The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Task-Dependent Changes of Bimanual Feedback Control and Adaptation
Open accessAbstract
The control and adaptation of bimanual movements is often considered to be a function of a fixed set of mechanisms [1, 2]. Here, I show that both feedback control and adaptation change optimally with task goals. Participants reached with two hands to two separate spatial targets (two-cursor condition) or used the same bimanual movements to move a cursor presented at the spatial average location of the two hands to a single target (one-cursor condition). A force field was randomly applied to one of the hands. In the two-cursor condition, online corrections occurred only on the perturbed hand, whereas the other movement was controlled independently. In the one-cursor condition, online correction could be detected on both hands as early as 190 ms after the start. These changes can be shown to be optimal in respect to a simple task-dependent cost function [3]. Adaptation, the influence of a perturbation onto the next movement, also depended on task goals. In the two-cursor condition, only the perturbed hand adapted to a force perturbation [2], whereas in the one-cursor condition, both hands adapted. These findings demonstrate that the central nervous system changes bimanual feedback control and adaptation optimally according to the current task requirements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination
Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn963 · Cited by 3,081
Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements
Thoroughman, K. A., & Shadmehr, R. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-19-08573.1999 · Cited by 467
Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control
Liu, D., & Todorov, E. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1110-06.2007 · Cited by 447
Cited by
Faisal, A. A., Selen, L. P. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2258 · Cited by 2,883
Principles of sensorimotor learning
Wolpert, D. M., Diedrichsen, J., & Flanagan, J. R. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3112 · Cited by 1,391
Self-citationA computational neuroanatomy for motor control
Shadmehr, R., & Krakauer, J. W. (2008) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5 · Cited by 1,187
Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond
Krakauer, J. W., & Mazzoni, P. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.06.012 · Cited by 558
The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond
Diedrichsen, J., Shadmehr, R., & Ivry, R. B. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.11.004 · Cited by 577
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Diedrichsen, J.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1675-1679
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093676966
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Task-Dependent Changes of Bimanual Feedback Control and Adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.051
- The paper
- Diedrichsen, J. (2007). Optimal Task-Dependent Changes of Bimanual Feedback Control and Adaptation. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.