Cited by 467Motor Control and AdaptationMuscle activation and electromyography studiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements

Open access
Thoroughman, Kurt A., Shadmehr, Reza·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Theoretical and psychophysical studies have suggested that humans learn to make reaching movements in novel dynamic environments by building specific internal models (IMs). Here we have found electromyographic correlates of internal model formation. We recorded EMG from four muscles as subjects learned to move a manipulandum that created systematic forces (a “force field”). We also simulated a biomechanical controller, which generated movements based on an adaptive IM of the inverse dynamics of the human arm and the manipulandum. The simulation defined two metrics of muscle activation. The first metric measured the component of the EMG of each muscle that counteracted the force field. We found that early in training, the field-appropriate EMG was driven by an error feedback signal. As subjects practiced, the peak of the field-appropriate EMG shifted temporally to earlier in the movement, becoming a feedforward command. The gradual temporal shift suggests that the CNS may use the delayed error–feedback response, which was likely to have been generated through spinal reflex circuits, as a template to learn a predictive feedforward response. The second metric quantified formation of the IM through changes in the directional bias of each muscle’s spatial EMG function, i.e., EMG as a function of movement direction. As subjects practiced, co-activation decreased, and the directional bias of each muscle’s EMG function gradually rotated by an amount that was specific to the field being learned. This demonstrates that formation of an IM can be represented through rotations in the spatial tuning of muscle EMG functions. Combined with other recent work linking spatial tunings of EMG and motor cortical cells, these results suggest that rotations in motor cortical tuning functions could underlie representation of internal models in the CNS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-19-08573.1999

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brain learns to anticipate the consequences of motor commands.

    “Adaptation to perturbations, such as force fields or visuomotor transformations, provides compelling evidence that the brain learns to anticipate the consequences of motor commands (Shadmehr and Mussa-Ivaldi, 1994; Thoroughman and Shadmehr, 1999).”

    From Cerebellum, Predictions and Errors (2019) · cites this paper as Thoroughman and Shadmehr, 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thoroughman, K. A., & Shadmehr, R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-10-01
Volume
19
Issue
19
Pages
8573-8588
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2131991519
Cited by
467
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9256763)
  • Vlaamse regering
  • National Institutes of Health (NS37422)
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG052375)
  • Office of Naval Research
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS037422, 1-RO1-NS37422)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
internal models, reaching movements, force fields, motor learning, muscle activation, error feedback, feedforward control, CO activation, biomechanical simulation, spinal reflexes
MeSH terms
Arm, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Models, Biological, Motor Activity, Movement, Muscle Contraction, Psychomotor Performance, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review