Cited by 1Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DrugDomain 2.0: Comprehensive database of protein domains-ligands/drugs interactions across the whole Protein Data Bank

Open access
Medvedev, Kirill E., Schaeffer, R. Dustin, Grishin, Nick V.·2025·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Proteins carry out essential cellular functions - signaling, metabolism, transport - through the specific interaction of small molecules and drugs within their three-dimensional structural domains. Protein domains are conserved folding units that, when combined, drive evolutionary progress. The Evolutionary Classification Of protein Domains (ECOD) places domains into a hierarchy explicitly built around distant evolutionary relationships, enabling the detection of remote homologs across the proteomes. Yet no single resource has systematically mapped domain-ligand interactions at the structural level. To fill this gap, we introduce DrugDomain v2.0, an updated comprehensive resource, that extends earlier releases by linking evolutionary domain classifications (ECOD) to ligand binding events across the entire Protein Data Bank. We also leverage AI-driven predictions from AlphaFold to extend domain-ligand annotations to human drug targets lacking experimental structures. DrugDomain v2.0 catalogs interactions with over 37,000 PDB ligands and 7,560 DrugBank molecules, integrates more than 6,000 small-molecule-associated post-translational modifications, and provides context for 14,000+ PTM-modified human protein models featuring docked ligands. The database encompasses 43,023 unique UniProt accessions and 174,545 PDB structures. The DrugDomain data is available online: https://drugdomain.cs.ucf.edu/ and https://github.com/kirmedvedev/DrugDomain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.09.018

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4335 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.str.2006.11.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/nar/gkz1064 · DOI
  4. Waman V.P., Bordin N., Alcraft R., Vickerstaff R., Rauer C., Chan Q. et al: CATH 2024: CATH-AlphaFlow doubles the number of structures in CATH and reveals nearly 200 new folds. J Mol Biol 2024; 436: 168551. · DOI
  5. 10.1093/nar/gkae1029 · DOI
  6. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011586 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Schaeffer R.D., Zhang J., Kinch L.N., Pei J., Cong Q. and Grishin N.V.: Classification of domains in predicted structures of the human proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2023; 120: e2214069120. · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.adq4946 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Medvedev K.E., Schaeffer R.D., Chen K.S. and Grishin N.V.: Pan-cancer structurome reveals overrepresentation of beta sandwiches and underrepresentation of alpha helical domains. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 11988. · DOI
  10. Medvedev K.E., Schaeffer R.D. and Grishin N.V.: DrugDomain: the evolutionary context of drugs and small molecules bound to domains. Protein Sci 2024; 33: e5116. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Medvedev K.E., Schaeffer R.D. and Grishin N.V.: Leveraging AI to explore structural contexts of post-translational modifications in drug binding. J Chemin 2025; 17: 67. · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Westbrook J.D., Shao C., Feng Z., Zhuravleva M., Velankar S. and Young J.: The chemical component dictionary: complete descriptions of constituent molecules in experimentally determined 3D macromolecules in the protein data bank. Bioinformatics 2015; 31: 1274. · DOI
  14. Piehl D.W., Vallat B., Truong I., Morsy H., Bhatt R., Blaumann S. et al: rcsb-api: python toolkit for streamlining access to RCSB protein data bank APIs. J Mol Biol 2025; 437: 168970. · DOI
  15. 10.1093/nar/gkad976 · DOI
  16. Kim S., Chen J., Cheng T., Gindulyte A., He J., He S. et al: PubChem 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53: D1516. · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkad1004 · DOI
  18. Liu T., Hwang L., Burley S.K., Nitsche C.I., Southan C., Walters W.P. et al: BindingDB in 2024: a FAIR knowledgebase of protein-small molecule binding data. Nucleic Acids Res 2025; 53: D1633. · DOI
  19. Djoumbou Feunang Y., Eisner R., Knox C., Chepelev L., Hastings J., Owen G. et al: ClassyFire: automated chemical classification with a comprehensive, computable taxonomy. J Chemin 2016; 8: 61. · DOI
  20. 10.1021/ci200227u · DOI
  21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41592-022-01685-y · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1126/science.adl2528 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Discovery C., Boitreaud J., Dent J., McPartlon M., Meier J., Reis V. et al: Chai-1: decoding the molecular interactions of life. bioRxiv2024 2024; . 10.10.615955..
  25. 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
  26. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System : Version 3.0 Schrödinger. : LLC. Accessed January 2024.
  27. 10.1155/2017/9351507 · DOI
  28. Magne F., Gotteland M., Gauthier L., Zazueta A., Pesoa S., Navarrete P. et al: The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio: a relevant marker of gut dysbiosis in obese patients?. Nutrients 2020; 12. · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/4441022a · DOI · Paper page
  30. Procopio R.E., Silva I.R., Martins M.K., Azevedo J.L. and Araujo J.M.: Antibiotics produced by streptomyces. Braz J Infect Dis 2012; 16: 466. · DOI
  31. Luque C., Cepero A., Perazzoli G., Mesas C., Quinonero F., Cabeza L. et al: In vitro efficacy of extracts and isolated bioactive compounds from ascomycota fungi in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Pharm (Basel) 2022; 16.
  32. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007569 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.166788 · DOI
  34. 10.1042/BCJ20220217 · DOI
  35. Medvedev K.E., Schaeffer R.D., Pei J. and Grishin N.V.: Pathogenic mutation hotspots in protein kinase domain structure. Protein Sci 2023; 32: e4750. · DOI
  36. Zapf C.W., Bloom J.D., McBean J.L., Dushin R.G., Nittoli T., Otteng M. et al: Macrocyclic lactams as potent Hsp90 inhibitors with excellent tumor exposure and extended biomarker activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2011; 21: 3411. · DOI
  37. Grundy S.M. and Stone N.J.: 2018 American heart Association/American college of cardiology multisociety guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: primary prevention. JAMA Cardiol 2019; 4: 488. · DOI
  38. 10.1038/35101544 · DOI
  39. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg7859 · DOI
  40. Kruger F.A., Rostom R. and Overington J.P.: Mapping small molecule binding data to structural domains. BMC Bioinforma 13 Suppl 2012; 17: S11. · DOI
  41. Li M., Li Y., Lu Y., Li J., Lu X., Ren Y. et al: Molecular basis of Mg(2+) permeation through the human mitochondrial Mrs2 channel. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 4713. · DOI
  42. Auwercx J., Rybarczyk P., Kischel P., Dhennin-Duthille I., Chatelain D., Sevestre H. et al: Mg(2+) transporters in digestive cancers. Nutrients 2021; 13. · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41594-024-01432-1 · DOI
  44. Noda N.N., Satoo K., Fujioka Y., Kumeta H., Ogura K., Nakatogawa H. et al: Structural basis of Atg8 activation by a homodimeric E1, Atg7. Mol Cell 2011; 44: 462. · DOI
  45. Campanello G.C., Ruetz M., Dodge G.J., Gouda H., Gupta A., Twahir U.T. et al: Sacrificial Cobalt-Carbon bond homolysis in coenzyme B(12) as a cofactor conservation strategy. J Am Chem Soc 2018; 140: 13205. · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41586-018-0680-3 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Mittelstadt G., Jiao W., Livingstone E.K., Moggre G.J., Nazmi A.R. and Parker E.J.: A dimeric catalytic core relates the short and long forms of ATP-phosphoribosyltransferase. Biochem J 2018; 475: 247. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Medvedev, K. E., Schaeffer, R. D., & Grishin, N. V.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Medvedev, Kirill E.
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2025-01-01
Volume
27
Pages
4040-4047
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414625508
Cited by
1
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM127390, GM147367)
  • Welch Foundation (I-1505)
  • University of Central Florida
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Science Foundation (DBI 2224128)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein domains, drug binding, Protein Data Bank, ECOD, AlphaFold, post-translational modification, therapeutic target, protein-ligand docking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review