Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements
Open accessAbstract
Theoretical and psychophysical studies have suggested that humans learn to make reaching movements in novel dynamic environments by building specific internal models (IMs). Here we have found electromyographic correlates of internal model formation. We recorded EMG from four muscles as subjects learned to move a manipulandum that created systematic forces (a “force field”). We also simulated a biomechanical controller, which generated movements based on an adaptive IM of the inverse dynamics of the human arm and the manipulandum. The simulation defined two metrics of muscle activation. The first metric measured the component of the EMG of each muscle that counteracted the force field. We found that early in training, the field-appropriate EMG was driven by an error feedback signal. As subjects practiced, the peak of the field-appropriate EMG shifted temporally to earlier in the movement, becoming a feedforward command. The gradual temporal shift suggests that the CNS may use the delayed error–feedback response, which was likely to have been generated through spinal reflex circuits, as a template to learn a predictive feedforward response. The second metric quantified formation of the IM through changes in the directional bias of each muscle’s spatial EMG function, i.e., EMG as a function of movement direction. As subjects practiced, co-activation decreased, and the directional bias of each muscle’s EMG function gradually rotated by an amount that was specific to the field being learned. This demonstrates that formation of an IM can be represented through rotations in the spatial tuning of muscle EMG functions. Combined with other recent work linking spatial tunings of EMG and motor cortical cells, these results suggest that rotations in motor cortical tuning functions could underlie representation of internal models in the CNS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The brain learns to anticipate the consequences of motor commands.
“Adaptation to perturbations, such as force fields or visuomotor transformations, provides compelling evidence that the brain learns to anticipate the consequences of motor commands (Shadmehr and Mussa-Ivaldi, 1994; Thoroughman and Shadmehr, 1999).”
From Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors (2019) · cites this paper as Thoroughman and Shadmehr, 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Error Correction, Sensory Prediction, and Adaptation in Motor Control
Shadmehr, R., Smith, M. A., & Krakauer, J. W. (2010) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153135 · Cited by 1,869 · see citing works
Self-citationInteracting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning
Smith, M. A., Ghazizadeh, A., & Shadmehr, R. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040179 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives
Thoroughman, K. A., & Shadmehr, R. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35037588 · Cited by 945 · see citing works
Self-citationSensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching
Tseng, Y.-W., Diedrichsen, J., Krakauer, J. W., Shadmehr, R., & Bastian, A. J. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00266.2007 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Self-citationComputation Through Neural Population Dynamics
Vyas, S., Golub, M. D., Sussillo, D., & Shenoy, K. V. (2020) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-092619-094115 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Krakauer, J. W., & Shadmehr, R. (2006) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2005.10.003 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Self-citationRunning economy: Measurement, norms, and determining factors
Barnes, K. R., & Kilding, A. E. (2015) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-015-0007-y · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Learning to move amid uncertainty
Scheidt, R. A., Dingwell, J. B., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (2001) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.971 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors
Diedrichsen, J., White, O., Newman, D., & Lally, N. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5406-09.2010 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Maschke, M., Gomez, C. M., Ebner, T. J., & Konczak, J. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00557.2003 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors
Popa, L. S., & Ebner, T. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2018.00524 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
The planning and control of reaching movements
Sabes, P. (2000) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00149-5 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Force field effects on cerebellar Purkinje cell discharge with implications for internal models
Pasalar, S., Roitman, A. V., Durfee, W. K., & Ebner, T. J. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1783 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Motor cortical activity changes during neuroprosthetic-controlled object interaction
Downey, J. E., Brane, L., Gaunt, R. A., Tyler-Kabara, E. C., Boninger, M. L., & Collinger, J. L. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17222-3 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Jacquet, T., Lepers, R., Poulin-Charronnat, B., Bard, P., Pfister, P., & Pageaux, B. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107701 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Remembering forward: Neural correlates of memory and prediction in human motor adaptation
Scheidt, R. A., Zimbelman, J. L., Salowitz, N. M. G., Suminski, A. J., Mosier, K. M., Houk, J., & Simo, L. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.072 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Human Adaptation to Interaction Forces in Visuo-Motor Coordination
Huang, F. C., Gillespie, R. B., & Kuo, A. D. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2006.881533 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thoroughman, K. A., & Shadmehr, R.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- ORCID
- Shadmehr, Reza
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 8573-8588
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6783008
- OpenAlex
- W2131991519
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9256763)
- Vlaamse regering
- National Institutes of Health (NS37422)
- National Institute on Aging (T32AG052375)
- Office of Naval Research
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS037422, 1-RO1-NS37422)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- internal models, reaching movements, force fields, motor learning, muscle activation, error feedback, feedforward control, CO activation, biomechanical simulation, spinal reflexes
- MeSH terms
- Arm, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Models, Biological, Motor Activity, Movement, Muscle Contraction, Psychomotor Performance, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review