The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Local Genetic Diversity and Low Outcrossing Rate in Caenorhabditis elegans Natural Populations
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Caenorhabditis elegans is a major model system in biology, yet very little is known about its biology outside the laboratory. In particular, its unusual mode of reproduction with self-fertile hermaphrodites and facultative males raises the question of its frequency of outcrossing in natural populations. RESULTS We describe the first analysis of C. elegans individuals sampled directly from natural populations. C. elegans is found predominantly in the dauer stage and with a very low frequency of males versus hermaphrodites. Whereas C. elegans was previously shown to display a low worldwide genetic diversity, we find by comparison a surprisingly high local genetic diversity of C. elegans populations; this local diversity is contributed in great part by immigration of new alleles rather than by mutation. Our results on heterozygote frequency, male frequency, and linkage disequilibrium furthermore show that selfing is the predominant mode of reproduction in C. elegans natural populations but that infrequent outcrossing events occur, at a rate of approximately 1%. CONCLUSIONS Our results give a first insight in the biology of C. elegans in the natural populations. They demonstrate that local populations of C. elegans are genetically diverse and that a low frequency of outcrossing allows for the recombination of these locally diverse genotypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hudson, R. R., & Kaplan, N. L. (1985) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/111.1.147 · Cited by 1,555
Cited by
The natural history of Caenorhabditis elegans
Félix, M.-A., & Braendle, C. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.09.050 · Cited by 458
Self-citationChromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity
Andersen, E. C., Gerke, J. P., Shapiro, J. A., Crissman, J. R., Ghosh, R., Bloom, J. S., Félix, M.-A., & Kruglyak, L. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.1050 · Cited by 403
Self-citationCeNDR, the Caenorhabditis elegans natural diversity resource
Cook, D. E., Zdraljevic, S., Roberts, J. P., & Andersen, E. C. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw893 · Cited by 304
Widespread Genetic Incompatibility in C. Elegans Maintained by Balancing Selection
Seidel, H. S., Rockman, M. V., & Kruglyak, L. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151107 · Cited by 280
Ecology of Caenorhabditis species
Kiontke, K. (2006) · WormBook · doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.37.1 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrière, A., & Félix, M.-A.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1176-1184
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065465505
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Local Genetic Diversity and Low Outcrossing Rate in Caenorhabditis elegans Natural Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.022
- The paper
- Barrière, A., & Félix, M.-A. (2005). High Local Genetic Diversity and Low Outcrossing Rate in Caenorhabditis elegans Natural Populations. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.