Cited by 51Evolution and Genetic DynamicsAnimal Behavior and ReproductionMorphological variations and asymmetry

Cryptic genetic variation

Open access
Gibson, Greg, Reed, Laura K.·2008·Current Biology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.011

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some enhancer variants that appear functionally neutral when tested under normal steady-state conditions may show cryptic effects under stress or upon stimulus response.

    “Notably, some enhancer variants that appear functionally neutral when tested under normal steady-state conditions may show “cryptic” effects under stress or upon stimulus response [107, 226, 227].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [226]

    In “How is cryptic genetic variation related to canalization?” (page unavailable), the paper says genetic effects can be suppressed under normal conditions and become visible when the environment changes. It does not specifically discuss enhancer variants, steady-state enhancer tests, or stimulus responses, so those details are not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibson, G., & Reed, L. K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gibson, Greg
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
18
Issue
21
Pages
R989-R990
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172258218
Cited by
49
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F32GM082021)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
cryptic genetic variation, gene expression, genetic background, environmental stress
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Phenotype, Genetic Variation, Inheritance Patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review