Cited by 6Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Effectiveness of mind-body medicine for Hwa-Byung (a Korean cultural diagnosis of suppressed anger): A systematic review of interventional studies

Open access
Kwon, Chan-Young, Lee, Boram·2024·Complementary Therapies in Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review analysed the effectiveness of mind-body modalities (MBMs) in Hwa-byung (HB). METHODS: Ten electronic databases were searched. Intervention studies using MBMs for individuals with HB, published up to July 2023, were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane RoB and ROBINS-I tools. Meta-analysis of continuous variables was presented as mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Nine studies including five randomized controlled clinical trials, were included. The MBM types were meditation, relaxation, biofield therapy, art therapy, and forest-based MBM, and comprehensive HB programs. Most studies used an MBM group, with 5-6 sessions delivered during an average of 4-5 weeks. As a result of the meta-analysis, art therapy showed a statistically significantly better effect on improving the Hwa-Byung Scale (HB-S) score compared to the waitlist control (MD = -7.74; 95% CI = -9.81 to -5.66). In the before-and-after comparison, MBMs were frequently reported to have significant benefits for improving the HB-S total score (7/7, 100%), depressive mood (4/5, 80%), and state anxiety (6/8, 75%). Some methodological flaws were identified in the included studies, including the reliability of diagnosis, non-implementation of assessor blinding, and inappropriate control groups. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified potentially promising MBMs that were not previously recommended in the current HB clinical practice guidelines. In the future, high-quality clinical studies that include the use of standardized HB diagnostic criteria, homogeneous interventions, appropriate control groups, standard assessment tools such as the HB-S, and assessor blinding are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103016

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Authors
Kwon, C.-Y., & Lee, B.
Affiliations
  • Dong-Eui University (KR)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kwon, Chan-Young
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
80
Pages
103016
ISSN
0965-2299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390629491
Cited by
5
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health and Welfare (HI23C1403)
  • Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
Hwa-byung, anger suppression, mind-body medicine, art therapy, meditation, relaxation training, biofield energy healing, depressive mood, state anxiety, complementary interventions
MeSH terms
Anger, Anxiety, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Mind-Body Therapies, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review