The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments
Open accessAbstract
Quorum sensing is a process of bacterial cell-to-cell chemical communication that relies on the production, detection and response to extracellular signalling molecules called autoinducers. Quorum sensing allows groups of bacteria to synchronously alter behaviour in response to changes in the population density and species composition of the vicinal community. Quorum-sensing-mediated communication is now understood to be the norm in the bacterial world. Elegant research has defined quorum-sensing components and their interactions, for the most part, under ideal and highly controlled conditions. Indeed, these seminal studies laid the foundations for the field. In this Review, we highlight new findings concerning how bacteria deploy quorum sensing in realistic scenarios that mimic nature. We focus on how quorums are detected and how quorum sensing controls group behaviours in complex and dynamically changing environments such as multi-species bacterial communities, in the presence of flow, in 3D non-uniform biofilms and in hosts during infection. Most bacteria live in fluctuating environments that can have complex topographies and multiple species present. In this Review, Mukherjee and Bassler discuss how factors such as flow, geometry, biofilms and the presence of the host microbiota influence bacterial quorum sensing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Flemming, H.-C., & Wingender, J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2415 · Cited by 10,137
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the Body
Sender, R., Fuchs, S., & Milo, R. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533 · Cited by 5,425
Miller, M. B., & Bassler, B. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.165 · Cited by 5,105
Self-citationQUORUM SENSING: Cell-to-Cell Communication in Bacteria
Waters, C. M., & Bassler, B. L. (2005) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001 · Cited by 3,979
Self-citationEvolution of mammals and their gut microbes
Ley, R. E., Hamady, M., Lozupone, C., Turnbaugh, P. J., Ramey, R. R., Bircher, J. S., Schlegel, M. L., Tucker, T. A., Schrenzel, M. D., Knight, R., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155725 · Cited by 3,747
The gut microbiota--masters of host development and physiology
Sommer, F., & Bäckhed, F. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2974 · Cited by 3,681
The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease
Cho, I., & Blaser, M. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3182 · Cited by 3,449
Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences
McFall-Ngai, M., Hadfield, M. G., Bosch, T. C. G., Carey, H. V., Domazet-Lošo, T., Douglas, A. E., Dubilier, N., Eberl, G., Fukami, T., Gilbert, S. F., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218525110 · Cited by 2,782
Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & Franklin, M. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1838 · Cited by 2,327
Cited by
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms
Thi, M. T. T., Wibowo, D., & Rehm, B. H. A. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21228671 · Cited by 911
Plant Growth Stimulation by Microbial Consortia
Santoyo, G., Guzmán-Guzmán, P., Parra-Cota, F. I., Santos-Villalobos, S. D. L., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., & Glick, B. R. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11020219 · Cited by 363
The ecological roles of bacterial chemotaxis
Keegstra, J. M., Carrara, F., & Stocker, R. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00709-w · Cited by 312
Microbial colonization and degradation of marine microplastics in the plastisphere: A review
Zhai, X., Zhang, X.-H., & Yu, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1127308 · Cited by 281
Microbial interactions within beneficial consortia promote soil health
Wu, D., Wang, W., Yao, Y., Li, H., Wang, Q., & Niu, B. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165801 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Mukherjee, S., & Bassler, B. L.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Microbiology
- Published
- 2019-04-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 371-382
- ISSN
- 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-1534
- OpenAlex
- W2931314706
- Cited by
- 1,374
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41579-019-0186-5
- The paper
- Mukherjee, S., & Bassler, B. L. (2019). Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nature Reviews Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0186-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
