Cited by 205Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Poor haptic orientation discrimination in nonsighted children may reflect disruption of cross-sensory calibration

Open access
Gori, Monica, Sandini, Giulio, Martinoli, Cristina, Burr, David·2010·Current Biology

Abstract

A long-standing question, going back at least 300 years to Berkeley's famous essay, is how sensory systems become calibrated with physical reality. We recently showed [1] that children younger than 8-10 years do not integrate visual and haptic information optimally, but that one or the other sense prevails: touch for size and vision for orientation discrimination. The sensory dominance may reflect crossmodal calibration of vision and touch, where the more accurate sense calibrates the other. This hypothesis leads to a clear prediction: that lack of clear vision at an early age should affect calibration of haptic orientation discrimination. We therefore measured size and orientation haptic discrimination thresholds in 17 congenitally visually impaired children (aged 5-19). Haptic orientation thresholds were greatly impaired compared with age-matched controls, whereas haptic size thresholds were at least as good, and often better. One child with a late-acquired visual impairment stood out with excellent orientation discrimination. The results provide strong support for our crossmodal calibration hypothesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.069

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visual experience is important for the development of a representation of the environment even for another sense, consistent with crossmodal calibration.

    “What this may mean is that visual experience is important for the development of a representation of the environment even for another sense, consistent with the idea of crossmodal calibration (Gori et al., 2010; Occelli et al., 2013).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Gori et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gori, M., Sandini, G., Martinoli, C., & Burr, D.
Affiliations
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • Neuroscience Institute (IT)
Corresponding author
Gori, Monica
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
223-225
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145236435
Cited by
205
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (other-oa)
Funders
European Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
congenital visual impairment, multisensory integration, sensory dominance, haptic perception, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Blindness, Child, Child, Preschool, Discrimination, Psychological, Humans, Orientation, Perception, Psychometrics, Touch, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review