Cited by 9Protein purification and stabilityComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine learning driven acceleration of biopharmaceutical formulation development using Excipient Prediction Software (ExPreSo)

Open access
Vidal-Henriquez, Estefania, Holder, Thomas, Lee, Nicholas Franciss, Pompe, Cornelius, Teese, Mark George·2025·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Formulation development of protein biopharmaceuticals has become increasingly challenging due to new modalities and higher target drug substance concentrations. The limited amount of drug substance available during development, coupled with extensive analytical requirements, restrict the number of excipients that can be empirically screened. There is a strong need for in silico tools to optimize excipient pre-selection before wet lab experiments. Here, we introduce Excipient Prediction Software (ExPreSo), a supervised machine learning algorithm that suggests excipients based on the properties of the protein drug substance and target product profile. ExPreSo was trained on a dataset comprising 335 regulatory-approved peptide and protein drug products. Predictive features included protein structural properties, protein language model embeddings, and drug product characteristics. ExPreSo showed good performance for the nine most prevalent excipients in biopharmaceutical formulations and minimal overfitting. A fast variant of ExPreSo using only sequence-based input features showed similar prediction power to slower models that relied on molecular modeling. Notably, an ExPreSo variant using only protein-based input features also showed good performance, indicating resilience to the influence of platform formulations. To our knowledge, this is the first machine learning algorithm to suggest biopharmaceutical excipients based on the dataset of regulatory-approved drug products. Overall, ExPreSo shows great potential to reduce the time, costs, and risks associated with excipient screening during formulation development. Abstract Figure

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.10.026

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1002/jps.10154 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.03.004 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.xphs.2023.03.026 · DOI
  4. 10.1080/19420862.2023.2285277 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/19420862.2023.2211185 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.11.008 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/19420862.2023.2205540 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124877 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nrd3581 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/s41573-023-00709-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/bib/bbae307 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/19420862.2023.2185924 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102343 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/19420862.2023.2171248 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s43393-021-00024-0 · DOI
  16. 10.3390/ijms17060853 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.ejps.2023.106625 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s11095-019-2642-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00545 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/19420862.2020.1816312 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00859 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00135 · DOI
  23. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.689400 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.12.015 · DOI
  25. 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00913 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00629 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00775 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/19420862.2023.2212416 · DOI
  29. Li X. Orr A.A. Sajadi M.M. et al. Investigating the interaction between excipients and monoclonal antibodies PGT121 and N49P9.6-FR-LS: A comprehensive analysis. ChemRxiv. doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-1zv1q. · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.10.051 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.04.002 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/bib/bbad419 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.122839 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s11095-020-02919-4 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.03.017 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/abt/tbab027 · DOI
  37. 10.1186/s12859-019-3220-8 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1002/pro.4497 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1038/s41598-020-80786-0 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Pedregosa F. Varoquaux G. Gramfort A. et al: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 2011; 12: 2825. 〈http://scikit-learn.sourceforge.net〉.
  44. 10.1080/19420862.2023.2248671 · DOI
  45. 10.1613/jair.953 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI
  48. Lundberg S.M. and Lee S.I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30. Edited by I. Guyon, U.V. Luxburg, S. Bengio et al. : Curran Associates, Inc. 2017: 4765. 〈http://papers.nips.cc/paper/7062-a-unified-approach-to-interpreting-model-predictions.pdf〉.
  49. 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Vidal-Henriquez, E., Holder, T., Lee, N. F., Pompe, C., & Teese, M. G.
Affiliations
LEUKOCARE AG, Am Klopferspitz 19a, 82152 Martinsried, Munich, Germany
Corresponding author
Teese, Mark George
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2025-01-01
Volume
27
Pages
4517-4525
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415197028
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Colorado Boulder
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
excipient selection, protein language model embeddings, protein structural properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review