The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic Signatures of Coancestry within Surnames
Abstract
Surnames are cultural markers of shared ancestry within human populations. The Y chromosome, like many surnames, is paternally inherited, so men sharing surnames might be expected to share similar Y chromosomes as a signature of coancestry. Such a relationship could be used to connect branches of family trees, to validate population genetic studies based on isonymy, and to predict surname from crime-scene samples in forensics. However, the link may be weak or absent due to multiple independent founders for many names, adoptions, name changes and nonpaternities, and mutation of Y haplotypes. Here, rather than focusing on a single name, we take a general approach by seeking evidence for a link in a sample of 150 randomly ascertained pairs of males who each share a British surname. We show that sharing a surname significantly elevates the probability of sharing a Y-chromosomal haplotype and that this probability increases as surname frequency decreases. Within our sample, we estimate that up to 24% of pairs share recent ancestry and that a large surname-based forensic database might contribute to the intelligence-led investigation of up to approximately 70 rapes and murders per year in the UK. This approach would be applicable to any society that uses patrilineal surnames of reasonable time-depth.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is not the case for the English, who demonstrate much weaker signals of coancestry between Y-chromosomes and surnames, especially when the surname is very common70,71.”
From Cultural hitchhiking and competition between patrilineal kin groups explain the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2018) · cites this paper as [70]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Jobling, 2001, In the name of the father: surnames and genetics, Trends Genet., 17, 353, 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02284-3 · DOI
- Jobling, 1997, The Y chromosome in forensic analysis and paternity testing, Int. J. Legal Med., 110, 118, 10.1007/s004140050050 · DOI
- Sykes, 2000, Surnames and the Y chromosome, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 66, 1417, 10.1086/302850 · DOI
- Underhill, 2000, Y chromosome sequence variation and the history of human populations, Nat. Genet., 26, 358, 10.1038/81685 · DOI · Paper page
- Jobling, 2003, The human Y chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age, Nat. Rev. Genet., 4, 598, 10.1038/nrg1124 · DOI
- Hammer, 2002, The human Y chromosome haplogroup tree: nomenclature and phylogeny of its major divisions, Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 31, 303, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085413 · DOI
- Walsh, 2001, Estimating the time to the most recent common ancestor for the Y chromosome or mitochondrial DNA for a pair of individuals, Genetics, 158, 897, 10.1093/genetics/158.2.897 · DOI
- Y Chromosome Consortium, 2002, A nomenclature system for the tree of human Y-chromosomal binary haplogroups, Genome Res., 12, 339, 10.1101/gr.217602 · DOI · Paper page
- Bosch, 2006, Male and female lineages in the Balkans show a homogeneous landscape over linguistic barriers, except for the isolated Aromuns, Ann. Hum. Genet., 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2005.00251.x · DOI
- Adams, 2006, The case of the unreliable SNP: recurrent back-mutation of Y-chromosomal marker P25 through gene conversion, Forensic Sci. Int., 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.06.003 · DOI
- Bosch, 2002, High resolution Y chromosome typing: 19 STRs amplified in three multiplex reactions, Forensic Sci. Int., 125, 42, 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00627-2 · DOI
- Heyer, 1997, Estimating Y chromosome specific microsatellite mutation frequencies using deep rooting pedigrees, Hum. Mol. Genet., 6, 799, 10.1093/hmg/6.5.799 · DOI
- Gusmão, 2005, Mutation rates at Y chromosome specific microsatellites, Hum. Mutat., 26, 520, 10.1002/humu.20254 · DOI
Cited by
Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference
Gymrek, M., McGuire, A. L., Golan, D., Halperin, E., & Erlich, Y. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1229566 · Cited by 1,228
Zeng, T. C., Aw, A. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04375-6 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- King, T. E., Ballereau, S. J., Schürer, K. E., & Jobling, M. A.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 384-388
- ISSN
- 0960-9822
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 2723 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review