The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solutions to the Public Goods Dilemma in Bacterial Biofilms
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Bacteria frequently live in densely populated surface-bound communities, termed biofilms [1-4]. Biofilm-dwelling cells rely on secretion of extracellular substances to construct their communities and to capture nutrients from the environment [5]. Some secreted factors behave as cooperative public goods: they can be exploited by non-producing cells [6-11]. The means by which public-good-producing bacteria avert exploitation in biofilm environments are largely unknown. Using experiments with Vibrio cholerae, which secretes extracellular enzymes to digest its primary food source, the solid polymer chitin, we show that the public goods dilemma may be solved by two very different mechanisms: cells can produce thick biofilms that confine the goods to producers, or fluid flow can remove soluble products of chitin digestion, denying access to non-producers. Both processes are unified by limiting the distance over which enzyme-secreting cells provide benefits to neighbors, resulting in preferential benefit to nearby clonemates and allowing kin selection to favor public good production. Our results demonstrate new mechanisms by which the physical conditions of natural habitats can interact with bacterial physiology to promote the evolution of cooperation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria
Griffin, A. S., West, S. A., & Buckling, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02744 · Cited by 1,104
Cited by
Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria
Papenfort, K., & Bassler, B. L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89 · Cited by 2,256
Self-citationBacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments
Mukherjee, S., & Bassler, B. L. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0186-5 · Cited by 1,374
Self-citationExplosive cell lysis as a mechanism for the biogenesis of bacterial membrane vesicles and biofilms
Turnbull, L., Toyofuku, M., Hynen, A. L., Kurosawa, M., Pessi, G., Petty, N. K., Osvath, S. R., Cárcamo-Oyarce, G., Gloag, E. S., Shimoni, R., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11220 · Cited by 709
The evolution of cooperation within the gut microbiota
Rakoff-Nahoum, S., Foster, K. R., & Comstock, L. E. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17626 · Cited by 616
The Mechanical World of Bacteria
Persat, A., Nadell, C. D., Kim, M. K., Ingremeau, F., Siryaporn, A., Drescher, K., Wingreen, N. S., Bassler, B. L., Gitai, Z., & Stone, H. A. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.005 · Cited by 615
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Drescher, K., Nadell, C. D., Stone, H. A., Wingreen, N. S., & Bassler, B. L.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-55
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148097728
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solutions to the Public Goods Dilemma in Bacterial Biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.030
- The paper
- Drescher, K., Nadell, C. D., Stone, H. A., Wingreen, N. S., & Bassler, B. L. (2014). Solutions to the Public Goods Dilemma in Bacterial Biofilms. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.