of the mixed-gases Joule–Thomson refrigeration cycles for cooling fixed-temperature heat loads

Gong, M.Q., Wu, J.F., Luo, E.G.·2004·Cryogenics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.05.004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gong, M. Q., Wu, J. F., & Luo, E. G.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Gong, M.Q.
Venue
Cryogenics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
847-857
ISSN
0011-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002756533
Cited by
83
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cryogenics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Keywords
Joule-Thomson effect, exergy analysis, phase separator, cryogenic cooling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review