The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved biclustering of microarray data demonstrated through systematic performance tests
Open accessAbstract
A new algorithm is presented for fitting the plaid model, a biclustering method developed for clustering gene expression data. The approach is based on speedy individual differences clustering and uses binary least squares to update the cluster membership parameters, making use of the binary constraints on these parameters and simplifying the other parameter updates. The performance of both algorithms is tested on simulated data sets designed to imitate (normalised) gene expression data, covering a range of biclustering configurations. Empirical distributions for the components of these data sets, including non-systematic error, are derived from a real set of microarray data. A set of two-way quality measures is proposed, based on one-way measures commonly used in information retrieval, to evaluate the quality of a retrieved bicluster with respect to a target bicluster in terms of both genes and samples. By defining a one-to-one correspondence between target biclusters and retrieved biclusters, the performance of each algorithm can be assessed. The results show that, using appropriately selected starting criteria, the proposed algorithm out-performs the original plaid model algorithm across a range of data sets. Furthermore, through the rigorous assessment of the plaid model a benchmark for future evaluation of biclustering methods is established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data
Smyth, G. K. (2005) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/0-387-29362-0_23 · Cited by 5,796
'Gene shaving' as a method for identifying distinct sets of genes with similar expression patterns
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Eisen, M. B., Alizadeh, A., Levy, R., Staudt, L., Chan, W. C., Botstein, D., & Brown, P. (2000) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2000-1-2-research0003 · Cited by 547 · cited 2×
“These include gene-shaving (Hastie et al., 2000), a one-way overlapping clustering method; context-speci4c Bayesian clustering (Barash and Friedman, 2002), a one-way clustering method in which clusters may be based on di6erent subsets of samples; EMMIX-GENE (McLachlan et al.”
Method
Cited by
Nonsmooth nonnegative matrix factorization (nsNMF)
Pascual-Montano, A., Carazo, J. M., Kochi, K., Lehmann, D., & Pascual-Marqui, R. D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2006.60 · Cited by 419
Biclustering Methods: Biological Relevance and Application in Gene Expression Analysis
Oghabian, A., Kilpinen, S., Hautaniemi, S., & Czeizler, E. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090801 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, H., Bailey, T., & Krzanowski, W.
- Venue
- Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-254
- ISSN
- 0167-9473 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023416945
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved biclustering of microarray data demonstrated through systematic performance tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.csda.2004.02.003
- The paper
- Turner, H., Bailey, T., & Krzanowski, W. (2005). Improved biclustering of microarray data demonstrated through systematic performance tests. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.