Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris
Open accessAbstract
Here we present a compendium of single-cell transcriptomic data from the model organism Mus musculus that comprises more than 100,000 cells from 20 organs and tissues. These data represent a new resource for cell biology, reveal gene expression in poorly characterized cell populations and enable the direct and controlled comparison of gene expression in cell types that are shared between tissues, such as T lymphocytes and endothelial cells from different anatomical locations. Two distinct technical approaches were used for most organs: one approach, microfluidic droplet-based 3'-end counting, enabled the survey of thousands of cells at relatively low coverage, whereas the other, full-length transcript analysis based on fluorescence-activated cell sorting, enabled the characterization of cell types with high sensitivity and coverage. The cumulative data provide the foundation for an atlas of transcriptomic cell biology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 8 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Cluster co-membership alone cannot establish that two cell populations from different organs are the same or similar, because unbiased clustering may group unrelated cells.
“Cluster co-membership alone, however, is insufficient to conclude that two cell populations from different organs represent the same or similar cell types; at any given resolution, unbiased clustering that groups related cells may also group unrelated cells21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Freytag, S., Tian, L., Lonnstedt, I., Ng, M. & Bahlo, M. Comparison of clustering tools in R for medium-sized 10x Genomics single-cell RNA-sequencing data. F1000Res 7, 1297 (2018). source
The Results (Evaluation of clustering tools, Silver standard data; page unavailable) report that most clusters contained mixtures of different inferred cell types, supporting the caution that co-membership alone does not establish cell-type identity. The paper evaluates PBMC datasets, however, and does not test populations from different organs or establish that such populations were grouped together. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Brain endothelial cells showed transcriptional heterogeneity.
“transcriptional heterogeneity of brain endothelial cells”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Clusters 1-3 contain mostly single positive T cells (Cd4+ or Cd8a+).
“Clusters 1–3 contain mostly single positive T cells (Cd4+ or Cd8a+).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A cell population expressing Chodl was found in limb muscle.
“a cell population expressing Chodl in limb muscle”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Heterogeneity scores were low for the biologically sensible clusters discussed above.
“Therefore, to determine which clusters are composed of related or unrelated cell types, we computed a heterogeneity score for each cluster (Methods), and found low scores for the biologically sensible clusters discussed above (Extended Data Fig. 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Variable selection from random forests determined that 136 transcription factors are needed to simultaneously define all cell types across all organs.
“To understand which TFs were most informative for specifying cell types, we performed variable selection from random forests (Methods) and determined that 136 TFs are needed to simultaneously define all cell types across all organs (Fig. 5f, Supplementary Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The dataset contains 100,605 cells from 20 organs of 3 female and 4 male C57BL/6JN mice aged 3 months (10-15 weeks).
“The compendium is comprised of single-cell transcriptomic data from 100,605 cells isolated from 20 organs from 3 female and 4 male, C57BL/6JN, 3-month-old mice (10–15 weeks), analogous to 20-year-old humans (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clustering averaged gene expression profiles for each cell type using only the 1,016 expressed transcription factors produced a dendrogram closely resembling the one from all expressed genes, indicating that transcription factors can reconstruct known cell ontology relationships between bulk populations (entanglement = 0.11).
“The resulting dendrogram closely resembles the dendrogram produced using all expressed genes, indicating that TFs can be used to reconstruct known cell ontology relationships between bulk populations (entanglement = 0.11; Extended Data Fig. 10a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Microfluidic droplets identified cell types missed by FACS in both spleen and kidney, including kidney mesangial cells and splenic dendritic and natural killer cells.
“Nonetheless, microfluidic droplets identified cell types missed by FACS in both organs, for example kidney mesangial cells, and splenic dendritic and natural killer cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Adult mouse T cells express MHC class II genes.
“the expression of MHC class II genes by adult mouse T cells”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Ten thymus cells in cluster 3, which has 2379 cells, were annotated as leukocytes but were Pecam1+, an endothelial marker.
“For example, 10 thymus cells in cluster 3 (composed of 2379 cells) are annotated as ‘leukocytes’, but they are Pecam1+, an endothelial marker.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Several dozen to several hundred genes are shared by all methods in defining each cluster.
“However, there are several dozen to several hundred genes common to all methods which define each cluster (Extended Data Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The paper reports a collection of single-cell RNA data from the mouse, covering more than 100,000 cells across 20 organs and tissues.
“We have created a compendium of single cell transcriptomic data from the model organism Mus musculus comprising more than 100,000 cells from 20 organs and tissues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sets of transcription factors distinguish cell types across organs.
“sets of transcription factors that distinguish cell types across organs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
After quality control, 44,949 FACS cells and 55,656 microfluidic droplet cells were retained.
“Overall, 44,949 FACS cells and 55,656 microfluidic droplet cells were retained after quality control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The clustering revealed small populations of potentially mislabeled cells inside homogeneous populations.
“In addition to these heterogeneous groups, the clustering reveals small populations of potentially mislabeled cells inside homogenous populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Bulk gene expression profiles for the 33 shared cell populations largely correlated between FACS and droplet, with Pearson correlation coefficients from 0.74 to 0.90.
“Such gene expression profiles largely correlate (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.74 – 0.90), suggesting that while biases between methods exist, both accurately recapitulate average cell type gene expression profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The transcription factors used in published reprogramming methods are also found among the cell type-specific transcription factors identified here.
“Indeed, the TFs used in published methods are also found in the cell type-specific TFs found here (Supplementary Table 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 3 contains Cd5high thymic T cells possibly undergoing positive selection.
“Cluster 3 contains Cd5high thymic T cells possibly undergoing positive selection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Astrocytes and epithelial cells in cluster 53 are as different from one another as two random cells.
“In contrast, the astrocytes and epithelial cells in cluster 53 are as different from one another as two random cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The number of genes detected per cell varies between organs and methods.
“One striking feature is the variability in the number of genes detected per cell between organs and methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
As the read or UMI threshold for calling a gene detected increases, the number of detected genes falls similarly across organs.
“We also found that the number of detected genes decreases similarly across organs as the read or UMI threshold for a detectable gene is increased (Extended Data Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cluster 2 T cells also express MHC class II genes (H2-Aa, H2-Ab1).
“Interestingly, they also express MHC class II genes (H2-Aa, H2-Ab1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For some cell types, such as hepatocytes, satellite cells, and oligodendrocytes, the reprogramming factors are the top variables segregating cell types.
“For some cell types, such as hepatocytes, satellite cells, and oligodendrocytes, those reprogramming factors are the top variables segregating cell types (Fig. 5g–i).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The authors found a possible new role for Neurog3, Hex3, and Prss53 in the adult pancreas.
“Some unexpected discoveries include a potential new role for Neurog3, Hex3, and Prss53 in the adult pancreas”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Collective analysis of all FACS cells annotated as T cells revealed 5 clusters.
“To demonstrate an example of investigating common cell types across organs, we collectively analyzed all FACS cells annotated as T cells, revealing 5 clusters (Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
FACS and microfluidic droplet agree most on the genes that define each cell cluster.
“As expected, FACS and microfluidic droplet agree most, likely because they used the same biological samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
As the read or UMI threshold rises, the count of detected genes falls in a similar way across organs.
“The number of detected genes decreases similarly across organs as the read or UMI threshold is increased.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The FACS and microfluidic droplet datasets had 33 cell populations in common.
“For the 33 cell populations shared between FACS and microfluidic droplets, the average gene expression profile of each population was calculated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors created a compendium of single-cell transcriptional measurements across 20 mouse organs.
“In conclusion, we have created a compendium of single-cell transcriptional measurements across 20 mouse organs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The difference in detected genes between FACS and droplet is probably not caused by sequencing depth, because both library types are nearly saturated.
“This difference is likely not due to sequencing depth, as both FACS and microfluidic droplet libraries are nearly saturated (Extended Data Fig. 5b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Age and sex were controlled by collecting all organs from the same animals.
“4) Age and sex is controlled in our data by collecting all organs from the same animals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
By taking multiple organs from the same animal, the dataset was controlled for age, environment, and epigenetic effects.
“We analyzed multiple organs from the same animal, generating a dataset controlled for age, environment, and epigenetic effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Combining independent datasets can produce more robust characterizations of gene expression.
“This suggests that combining independent datasets can lead to more robust characterizations of gene expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Manual annotation of cell types is consistent with unbiased transcriptomic clustering for sufficiently large populations.
“Our findings also show that manual annotation of cell types is consistent with unbiased transcriptomic clustering for sufficiently large populations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The effect of cell type on measured gene expression is stronger than the effect of batch or dissociation protocol.
“This suggests that the effect of cell type on measured gene expression is stronger than the effect of batch or dissociation protocol.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The web portal allows querying gene expression in all organs simultaneously.
“2) Our web portal allows one to query gene expression in all organs simultaneously”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Organs were perfused, allowing analysis of tissue-resident immune cells.
“6) Organs were perfused allowing for the analysis of tissue- resident immune cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Both sexes are represented for all organs in the data.
“5) Both sexes are represented for all organs in our data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The greater agreement between FACS and droplet is probably because they used the same biological samples.
“As expected, FACS and microfluidic droplet agree most, likely because they used the same biological samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
It will serve as a reference of healthy young adult organs that can be used as a baseline for current and future mouse models of disease.
“It will also serve as a reference of healthy young adult organs which can be used as a baseline for current and future mouse models of disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
- May combine two claims. 45
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationCluster annotations were given in a cell ontology controlled vocabulary to support comparisons between experiments.
“For each cluster, we provide annotations in the controlled vocabulary of a cell ontology19 to facilitate inter-experiment comparisons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Bakken, T. et al. Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping. BMC Bioinformatics 18 (Suppl 17), 559 (2017). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe average sequencing depth was 814,488 reads per FACS cell and 7,709 UMIs per microfluidic droplet cell.
“Single-cell transcriptomes were sequenced to an average depth of 814,488 reads per cell (FACS) and 7,709 unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) per cell (microfluidic droplet).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBladder, liver, lung, mammary gland, trachea, tongue, and spleen showed nearly twice as many genes detected per cell with FACS as with droplet, while heart and marrow showed comparable numbers.
“The bladder, liver, lung, mammary gland, trachea, tongue, and spleen show nearly twice as many genes detected per cell with FACS compared to microfluidic droplet, whereas heart and marrow show comparable numbers (Extended Data Fig. 5a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationHan et al.'s data contains four times as many cells and includes sample types not present in the authors' data, such as neonatal and fetal organs, cell lines, and young adult ovary, peripheral blood, placenta, prostate, small intestine, stomach, testis, and uterus.
“Their data contains four times as many cells and included several sample types not present in our data, such as neonatal and fetal organs, cell lines, and young adult ovary, peripheral blood, placenta, prostate, small intestine, stomach, testis, and uterus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Han et al.20 Han, X. et al. Mapping the mouse cell atlas by microwell-seq. Cell 172, 1091–1107.e17 (2018). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe transcription factor sets that distinguish each individual cell type from all other cells vary substantially in size, from 2 to 813 factors, and are not necessarily unique to each cell type.
“We then determined the TF sets distinguishing each individual cell type from all other cells. These sets vary substantially in size (from 2 to 813 TFs) and are not necessarily unique to each cell type (Fig. 5g–i; Supplementary Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors' FACS data contains four times as many genes per cell as Han et al., and they analyzed several organs not present in Han et al., such as aorta, four brain regions, diaphragm, four fat types, four adult heart chambers, adult skin, tongue, and trachea.
“However, our FACS data contains four times as many genes per cell, and we analyzed several organs not present in the Han et al. data set, such as aorta, four brain regions, diaphragm, four fat types, four adult heart chambers, adult skin, tongue, and trachea.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Han et al.20 Han, X. et al. Mapping the mouse cell atlas by microwell-seq. Cell 172, 1091–1107.e17 (2018). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 2 contains mostly non-thymic T cells expressing the high affinity IL2 receptor (Il2ra, Il2rb), suggesting they are activated.
“while Cluster 2 contains mostly non-thymic T cells expressing the high affinity IL2 receptor (Il2ra, Il2rb), suggesting they are activated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 0 contains thymic cells undergoing VDJ recombination marked by RAG (Rag1, Rag2) and TdT (Dntt) expression, including uncommitted double positive T cells (Cd4+, Cd8a+).
“Cluster 0 comprises thymic cells undergoing VDJ recombination characterized by RAG (Rag1, Rag2) and TdT (Dntt) expression, and includes uncommitted double positive T-cells (Cd4+, Cd8a+).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 2 contained B cells from fat, limb muscle, lung, spleen, marrow, and liver, as well as cells annotated as leukocytes and lymphocytes from thymus, heart, and limb muscle.
“Cluster 2 contains B cells from fat, limb muscle, lung, spleen, marrow, and liver, but also cells annotated as leukocytes and lymphocytes from the thymus, heart, and limb muscle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn global clustering, cells from different organs often mixed, and 25 of 54 clusters contained at least five cells from distinct organs.
“As expected, cells from different organs often mixed, with 25 of 54 clusters containing (at least five) cells from distinct organs (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen the analysis used cell surface markers, RNA splicing factors, or both combined, entanglement was 0.22, 0.25, and 0.34, respectively, suggesting that none of these molecular classes define cell type as well as transcription factors do.
“In contrast, when we repeated the analysis using cell surface markers, RNA splicing factors, or the two groups combined (equivalent to a random set of genes), the entanglement was 0.22, 0.25 and 0.34, respectively, suggesting that none of these molecular classes define cell type to the extent that transcription factors do.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 1 represents mature T cells, but primarily splenic ones.
“Finally, Cluster 1 also represents mature T cells, but primarily splenic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMis-annotation seems to occur only for populations smaller than about 30 cells, which make up under 4% of the overall dataset, and this represents a lower limit of sensitivity in the current release.
“This seems only to occur for populations smaller than ~30 cells, which comprise under 4% of the overall dataset, and represents a lower limit of sensitivity in the current release of data interpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two methods differ by organ in the number of cells analyzed, reads per cell, and genes per cell.
“Comparing methods shows organ-specific differences in the number of cells analyzed (Fig. 1b, c), reads per cell (Extended Data Fig. 3a, c) and genes per cell (Extended Data Fig. 3b, d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 4 contains predominantly proliferating thymic T cells that may be pre-T cells expanding after VDJ recombination.
“Cluster 4 contains predominantly proliferating thymic T cells which may represent pre-T cells expanding following VDJ recombination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith both methods, epithelial cells and leukocytes were the most abundant cell types analyzed, but FACS captured a greater diversity of cell types.
“Furthermore, with both methods the most abundant cell types analyzed are epithelial cells and leukocytes, although FACS captured a larger diversity of cell types (Extended Data Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor cell types captured by both methods in spleen and kidney, the proportions of each cell type were equivalent, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.99 for both organs.
“For those cell types captured by both methods, the proportion of each cell type is equivalent (Pearson correlation coefficient: spleen = 0.99, kidney = 0.99).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationMedian detected genes in bladder were about 4,900 for FACS, 2,900 for droplet, and 900 for microwell-seq; in kidney they were about 1,400, 1,900, and 500, respectively.
“For example, the median number of genes detected in bladder is ~4,900 (FACS), 2,900 (droplet), and 900 (microwell-seq), while in kidney it is ~1,400 (FACS), 1,900 (droplet), and 500 (microwell-seq).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Han et al.20 Han, X. et al. Mapping the mouse cell atlas by microwell-seq. Cell 172, 1091–1107.e17 (2018). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataClusters 3 and 48 each contained endothelial cells from five or more organs, and clusters 1 and 24 contained mesenchymal and stromal cells from four or more organs.
“For example, clusters 3 and 48 each contain endothelial cells from five or more organs, and clusters 1 and 24 contain mesenchymal and stromal cells from four or more organs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe authors clearly observed dissociation-related satellite cell markers in several organs including limb muscle, but many organs showed little evidence of cellular activation.
“We clearly observed these markers in several organs including limb muscle (Extended Data Fig. 11), but many showed little evidence of cellular activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe median library saturation for all microfluidic droplet libraries was approximately 0.9.
“Dotted horizontal line demarcates the median saturation (~ 0.9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMicrofluidic droplets capture fewer molecules per cell but a greater number of cells compared with FACS.
“FACS detects more molecules per cell, but fewer cells. Microfluidic droplets detect fewer molecules per cell, but more cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe number of cells analyzed was 44,949 for FACS, 55,656 for microfluidic droplet, and 28,372 for microwell-Seq.
“Fraction of all detected genes (defined as > 0 reads or UMIs) for each cell, across all organs, detected at increasing read or UMI thresholds for FACS (left; n= 44,949 individual cells), microfluidic droplet (middle; n= 55,656 individual cells), and microwell-Seq (right; n= 28,372 individual cells).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe number of genes detected was measured in 21,105 FACS cells, 55,032 microfluidic droplet cells, and 25,891 microwell-Seq cells.
“The number of genes detected (threshold of > 0 reads or UMIs per cell) by FACS (red; n= 21,105 individual cells), microfluidic droplets (green; n = 55,032 individual cells), and microwell-Seq (blue; n= 25,891 individual cells) (Han et al.).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Han et al.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFACS captures a higher number of molecules per cell but a lower number of cells compared with microfluidic droplets.
“FACS detects more molecules per cell, but fewer cells. Microfluidic droplets detect fewer molecules per cell, but more cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDespite biases between methods, both methods accurately recapitulate average cell type gene expression profiles.
“Such gene expression profiles largely correlate (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.74 – 0.90), suggesting that while biases between methods exist, both accurately recapitulate average cell type gene expression profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAll organs were annotated using a standard method.
“All organs used a standard annotation method; an example using liver is contained in the Organ Annotation Vignette.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe release permits exact replication of all results, supports further analyses not done here, and offers a comparative framework for future studies with murine disease models.
“This release allows for the exact replication of all results, facilitates in-depth analyses not completed here, and provides a comparative framework for future studies using the large variety of murine disease models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFor nearly all reprogramming protocols, the transcription factors used also specified the targeted cell type in the data, suggesting that the data can inform novel reprogramming schemes.
“In fact, for nearly all reprogramming protocols the TFs used also specified the targeted cell type in our data (Supplementary Table 5), suggesting that our data can inform novel reprogramming schemes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHan et al. published a complementary single-cell RNA-seq study across mouse organs.
“Recently, Han et al.20 published a complementary scRNA-seq study across mouse organs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Han et al.20 Han, X. et al. Mapping the mouse cell atlas by microwell-seq. Cell 172, 1091–1107.e17 (2018). source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMany cell types in the dataset had not previously been isolated in pure populations, and the data add new information about their characteristic gene expression.
“Many of these cell types have not previously been obtained in pure populations, and our data provide a wealth of new information on their characteristic gene expression profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe cell types missed by FACS are partly explained by cellular abundance and sampling depth, and possibly by capture and lysis biases between methods.
“This is partially explained by cellular abundance and sampling depth (12,333 microfluidic droplet cells vs. 2,216 FACS cells, Supplementary Table 1), and possibly from cell capture and lysis biases between methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDissociation-related satellite cell markers are not universal, and organs likely have unique dissociation-related expression profiles.
“Therefore, the dissociation- related satellite cell markers are not universal, and organs likely display unique dissociation-related expression profiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe data are not a complete representation of all mouse organs and cell types, but they are a first draft attempt at an organism-wide representation of cellular diversity.
“While these data are by no means a complete representation of all mouse organs and cell types, they provide a first draft attempt to create an organism-wide representation of cellular diversity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe design made it possible to compare cell type composition across organs and to compare shared cell types between organs.
“This enabled the direct comparison of cell type composition between organs, and the comparison of shared cell types across organs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMost cells of similar types cluster together across organs and biological replicates, showing that batch effects are not the main source of variance in the dataset.
“The fact that most cells of similar cell types cluster together across organs and biological replicates shows that batch effects are not the main source of variance in the dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningCell types were annotated using standard cell ontology terms, enabling cross-organ and cross-experiment analyses.
“3) We annotated cell types using standard cell ontology terms, thereby enabling cross-organ and cross-experiment analyses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMHC class II was previously thought to be restricted to professional antigen presenting cells in mice, although it is known in human T cells.
“While this is known in human T cells, MHC class II was previously thought restricted to professional antigen presenting cells in mice22.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Holling, T. M., Schooten, E. & van Den Elsen, P. J. Function and regulation of MHC class II molecules in T-lymphocytes: of mice and men. Hum. Immunol. 65, 282–290 (2004). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll data, analysis, and code are freely available.
“1) All data, analysis, and code is freely available”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMis-annotation is a predictable artifact of annotating whole clusters rather than individual cells, so a rare cell type grouped with a more populous type will be mis-annotated.
“This is a predictable artifact of the annotation scheme: since entire clusters, rather than individual cells, were annotated in each organ, a sufficiently rare cell type that was algorithmically grouped with a more populous cell type will be mis-annotated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll data, protocols, analysis scripts, and an interactive browser are publicly available.
“All data, protocols, analysis scripts, and an interactive data browser are publicly shared (http://tabula-muris.ds.czbiohub.org/ ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe presence of dissociation-related gene expression changes does not prevent cell type identification or comparison of cell types across organs.
“Importantly, the presence of such gene expression changes does not prevent cell type identification or the comparison of cell types across organs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningBecause the nomenclature differed, the overlap analysis was limited to cell types that could be matched with reasonable confidence.
“As the nomenclature is not identical, the analysis was performed between cell types that could be matched with a certain degree of confidence between the three methods (Supplementary Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenLittermates were not recorded or tracked, and mice were housed at the VA VMU for no longer than 2 weeks before euthanasia.
“Littermates were not recorded or tracked, and mice were housed at the VA VMU for no longer than 2 weeks before euthanasia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSample wells were included only when their cDNA concentration was at least one standard deviation above the mean blank concentration.
“Sample wells were then selected if their cDNA concentrations were at least one standard deviation greater than the mean concentration of the blanks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSorters were calibrated with FACS buffer every day before collecting cells and after every 8 sorted plates.
“Sorters were calibrated using FACS buffer every day before collecting any cells, and also after every 8 sorted plates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataA global analysis of all FACS cells and all microfluidic droplet cells was performed to produce an unbiased clustering.
“A similar analysis was done globally for all FACS processed cells and for all microfluidic droplet processed cells to produce an unbiased clustering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAny cell with fewer than 500 detected genes was removed.
“Cells with fewer than 500 detected genes were excluded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenAlthough not exhaustive, the dataset provides a rich resource of the most highly studied organs in biology.
“While it is not an exhaustive characterization of all mouse organs, it does provide a rich dataset of the most highly studied organs in biology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTabula Muris has many uses, including discovering new putative cell types, finding novel gene expression in known cell types, and comparing cell types across organs.
“This Tabula Muris, or “Mouse Atlas”, has many uses, including the discovery of new putative cell types, the discovery of novel gene expression in known cell types, and the ability to compare cell types across organs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenFor FACS, cells with under 50,000 reads were removed; for microfluidic droplet, cells with under 1000 UMI were removed.
“Cells with fewer than 50,000 reads (FACS) or 1000 UMI (microfluidic droplet) were excluded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNo sample size choice was made before the study.
“No sample size choice was performed prior to the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenCell IDs were sorted in lexicographic order to guarantee reproducibility.
“Cells were lexicographically sorted by cell ID to ensure reproducibility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenCell types were assigned to clusters based on the abundance of known marker genes.
“Cell types were assigned to each cluster using the abundance of known marker genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenClusters that appeared to be mixtures of cell types were refined by increasing the clustering resolution or by subsetting the data and rerunning steps 3-7.
“When clusters appeared to be mixtures of cell types, they were refined either by increasing the resolution parameter for clustering or subsetting the data and rerunning steps 3–7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll animal care and procedures followed institutional guidelines approved by the VA Palo Alto Committee on Animal Research.
“All animal care and procedures were carried out in accordance with institutional guidelines approved by the VA Palo Alto Committee on Animal Research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenSample plates were included for downstream processing only when the mean blank concentration exceeded 0 ng/μl and the standard curve R2 exceeded 0.98.
“Sample plates were selected for downstream processing if the mean concentration of blanks (ERCC-containing, non-cell wells) was greater than 0 ng/μl, and, after linear regression of the values obtained from the Quant-iT dsDNA standard curve, the R2 value was greater than 0.98.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenFour 10-15 week old male and four virgin female C57BL/6JN mice were shipped from the National Institute on Aging colony at Charles River to the VA Palo Alto Veterinary Medical Unit.
“Four 10–15 week old male and four virgin female C57BL/6JN (derived from C57BL/6J in 2016) mice were shipped from the National Institute on Aging colony at Charles River to the Veterinary Medical Unit (VMU) at the VA Palo Alto (VA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTabula Muris provides a framework and description of many of the most populous and important cell populations in the mouse, and is a foundation for future studies across diverse physiological disciplines.
“Tabula Muris provides a framework and description of many of the most populous and important cell populations within the mouse, and represents a foundation for future studies across a multitude of diverse physiological disciplines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenRandomization and blinding were not performed, and the authors were aware of all data and metadata variables throughout the study.
“Randomization and blinding were not performed – the authors were aware of all data and metadata related variables during the entire course of the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIsolating viable single cells from both pancreas and liver of the same mouse was not possible, so 2 males and 2 females were used for each.
“Isolating viable single cells from both pancreas and liver of the same mouse was not possible, therefore, 2 males and 2 females were used for each.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenFull-length transcript data makes possible transcription factor, splice variant, and sequence variant analyses.
“7) Full-length transcript data makes possible transcription factor, splice variant, and sequence variant analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
It was unknown whether single-cell data from different animals, labs, and techniques could be synthesized into a general resource for biology.
“It therefore remains unknown whether these data can be synthesized as a more general resource for biology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Comparing data collected from different animals by independent labs with varying experimental techniques is challenging.
“However, while these reports provide valuable characterization of individual organs, it is challenging to compare data collected from different animals by independent labs with varying experimental techniques.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Any individual single-cell sequencing experiment offers only a partial view of cell type diversity within an organism and gene expression within each cell type.
“Any individual single-cell sequencing experiment offers only a partial view of cell type diversity within an organism and gene expression within each cell type.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tabula Muris scRNA-seq shows CD38 expression in adipose-resident macrophages but not in non-resident macrophages.
“CD38 expression was specific to adipose-tissue-resident macrophages (CD68+CD64+F4/80+CD11b+CD11c−), not the non-resident population (CD68+CD64+F4/80+CD11b+CD11c+) (Fig. 4h)”
From Senescent cells promote tissue NAD+ decline during ageing via the activation of CD38+ macrophages (2020) · cites this paper as [36]
Ageing is associated with increased activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, which is primarily expressed by myeloid immune cells, and a subsequent increase in IL-1β expression.
“Ageing is associated with increased activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome45,107, which is primarily expressed by myeloid immune cells107,108, and a subsequent increase in the expression of IL-1β, which is a major cytokine implicated in promoting ageing-related disease107.”
From NAD+ metabolism and its roles in cellular processes during ageing (2021) · cites this paper as [108]
Multiple cells in the brain, including microglia, astrocytes, neurons and endothelial cells, express CD38, and treating microglia and astrocytes with inflammatory cytokines induces CD38 expression.
“Multiple cells in the brain, including microglia, astrocytes, neurons and endothelial cells, express CD38 (REFS108,160), and treating microglia and astrocytes with inflammatory cytokines induces CD38 expression163,164.”
From NAD+ metabolism and its roles in cellular processes during ageing (2021) · cites this paper as [108]
Transcription factors are the best molecular feature for cell type definition.
“Transcription factors (TFs) have been shown to be the best molecular feature for cell type definition (Schaum et al., 2018).”
From Single-cell transcriptomes and whole-brain projections of serotonin neurons in the mouse dorsal and median raphe nuclei (2019) · cites this paper as Schaum et al., 2018
Commonly used cell surface markers are limited in their ability to define cell identities.
“Furthermore, it has been shown that commonly used cell surface markers are limited in their ability to define cell identities (Tabula Muris Consortium et al, 2018).”
From Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial (2019) · cites this paper as Tabula Muris Consortium et al, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Pancreas and liver could not both come from the same mouse
MinorThe organ list says the liver and pancreas were processed from the same mouse, whereas the methods say obtaining viable cells from both organs of one mouse was not possible.
“liver, lung, mammary gland, pancreas, skin, spleen, thymus, tongue, and trachea from the same mouse were immediately processed into single cell suspensions.”
“Isolating viable single cells from both pancreas and liver of the same mouse was not possible, therefore, 2 males and 2 females were used for each.”
Extended Data Figure 9 assigns panel a twice
MinorThe caption says the heatmaps occupy panels b-f, but its heatmap list starts at panel a. Panel a is already assigned to the barplot.
“a) Barplot showing the heterogeneity score for each cluster containing multiple cell types. b-f) Heatmaps showing the average between-cell-type distances within select clusters”
“for clusters a) 1, b) 2, c) 3, d) 24, e) 48, f) 53.”
The dissociation-gene citation points to an unrelated reference
MinorThe methods attribute the dissociation-related gene set to reference 23, but reference 23 is a paper on community detection. The paper's dissociation study is listed as reference 24.
“For each organ, principal component analysis was performed on a subset of 140 dissociation-related genes23.”
“23. Reichardt J & Bornholdt S Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 74, 016110 (2006).”
Cites
Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets.
Macosko, E. Z., Basu, A., Satija, R., Nemesh, J., Shekhar, K., Goldman, M., Tirosh, I., Bialas, A. R., Kamitaki, N., Martersteck, E. M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 · Cited by 7,110 · see citing works
Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells
Klein, A. M., Mazutis, L., Akartuna, I., Tallapragada, N., Veres, A., Li, V., Peshkin, L., Weitz, D. A., & Kirschner, M. W. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 · Cited by 3,356 · see citing works
Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq
Zeisel, A., Muñoz-Manchado, A. B., Codeluppi, S., Lönnerberg, P., La Manno, G., Juréus, A., Marques, S., Munguba, H., He, L., Betsholtz, C., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1934 · Cited by 3,124 · see citing works
Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest
Díaz‐Uriarte, R., & de Andrés, S. Á. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-3 · Cited by 2,924 · see citing works
Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors
Villani, A.-C., Satija, R., Reynolds, G., Sarkizova, S., Shekhar, K., Fletcher, J., Griesbeck, M., Butler, A., Zheng, S., Lazo, S., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4573 · Cited by 2,413 · see citing works
Unbiased classification of sensory neuron types by large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing
Usoskin, D., Furlan, A., Islam, S., Abdo, H., Lönnerberg, P., Lou, D., Hjerling-Leffler, J., Haeggström, J., Kharchenko, O., Kharchenko, P. V., et al. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3881 · Cited by 2,136 · see citing works
Dynamic Pattern Formation in a Vesicle-Generating Microfluidic Device
Thorsen, T., Roberts, R. W., Arnold, F. H., & Quake, S. R. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4163 · Cited by 2,052 · see citing works
Statistical mechanics of community detection
Reichardt, J., & Bornholdt, S. (2006) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.74.016110 · Cited by 2,048 · see citing works
A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium
Haber, A. L., Biton, M., Rogel, N., Herbst, R. H., Shekhar, K., Smillie, C., Burgin, G., Delorey, T. M., Howitt, M. R., Katz, Y., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24489 · Cited by 1,750 · see citing works
Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells
Ramsköld, D., Luo, S., Wang, Y.-C., Li, R., Deng, Q., Faridani, O. R., Daniels, G. A., Khrebtukova, I., Loring, J. F., Laurent, L. C., et al. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2282 · Cited by 1,609 · see citing works
Mapping the Mouse Cell Atlas by Microwell-Seq
Han, X., Wang, R., Zhou, Y., Fei, L., Sun, H., Lai, S., Saadatpour, A., Zhou, Z., Chen, H., Ye, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.001 · Cited by 1,597 · see citing works
Cao, J., Packer, J. S., Ramani, V., Cusanovich, D. A., Huynh, C., Daza, R., Qiu, X., Lee, C., Furlan, S. N., Steemers, F. J., et al. (2017) · doi:10.1101/104844 · Cited by 1,402 · see citing works
A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level
Darmanis, S., Sloan, S. A., Zhang, Y., Enge, M., Caneda, C., Shuer, L. M., Hayden Gephart, M. G., Barres, B. A., & Quake, S. R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1507125112 · Cited by 1,401 · see citing works
Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq
Treutlein, B., Brownfield, D. G., Wu, A. R., Neff, N. F., Mantalas, G. L., Espinoza, F. H., Desai, T. J., Krasnow, M. A., & Quake, S. R. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13173 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Single-cell sequencing reveals dissociation-induced gene expression in tissue subpopulations
van den Brink, S. C., Sage, F., Vértesy, Á., Spanjaard, B., Peterson-Maduro, J., Baron, C. S., Robin, C., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4437 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver
Halpern, K. B., Shenhav, R., Matcovitch-Natan, O., Tóth, B., Lemze, D., Golan, M., Massasa, E. E., Baydatch, S., Landen, S., Moor, A. E., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21065 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
Darmanis, S., Sloan, S. A., Croote, D., Mignardi, M., Chernikova, S. B., Samghababi, P., Zhang, Y., Neff, N. F., Kowarsky, M., Caneda, C., et al. (2017) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.030 · Cited by 1,004 · see citing works
Guo, G., Huss, M., Tong, G. Q., Wang, C., Sun, L., Clarke, N. D., & Robson, P. (2010) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.012 · Cited by 806 · see citing works
Quantitative assessment of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods
Wu, A. R., Neff, N. F., Kalisky, T., Dalerba, P., Treutlein, B., Rothenberg, M. E., Mburu, F. M., Mantalas, G. L., Sim, S., Clarke, M. F., et al. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2694 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Single-cell dissection of transcriptional heterogeneity in human colon tumors
Dalerba, P. D., Tomer Kalisky, C., Sahoo, D., Rajendran, P. S., Rothenberg, M. E., Leyrat, A. A., Sim, S., Okamoto, J., Johnston, D. M., Qian, D., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2038 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Enge, M., Arda, H. E., Mignardi, M., Beausang, J., Bottino, R., Kim, S. K., & Quake, S. R. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.004 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Whole-organism clone tracing using single-cell sequencing
Alemany, A., Florescu, M., Baron, C. S., Peterson-Maduro, J., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25969 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Cellular Taxonomy of the Mouse Striatum as Revealed by Single-Cell RNA-Seq
Gokce, O., Stanley, G. M., Treutlein, B., Neff, N. F., Camp, J. G., Malenka, R. C., Rothwell, P. E., Fuccillo, M. V., Südhof, T. C., & Quake, S. R. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.059 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Function and regulation of MHC class II molecules in T-lymphocytes: of mice and men
Holling, T. M., Schooten, E., & van Den Elsen, P. J. (2004) · Human Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2004.01.005 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Classifying Drosophila Olfactory Projection Neuron Subtypes by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
Li, H., Horns, F., Wu, B., Xie, Q., Li, J., Li, T., Luginbuhl, D. J., Quake, S. R., & Luo, L. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.019 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Comparison of clustering tools in R for medium-sized 10x Genomics single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Freytag, S., Tian, L., Lönnstedt, I., Ng, M., & Bahlo, M. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.15809.1 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomics reconstructs fate conversion from fibroblast to cardiomyocyte
Liu, Z., Wang, L., Welch, J. D., Ma, H., Zhou, Y., Vaseghi, H. R., Yu, S., Wall, J. B., Alimohamadi, S., Zheng, M., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24454 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Comparison of clustering tools in R for medium-sized 10x Genomics single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Freytag, S., Tian, L., Lönnstedt, I. M., et al. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.15809.2 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Mesa, K. R. (2015) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Cell type discovery and representation in the era of high-content single cell phenotyping
Bakken, T., Cowell, L., Aevermann, B. D., Novotny, M., Hodge, R., Miller, J. A., Lee, A., Chang, I., McCorrison, J., Pulendran, B., et al. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1977-1 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Decoding the body language of immunity: Tackling the immune system at the organism level
Chevrier, N. (2019) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2019.10.010 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Heterogeneous T cell motility behaviors emerge from a coupling between speed and turning in vivoPreprint
Jerison, E. R., & Quake, S. R. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/785964 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Cluster Headache: Comparing Clustering Tools for 10X Single Cell Sequencing Data
Freytag, S., Lonnstedt, I., Ng, M., et al. (2017) · doi:10.1101/203752
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kassambara, A. Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: unsupervised machine learning 1st edn (CreateSpace, North Charleston, 2017).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data
Stuart, T., Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Hafemeister, C., Papalexi, E., Mauck, W. M., Hao, Y., Stoeckius, M., Smibert, P., & Satija, R. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031 · Cited by 15,453 · see citing works
Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis
Hao, Y., Stuart, T., Kowalski, M. H., Choudhary, S., Hoffman, P., Hartman, A., Srivastava, A., Molla, G., Madad, S., Fernandez-Granda, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y · Cited by 5,631 · see citing works
Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial
Luecken, M. D., & Theis, F. J. (2019) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20188746 · Cited by 2,231 · see citing works
The integrated stress response: From mechanism to disease
Costa-Mattioli, M., & Walter, P. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat5314 · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
“Although HRI was long thought to have a specialized role in erythroid cells dedicated to hemoglobin synthesis (40), it is now recognized that HRI is widely expressed in several cell types and organs (41) and responds to multiple other forms of cellular cell stress, such as oxidative and mitochondrial stress, heat shoc…”
BackgroundA molecular cell atlas of the human lung from single-cell RNA sequencing
Travaglini, K. J., Nabhan, A. N., Penland, L., Sinha, R., Gillich, A., Sit, R. V., Chang, S., Conley, S. D., Mori, Y., Seita, J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2922-4 · Cited by 1,657 · see citing works
“The 58 identified cell populations included 15 epithelial (clusters 1-15), 9 endothelial (16-24), 9 stromal (25-33), and 25 immune (34-58) populations, greater than the number of classical cell types in each compartment (11 epithelial, 5 endothelial, 7 stromal, 20 immune, and 2 neuronal cell types) (Table S2).”
BackgroundA comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods
Saelens, W., Cannoodt, R., Todorov, H., & Saeys, Y. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0071-9 · Cited by 1,670 · see citing works
NAD+ metabolism and its roles in cellular processes during ageing
Covarrubias, A. J., Perrone, R., Grozio, A., & Verdin, E. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00313-x · Cited by 1,617 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptional diversity is a hallmark of developmental potential
Gulati, G. S., Sikandar, S. S., Wesche, D. J., Manjunath, A., Bharadwaj, A., Berger, M. J., Ilagan, F., Kuo, A. H., Hsieh, R. W., Cai, S., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax0249 · Cited by 1,571 · see citing works
Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science
Lähnemann, D., Köster, J., Szczurek, E., McCarthy, D. J., Hicks, S. C., Robinson, M. D., Vallejos, C. A., Campbell, K. R., Beerenwinkel, N., Mahfouz, A., et al. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1926-6 · Cited by 1,327 · see citing works
Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics
Luecken, M. D., Büttner, M., Chaichoompu, K., Danese, A., Interlandi, M., Mueller, M. F., Strobl, D. C., Zappia, L., Dugas, M., Colomé-Tatché, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01336-8 · Cited by 1,438 · see citing works
Inflammation and aging: signaling pathways and intervention therapies
Li, X., Li, C., Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Qian, P., & Huang, H. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01502-8 · Cited by 1,443 · see citing works
A single-cell transcriptomic atlas characterizes ageing tissues in the mouse
The Tabula Muris Consortium, Almanzar, N., Antony, J., Baghel, A. S., Bakerman, I., Bansal, I., Barres, B. A., Beachy, P. A., Berdnik, D., Bilen, B., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2496-1 · Cited by 1,247 · see citing works
Single-Cell Transcriptome Atlas of Murine Endothelial Cells
Kalucka, J. M., de Rooij, L. P. M. H., Goveia, J., Rohlenová, K., Dumas, S. J., Meta, E., Conchinha, N. V., Taverna, F., Teuwen, L.-A. M. N., Veys, K., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.015 · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Diversity and biology of cancer-associated fibroblasts
Biffi, G., & Tuveson, D. A. (2021) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2019 · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
A benchmark of batch-effect correction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data
Tran, H. T. N., Ang, K. S., Chevrier, M., Zhang, X., Lee, N. Y. S., Goh, M., & Chen, J. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1850-9 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
“Two independent mouse cell atlas datasets of dataset 2 are found at GEO under accession GSE108097 [31] and GSE109774 [32].”
BackgroundMethodCross-tissue immune cell analysis reveals tissue-specific features in humans
Conde, C. D., Xu, C., Jarvis, L. B., Rainbow, D. B., Wells, S. B., Gomes, T., Howlett, S. K., Suchánek, O., Polański, K., King, H. W., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl5197 · Cited by 1,165 · see citing works
Li, Q., Cheng, Z., Zhou, L., Darmanis, S., Neff, N. F., Okamoto, J., Gulati, G., Bennett, M. L., Sun, L. O., Clarke, L. E., et al. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.006 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
The art of using t-SNE for single-cell transcriptomics
Kobak, D., & Berens, P. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13056-x · Cited by 1,118 · see citing works
Construction of a human cell landscape at single-cell level
Han, X., Zhou, Z., Fei, L., Sun, H., Wang, R., Chen, Y., Chen, H., Wang, J., Tang, H., Ge, W., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2157-4 · Cited by 1,087 · see citing works
The Tabula Sapiens: A multiple-organ, single-cell transcriptomic atlas of humans
The Tabula Sapiens Consortium*, Jones, R. C., Karkanias, J., Krasnow, M. A., Pisco, A. O., Quake, S. R., Salzman, J., Yosef, N., Bulthaup, B., Brown, P., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl4896 · Cited by 1,056 · see citing works
“To address this, we developed an approach to analyzing large numbers of organs from the same individual (10), which we originally used to characterize age-related changes in gene expression in various cell types in the mouse (11).”
MethodOrchestrating single-cell analysis with Bioconductor
Amezquita, R. A., Lun, A. T. L., Becht, E., Carey, V. J., Carpp, L. N., Geistlinger, L., Marini, F., Rue-Albrecht, K., Risso, D., Soneson, C., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0654-x · Cited by 945 · see citing works
BBKNN: fast batch alignment of single cell transcriptomes
Polański, K., Young, M. D., Miao, Z., Meyer, K. B., Teichmann, S. A., & Park, J.-E. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz625 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Giotto: a toolbox for integrative analysis and visualization of spatial expression data
Dries, R., Zhu, Q., Dong, R., Eng, C.-H. L., Li, H., Liu, K., Fu, Y., Zhao, T., Sarkar, A., Bao, F., et al. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02286-2 · Cited by 921 · see citing works
“However, recent studies have also shown that identical cell types may have tissue-specific expression patterns [1, 2], indicating that the tissue environment plays an important role in mediating cell states.”
BackgroundThe role of macrophages in the resolution of inflammation
Watanabe, S., Alexander, M., Misharin, A. V., & Budinger, G. R. S. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci124615 · Cited by 925 · see citing works
Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly
Li, H., Janssens, J., Waegeneer, M. D., Kolluru, S. S., Davie, K., Gardeux, V., Saelens, W., David, F. P. A., Brbić, M., Spanier, K. I., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abk2432 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
A human brain vascular atlas reveals diverse mediators of Alzheimer’s risk
Yang, A. C., Vest, R. T., Kern, F., Lee, D. P., Agam, M., Maat, C. A., Losada, P. M., Chen, M. B., Schaum, N., Khoury, N., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04369-3 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Xiong, X., Kuang, H., Ansari, S., Liu, T., Gong, J., Wang, S., Zhao, X.-Y., Ji, Y., Li, C., Guo, L., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.028 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the aging mouse brain
Ximerakis, M., Lipnick, S. L., Innes, B. T., Simmons, S. K., Adiconis, X., Dionne, D., Mayweather, B. A., Nguyen, L., Niziolek, Z., Ozek, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0491-3 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
A human cell atlas of fetal gene expression
Cao, J., O’Day, D. R., Pliner, H. A., Kingsley, P. D., Deng, M., Daza, R. M., Zager, M. A., Aldinger, K. A., Blecher-Gonen, R., Zhang, F., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba7721 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
“We emphasize that our process for annotating cell types benefited tremendously from the myriad single-cell atlases of specific human organs or other mammals that have been generated to date (8, 9, 11, 16, 28, 50, 108, 139).”
BackgroundResultA Network of Macrophages Supports Mitochondrial Homeostasis in the Heart
Nicolás-Ávila, J. A., Lechuga-Vieco, A. V., Esteban-Martínez, L., Sánchez-Díaz, M., Díaz-García, E., Santiago, D. J., Rubio-Ponce, A., Li, J. L., Balachander, A., Quintana, J. A., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.031 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
MULTI-seq: sample multiplexing for single-cell RNA sequencing using lipid-tagged indices
McGinnis, C. S., Patterson, D. M., Winkler, J., Conrad, D. N., Hein, M. Y., Srivastava, V., Hu, J. L., Murrow, L. M., Weissman, J. S., Werb, Z., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0433-8 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Ageing hallmarks exhibit organ-specific temporal signatures
Schaum, N., Lehallier, B., Hahn, O., Pálovics, R., Hosseinzadeh, S., Lee, S. E., Sit, R., Lee, D. P., Losada, P. M., Zardeneta, M. E., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2499-y · Cited by 671 · see citing works
“(3) The corresponding gene had to be differentially expressed in the given tissue in at least one pairwise comparison between 3 months old mice and any consecutive time point (q<0.”
BackgroundDissecting cell identity via network inference and in silico gene perturbation
Kamimoto, K., Stringa, B., Hoffmann, C. M., Jindal, K., Solnica-Krezel, L., & Morris, S. A. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05688-9 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
A comparison of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data
Abdelaal, T., Michielsen, L., Cats, D., Hoogduin, D., Mei, H., Reinders, M. J. T., & Mahfouz, A. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1795-z · Cited by 628 · see citing works
“This approach proved very valuable in identifying novel cell populations and resulted in cellular maps of entire cell lineages, organs and even whole organisms [2–7].”
BackgroundTherapy-Induced Evolution of Human Lung Cancer Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
Maynard, A., McCoach, C. E., Rotow, J. K., Harris, L., Haderk, F., Kerr, D. L., Yu, E. A., Schenk, E. L., Tan, W., Zee, A., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.017 · Cited by 697 · see citing works
Xu, C., Lopez, R., Mehlman, E., Regier, J., Jordan, M. I., & Yosef, N. (2021) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20209620 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Denisenko, E., Guo, B. B., Jones, M., Hou, R., de Kock, L., Lassmann, T., Poppe, D., Clément, O., Simmons, R. K., Lister, R., et al. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02048-6 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Cross-tissue single-cell landscape of human monocytes and macrophages in health and disease
Mulder, K., Patel, A. A., Kong, W. T., Piot, C., Halitzki, E., Dunsmore, G., Khalilnezhad, S., Irac, S. E., Dubuisson, A., Chevrier, M., et al. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.07.007 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
The role of goblet cells and mucus in intestinal homeostasis
Gustafsson, J. K., & Johansson, M. (2022) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-022-00675-x · Cited by 698 · see citing works
Muhl, L., Genové, G., Leptidis, S., Liu, J., He, L., Mocci, G., Sun, Y., Gustafsson, S., Buyandelger, B., Chivukula, I. V., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17740-1 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Yang, F., Wang, W., Wang, F., Fang, Y., Tang, D., Huang, J., Lu, H., & Yao, J. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.12.05.471261 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2023 update
Nassar, L. R., Barber, G. P., Benet-Pagès, A., Casper, J., Clawson, H., Diekhans, M., Fischer, C., Gonzalez, J. N., Hinrichs, A., Lee, B. T., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Res. · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1072 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
“There are also two aggregate tracks: Tabula Sapiens (19), which contains data from the Tabula Sapiens Consortium providing an atlas of nearly 500 000 cells from 24 organs of 15 normal humans, and a Merged Cells track, which is an aggregate track created by the Genome Browser containing data from 12 papers covering 14…”
Dashti, H. S., Jones, S. E., Wood, A. R., Lane, J. M., van Hees, V. T., Wang, H., Rhodes, J. A., Song, Y., Patel, K., Anderson, S. G., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08917-4 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Mapping single-cell data to reference atlases by transfer learning
Lotfollahi, M., Naghipourfar, M., Luecken, M. D., Khajavi, M., Büttner, M., Wagenstetter, M., Avsec, Ž., Gayoso, A., Yosef, N., Interlandi, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01001-7 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Basic and Therapeutic Aspects of Angiogenesis Updated
Eelen, G., Treps, L., Li, X., & Carmeliet, P. (2020) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.120.316851 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
A lineage-resolved molecular atlas of C. elegans embryogenesis at single-cell resolution
Packer, J. S., Zhu, Q., Huynh, C., Sivaramakrishnan, P., Preston, E. A., Dueck, H. R., Stefanik, D. J., Tan, K., Trapnell, C., Kim, J., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax1971 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
“Numbers 1-13 indicate parents of 1 ADE-ADA, 2 CEP-URX 3 IL1 4 OLL 5 OLQ 6 ASJ-AUA 7 ASE 8 ASI 9 ASK 10 ADF-AWB 11 ASG-AWA 12 ADL 13 AFD-RMD.”
Dick, S. A., Wong, A., Hamidzada, H., Nejat, S., Nechanitzky, R., Vohra, S., Mueller, B., Zaman, R., Kantores, C., Aronoff, L., et al. (2022) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abf7777 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
Transcriptional and Cellular Diversity of the Human Heart
Tucker, N. R., Chaffin, M., Fleming, S. J., Hall, A. W., Parsons, V. A., Bedi, K. C., Akkad, A.-D., Herndon, C. N., Arduini, A., Papangeli, I., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.045401 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
“Some recent analyses of heart tissue from humans [5,6] and model systems [4,7] have recently been published, but are limited in scope.”
BackgroundUltra‐high sensitivity mass spectrometry quantifies single‐cell proteome changes upon perturbation
Brunner, A., Thielert, M., Vasilopoulou, C., Ammar, C., Coscia, F., Mund, A., Hoerning, O. B., Bache, N., Apalategui, A., Lubeck, M., et al. (2022) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.202110798 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
“While microscopy has always been single-cell based, specialized deep sequencing technologies have achieved this for systems biological approaches (Smith et al , 2010; Ramsko¨ld et al , 2012; Jaitin et al , 2014; Schnitzbauer et al , 2017; Schaum et al , 2018; Lundberg & Borner, 2019).”
Vascular endothelial cell development and diversity
Trimm, E., & Red-Horse, K. (2023) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-022-00770-1 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Genetic identification of vagal sensory neurons that control feeding
Bai, L., Mesgarzadeh, S., Ramesh, K. S., Huey, E. L., Liu, Y., Gray, L. A., Aitken, T. J., Chen, Y., Beutler, L. R., Ahn, J. S., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.031 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Horowitz, A. M., Fan, X., Bieri, G., Smith, L. K., Sanchez-Diaz, C. I., Schroer, A. B., Gontier, G., Casaletto, K. B., Kramer, J. H., Williams, K. E., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw2622 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Capillary cell-type specialization in the alveolus
Gillich, A., Zhang, F., Farmer, C. G., Travaglini, K. J., Tan, S. Y., Gu, M., Zhou, B., Feinstein, J. A., Krasnow, M. A., & Metzger, R. J. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2822-7 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Molecular characterization of selectively vulnerable neurons in Alzheimer’s disease
Leng, K., Li, E., Eser, R., Piergies, A., Sit, R., Tan, M., Neff, N., Li, S. H., Rodriguez, R. D., Suemoto, C. K., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00764-7 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Benchmarking single-cell RNA-sequencing protocols for cell atlas projects
Mereu, E., Lafzi, A., Moutinho, C., Ziegenhain, C., McCarthy, D. J., Álvarez-Varela, A., Batlle, E., Sagar, Grün, D., Lau, J. K., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0469-4 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Determinants of resident tissue macrophage identity and function
Blériot, C., Chakarov, S., & Ginhoux, F. (2020) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.014 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Supervised classification enables rapid annotation of cell atlases
Pliner, H. A., Shendure, J., & Trapnell, C. (2019) · doi:10.1101/538652 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Physiological blood–brain transport is impaired with age by a shift in transcytosis
Yang, A. C., Stevens, M. Y., Chen, M. B., Lee, D. P., Stähli, D., Gate, D., Contrepois, K., Chen, W., Iram, T., Zhang, L., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2453-z · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Katzenelenbogen, Y., Sheban, F., Yalin, A., Yofe, I., Svetlichnyy, D., Jaitin, D. A., Bornstein, C., Moshe, A., Keren-Shaul, H., Cohen, M., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.032 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
What is a cell type and how to define it?
Zeng, H. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.031 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
CD22 blockade restores homeostatic microglial phagocytosis in ageing brains
Pluvinage, J. V., Haney, M. S., Smith, B. A. H., Sun, J., Iram, T., Bonanno, L., Li, L., Lee, D. P., Morgens, D. W., Yang, A. C., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1088-4 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Li, B., Zhang, W., Guo, C., Xu, H., Li, L., Fang, M., Hu, Y., Zhang, X., Yao, X., Tang, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01480-9 · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Parker, K. R., Migliorini, D., Perkey, E., Yost, K. E., Bhaduri, A., Bagga, P., Haris, M., Wilson, N. E., Liu, F., Gabunia, K., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.022 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Low-Dose Radiotherapy Reverses Tumor Immune Desertification and Resistance to Immunotherapy
Herrera, F. G., Ronet, C., Ochoa-de-Olza, M., Barras, D., Crespo, I., Andreatta, M., Corria-Osorio, J., Spill, A., Benedetti, F., Genolet, R., et al. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0003 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Applications of single-cell RNA sequencing in drug discovery and development
de Sande, B. V., Lee, J. S., Mutasa-Gottgens, E., Naughton, B. J., Bacon, W., Manning, J. R., Wang, Y., Pollard, J. R., Mendez, M., Hill, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-023-00688-4 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Exercise plasma boosts memory and dampens brain inflammation via clusterin
De Miguel, Z., Khoury, N., Betley, M. J., Lehallier, B., Willoughby, D., Olsson, N., Yang, A. C., Hahn, O., Lu, N., Vest, R. T., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04183-x · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Kaminow, B., Yunusov, D., & Dobin, A. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.05.05.442755 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Structural cells are key regulators of organ-specific immune responses
Krausgruber, T., Fortelny, N., Fife-Gernedl, V., Senekowitsch, M., Schuster, L. C., Lercher, A., Nemc, A., Schmidl, C., Rendeiro, A. F., Bergthaler, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2424-4 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Wosczyna, M. N., Konishi, C. T., Carbajal, E. E. P., Wang, T. T., Walsh, R. A., Gan, Q., Wagner, M. W., & Rando, T. A. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.074 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Immunometabolism and natural killer cell responses
O’Brien, K., & Finlay, D. K. (2019) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0139-2 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Neuronal regulation of the blood–brain barrier and neurovascular coupling
Kaplan, L., Chow, B. W., & Gu, C. (2020) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0322-2 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Senescent cells promote tissue NAD+ decline during ageing via the activation of CD38+ macrophages
Covarrubias, A. J., Kale, A., Perrone, R., Lopez-Dominguez, J. A., Pisco, A. O., Kasler, H. G., Schmidt, M. S., Heckenbach, I., Kwok, R., Wiley, C. D., et al. (2020) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-020-00305-3 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Genetic Insights Into Biological Mechanisms Governing Human Ovarian Ageing
Ruth, K. S., Day, F. R., Hussain, J., Martínez-Marchal, A., Aiken, C., Azad, A., Thompson, D. J., Knoblochová, L., Abe, H., Tarry‐Adkins, J. L., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03779-7 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Activated fibroblasts in cancer: Perspectives and challenges
Caligiuri, G., & Tuveson, D. A. (2023) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.015 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Song, W., Wang, J., Wang, T., Xiong, X., Qi, Z., Fu, W., Yang, X., & Chen, Y.-G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20191130 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Embracing the dropouts in single-cell RNA-seq analysis
Qiu, P. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14976-9 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities
Bunne, C., Roohani, Y., Rosen, Y., Gupta, A., Zhang, X., Roed, M., Alexandrov, T., AlQuraishi, M., Brennan, P., Burkhardt, D. B., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.015 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
High-Dimensional Single-Cell Cartography Reveals Novel Skeletal Muscle-Resident Cell Populations
Giordani, L., He, G. J., Négroni, E., Sakai, H., Law, J. Y. C., Siu, M. M., Wan, R., Corneau, A., Tajbakhsh, S., Cheung, T. H., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.026 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Single cell transcriptomics comes of age
Aldridge, S., & Teichmann, S. A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18158-5 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Integrative spatial analysis reveals a multi-layered organization of glioblastoma
Greenwald, A., Darnell, N. G., Hoefflin, R., Simkin, D., Mount, C., Castro, L. N. G., Harnik, Y., Dumont, S. D., Hirsch, D., Nomura, M., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.029 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Probabilistic cell-type assignment of single-cell RNA-seq for tumor microenvironment profiling
Zhang, A. W., O’Flanagan, C. H., Chavez, E. A., Lim, J. L., Ceglia, N., McPherson, A., Wiens, M., Walters, P., Chan, T., Hewitson, B., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0529-1 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Sárvári, A. K., Hauwaert, E. L. V., Markussen, L. K., Gammelmark, E., Marcher, A.-B., Ebbesen, M. F., Nielsen, R., Brewer, J. R., Madsen, J. G. S., & Mandrup, S. (2020) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.12.004 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Droplet Microfluidics
Ding, Y., Howes, P. D., & deMello, A. J. (2019) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05047 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Tan, Y., & Cahan, P. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.06.004 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Single-cell proteomics enabled by next-generation sequencing or mass spectrometry
Bennett, H. M., Stephenson, W., Rose, C. M., & Darmanis, S. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01791-5 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
The cell biology of synapse formation
Südhof, T. C. (2021) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202103052 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Lineage plasticity in prostate cancer depends on JAK/STAT inflammatory signaling
Chan, J. M., Zaidi, S., Love, J. R., Zhao, J. L., Setty, M. N., Wadosky, K. M., Gopalan, A., Choo, Z.-N., Persad, S., Choi, J., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn0478 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Joint analysis of heterogeneous single-cell RNA-seq dataset collections
Barkas, N., Petukhov, V., Nikolaeva, D., Lozinsky, Y., Demharter, S., Khodosevich, K., & Kharchenko, P. V. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0466-z · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Genetic mapping of cell type specificity for complex traits
Watanabe, K., Mirkov, M. U., de Leeuw, C., van den Heuvel, M. P., & Posthuma, D. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11181-1 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Caloric Restriction Reprograms the Single-Cell Transcriptional Landscape of Rattus Norvegicus Aging
Ma, S., Sun, S., Geng, L., Song, M., Wang, W., Ye, Y., Ji, Q., Zou, Z., Wang, S., He, X., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.008 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
An intercrypt subpopulation of goblet cells is essential for colonic mucus barrier function
Nyström, E. E. L., Martínez‐Abad, B., Arike, L., Birchenough, G. M. H., Nonnecke, E. B., Castillo, P. A., Svensson, F. R., Bevins, C. L., Hansson, G. C., & Johansson, M. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb1590 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Martini, E., Kunderfranco, P., Peano, C., Carullo, P., Cremonesi, M., Schorn, T., Carriero, R., Termanini, A., Colombo, F. S., Jachetti, E., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.119.041694 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
COVID-19 and the Chemical Senses: Supporting Players Take Center Stage
Cooper, K. W., Brann, D. H., Farruggia, M. C., Bhutani, S., Pellegrino, R., Tsukahara, T., Weinreb, C., Joseph, P. V., Larson, E. D., Parma, V., et al. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.032 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
A systems view of the vascular endothelium in health and disease
Augustin, H. G., & Koh, G. Y. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.012 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Kalluri, A. S., Vellarikkal, S. K., Edelman, E. R., Nguyễn, L., Subramanian, A., Ellinor, P. T., Regev, A., Kathiresan, S., & Gupta, R. M. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.038362 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Meflin-Positive Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Inhibit Pancreatic Carcinogenesis
Mizutani, Y., Kobayashi, H., Iida, T., Asai, N., Masamune, A., Hara, A., Esaki, N., Ushida, K., Mii, S., Shiraki, Y., et al. (2019) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-0454 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Inflammatory Cytokine TNFα Promotes the Long-Term Expansion of Primary Hepatocytes in 3D Culture
Peng, W. C., Logan, C. Y., Fish, M., Anbarchian, T., Aguisanda, F., Álvarez-Varela, A., Wu, P., Jin, Y., Zhu, J., Li, B., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.012 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
An exercise-inducible metabolite that suppresses feeding and obesity
Li, V. L., He, Y., Contrepois, K., Liu, H., Kim, J. T., Wiggenhorn, A. L., Tanzo, J. T., Tung, A. S.-H., Lyu, X., Zushin, P.-J. H., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04828-5 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Moragues, T., Mendoza, D. A., Beneyton, T., Modavi, C., Simutis, K., Abate, A. R., Baret, J., deMello, A. J., Densmore, D. M., & Griffiths, A. D. (2023) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-023-00212-3 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
- Authors
- The Tabula Muris Consortium, coordination, O., coordination, L., processing, O. C. A., sequencing, L. P. A., analysis, C. D., annotation, C. T., Writing group, Supplemental text writing group, & Principal investigators
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 562
- Issue
- 7727
- Pages
- 367-372
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC6642641
- OpenAlex
- W2894687190
- Cited by
- 3,326
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 266 · 2025: 394 · 2024: 399 · 2023: 397 · 2022: 412 · 2021: 443 · 2020: 402 · 2019: 178 · 2018: 15 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 102.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Keywords
- Tabula Muris, mouse organs, single-cell transcriptomics, cell types, gene expression, cell atlas, T cells, endothelial cells
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Biology, Female, Flow Cytometry, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Organ Specificity, T-Lymphocytes, Transcription Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review