Cited by 508Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation

Zangaladze, Andro, Epstein, Charles M., Grafton, Scott T., Sathian, K.·1999·Nature

Abstract

The primary sense modalities (vision, touch and so on) are generally thought of as distinct. However, visual imagery is implicated in the normal tactile perception of some object properties, such as orientation, shape and size. Furthermore, certain tactile tasks, such as discrimination of grating orientation and object recognition, are associated with activity in areas of visual cortex. Here we show that disrupting function of the occipital cortex using focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interferes with the tactile discrimination of grating orientation. The specificity of this effect is illustrated by its time course and spatial restriction over the scalp, and by the failure of occipital TMS to affect either detection of an electrical stimulus applied to the fingerpad or tactile discrimination of grating texture. In contrast, TMS over the somatosensory cortex blocked discrimination of grating texture as well as orientation. We also report that, during tactile discrimination of grating orientation, an evoked potential is recorded over posterior scalp regions with a latency corresponding to the peak of the TMS interference effect (about 180 ms). The findings indicate that visual cortex is closely involved in tactile discrimination of orientation. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that visual cortical processing is necessary for normal tactile perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/44139

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TMS to regions typically considered primarily visual disrupted tactile discrimination.

    “Zangaladze et al. (1999) found that TMS to regions typically considered primarily visual disrupted tactile discrimination.”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Zangaladze et al. (1999)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zangaladze, A., Epstein, C. M., Grafton, S. T., & Sathian, K.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Sathian, K.
Venue
Nature
Published
1999-10
Volume
401
Issue
6753
Pages
587-590
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2040996971
Cited by
508
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual cortex, cross-modal interaction, grating orientation, somatosensory cortex, transcranial magnetic stimulation, occipital cortex, tactile perception, evoked potentials, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Evoked Potentials, Humans, Magnetics, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review