Cited by 348Evolution and Genetic DynamicsPhilosophy and History of ScienceGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Robustness: mechanisms and consequences

Open access
Masel, Joanna, Siegal, Mark L.·2009·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

Biological systems are robust to perturbation by mutations and environmental fluctuations. New data are shedding light on the biochemical and network-level mechanisms responsible for robustness. Robustness to mutation might have evolved as an adaptation to reduce the effect of mutations, as a congruent byproduct of adaptive robustness to environmental variation, or as an intrinsic property of biological systems selected for their primary functions. Whatever its mechanism or origin, robustness to mutation results in the accumulation of phenotypically cryptic genetic variation. Partial robustness can lead to pre-adaptation, and thereby might contribute to evolvability. The identification and characterization of phenotypic capacitors - which act as switches of the degree of robustness - are critical to understanding the mechanisms and consequences of robustness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2009.07.005

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Natural selection on developmental programmes in humans has led to robustness in a range of genetic or environmental perturbations, so typical development occurs along a track.

    “We frame this issue using the concept of developmental canalization88, whereby natural selection on developmental programmes in humans has led to robustness in a range of genetic or environmental perturbations89,90: typical development occurs along a ‘track’ (FIG. 1c).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masel, J., & Siegal, M. L.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Siegal, Mark L.
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
395-403
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069614478
Cited by
348
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 26
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM076041)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
biological robustness, environmental variability, preadaptation, evolvability, biochemical reaction networks
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Animals, Mutation, Genetic Variation, Gene Expression, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review