Cited by 21Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies

A pragmatic multi-centred randomised controlled trial of yoga for chronic low back pain: trial protocol

Open access
Cox, Helen, Tilbrook, Helen, Aplin, John, Chuang, Ling-Hsiang, Hewitt, Catherine, Jayakody, Shalmini, Semlyen, Anna, Soares, Marta O. +4 more·2010·Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A systematic review revealed three small randomised controlled trials of yoga for low back pain, all of which showed effects on back pain that favoured the yoga group. To build on these studies a larger trial, with longer term follow-up, and a number of different yoga teachers delivering the intervention is required. This study protocol describes the details of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Yoga for chronic Low Back Pain, which is funded by Arthritis Research Campaign (arc) and is being conducted by the University of York. 262 patients will be recruited from GP practices in 5 centres in England. Patients will be randomised to receive usual care or 12 weekly classes of yoga. A yoga programme will be devised that can be delivered by yoga teachers of the two main national yoga organisations in the UK (British Wheel of Yoga and Iyengar Yoga Association (UK)). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials registry ISRCTN81079604 (date registered 30/03/2007).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.09.010

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The protocol for this systematic review was published previously by these authors.

    “The protocol for this study was published previously by these authors.8”

    From Productivity outcomes from chronic pain management interventions in the working age population; a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Abstract identifies this paper as the protocol for a randomised controlled trial of yoga for chronic low back pain, not a systematic review. The Background mentions a systematic review the authors undertook, but does not present a protocol for it. The verbatim citing sentence says only “this study”; the supplied claim’s identification of that study as a systematic review is what the source contradicts. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]Nicholas MK. Self-efficacy and chronic pain. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society. St. Andrews; 1989.
  2. [15]Torgerson D.J. Sibbald B. What is a patient preference design? BMJ 316 1998 36 PMC2665528 9487173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, H., Tilbrook, H., Aplin, J., Chuang, L.-H., Hewitt, C., Jayakody, S., Semlyen, A., Soares, M. O., Torgerson, D., Trewhela, A., Watt, I., & Worthy, G.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Tilbrook, Helen
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
76-80
ISSN
1744-3881 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157081180
Cited by
21
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Versus Arthritis (17727)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Keywords
yoga, chronic low back pain, yoga teachers, Iyengar yoga, cost-effectiveness, pain management, exercise therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Clinical Protocols, England, Humans, Middle Aged, Research Design, Yoga, Single-Blind Method, Low Back Pain, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review