CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 251Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automated methods for cell type annotation on scRNA-seq data

Open access
Pasquini, Giovanni, Rojo Arias, Jesus Eduardo, Schäfer, Patrick, Busskamp, Volker·2021·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
DOI 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.015PMC PMC7873570
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The advent of single-cell sequencing started a new era of transcriptomic and genomic research, advancing our knowledge of the cellular heterogeneity and dynamics. Cell type annotation is a crucial step in analyzing single-cell RNA sequencing data, yet manual annotation is time-consuming and partially subjective. As an alternative, tools have been developed for automatic cell type identification. Different strategies have emerged to ultimately associate gene expression profiles of single cells with a cell type either by using curated marker gene databases, correlating reference expression data, or transferring labels by supervised classification. In this review, we present an overview of the available tools and the underlying approaches to perform automated cell type annotations on scRNA-seq data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.015

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig 1 Approaches for cell type annotation of scRNA-seq datasets. scRNA-seq datasets can be automatically annotated by tools implementing one of three approaches: annotation by marker gene databases; correlation-based methods; and annotation by supervised classification. The task of annotating a query scRNA-seq dataset consists of assigning a cell type identity to each one of the query single cells, or to a group of cells at once i.e. an unbiasedly calculated cluster. (A) Marker gene database-based annotation takes advantage of cell type atlases. Literature- and scRNA-seq analysis-derived markers have been assembled into reference cell type hierarchies and marker lists. In this approach, basic scoring systems are used to ascribe cell types at the cluster level in the query dataset. (B) Correlation-based methods make use of multiple correlation measures to compare gene expression profiles between a reference and a query dataset, at either single-cell or cluster level, by the use of centroids (pseudo-cells obtained by averaging the single-cell gene expression level of an entire cluster). Some of these tools assemble a reference of cell type gene-expression profiles from an ensemble of published studies and bulk RNA data repositories. The annotation step in this approach consists of finding the reference cell type that best correlates to the query cell or cluster, and every tool uses multiple steps for accurately finding the best match. (C) Annotation by supervised classification uses machine learning techniques for training a classifier on reference labeled scRNA-seq datasets. The classifier is subsequently applied to the query. Supervised learning is a powerful tool for building a model distribution of training labels as a function of features. Machine learning techniques offer a variety of alternatives in the training step and allow for hierarchical classification, which permits a more biologically-relevant identification of cell types.
Fig 1 Approaches for cell type annotation of scRNA-seq datasets. scRNA-seq datasets can be automatically annotated by tools implementing one of three approaches: annotation by marker gene databases; correlation-based methods; and annotation by supervised classification. The task of annotating a query scRNA-seq dataset consists of assigning a cell type identity to each one of the query single cells, or to a group of cells at once i.e. an unbiasedly calculated cluster. (A) Marker gene database-based annotation takes advantage of cell type atlases. Literature- and scRNA-seq analysis-derived markers have been assembled into reference cell type hierarchies and marker lists. In this approach, basic scoring systems are used to ascribe cell types at the cluster level in the query dataset. (B) Correlation-based methods make use of multiple correlation measures to compare gene expression profiles between a reference and a query dataset, at either single-cell or cluster level, by the use of centroids (pseudo-cells obtained by averaging the single-cell gene expression level of an entire cluster). Some of these tools assemble a reference of cell type gene-expression profiles from an ensemble of published studies and bulk RNA data repositories. The annotation step in this approach consists of finding the reference cell type that best correlates to the query cell or cluster, and every tool uses multiple steps for accurately finding the best match. (C) Annotation by supervised classification uses machine learning techniques for training a classifier on reference labeled scRNA-seq datasets. The classifier is subsequently applied to the query. Supervised learning is a powerful tool for building a model distribution of training labels as a function of features. Machine learning techniques offer a variety of alternatives in the training step and allow for hierarchical classification, which permits a more biologically-relevant identification of cell types.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. The T.W. and Thoery C.: Past and present. J Anat Physiol 1890; 24: 253.
  2. 10.1038/s41592-019-0535-3 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 251

Related

Metadata

Authors
Pasquini, G., Rojo Arias, J. E., Schäfer, P., & Busskamp, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Busskamp, Volker
ORCID
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2021-01
Volume
19
Pages
961-969
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.015
PMC
PMC7873570
OpenAlex
W3124814274
Cited by
249
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 14
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • H2020 European Research Council (ERC-StG-678071 – ProNeurons)
  • European Research Council
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC-2068-390729961, SPP2127)
  • Volkswagen Foundation
  • Technische Universität Dresden (EXC-2151-390873048)
  • Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
cell type annotation, single-cell RNA sequencing, supervised classification, cellular heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review