Cited by 23Cognitive Computing and NetworksCybernetics and Technology in SocietyCognitive Abilities and Testing

How does the speed of thought compare for brains and digital computers?

Open access
Nagarajan, Naveen, Stevens, Charles F.·2008·Current Biology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.043

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This computational model may be questionable, however, as computers are based on von Neumann architecture, whereas brain circuits are not; and brains operate in a massively parallel manner, whereas computers do not.

    “This computational model may be questionable, however, as computers are based on von Neumann architecture, whereas brain circuits are not; and brains operate in a massively parallel manner, whereas computers do not”

    From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Nagarajan and Stevens, 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagarajan, N., & Stevens, C. F.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Stevens, Charles F.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
18
Issue
17
Pages
R756-R758
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982928177
Cited by
23
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
human brain, digital computers, artificial intelligence, machine intelligence, human-computer comparison, task automation
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Computers, Humans, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review