The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural Representations of Emotion Are Organized around Abstract Event Features
Open accessAbstract
Summary Research on emotion attribution has tended to focus on the perception of overt expressions of at most five or six basic emotions. However, our ability to identify others' emotional states is not limited to perception of these canonical expressions. Instead, we make fine-grained inferences about what others feel based on the situations they encounter, relying on knowledge of the eliciting conditions for different emotions. In the present research, we provide convergent behavioral and neural evidence concerning the representations underlying these concepts. First, we find that patterns of activity in mentalizing regions contain information about subtle emotional distinctions conveyed through verbal descriptions of eliciting situations. Second, we identify a space of abstract situation features that well captures the emotion discriminations subjects make behaviorally and show that this feature space outperforms competing models in capturing the similarity space of neural patterns in these regions. Together, the data suggest that our knowledge of others' emotions is abstract and high dimensional, that brain regions selective for mental state reasoning support relatively subtle distinctions between emotion concepts, and that the neural representations in these regions are not reducible to more primitive affective dimensions such as valence and arousal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334 · cited 2×
“A second theory is the ‘‘circumplex’’ model, which posits that emotions are composed of only two primitive dimensions—valence and arousal [9, 22, 23]—corresponding to two innate systems implemented in distinct neural circuits and recruited to varying degrees across different emotions [24–26].”
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
POSNER, J., RUSSELL, J. A., & PETERSON, B. S. (2005) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579405050340 · Cited by 2,602 · cited 1×
“Although many have focused on the differences between these two proposals [28, 29], both aim to represent emotions in terms of combinations of a small number of basic affective states, rooted in innate neural substrates.”
People thinking about thinking peopleThe role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”
Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00230-1 · Cited by 2,316 · cited 1×
“We also tested other regions of the ToM network [16]: precuneus (PC), bilateral temporal parietal junction (TPJ), and right STS (RSTS).”
Self-citationPerformance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex
Yamins, D. L. K., Hong, H., Cadieu, C. F., Solomon, E. A., Seibert, D., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1403112111 · Cited by 1,924
Barrett, L. F. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x · Cited by 1,859
How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192788 · Cited by 1,815
Deep supervised, but not unsupervised, models may explain IT cortical representation
Khaligh-Razavi, S.-M., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003915 · Cited by 1,204
Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns
Mitchell, T. M., Shinkareva, S. V., Carlson, A., Chang, K.-M., Malave, V. L., Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152876 · Cited by 1,180
Chapter 4 Affect as a Psychological Primitive
Barrett, L. F., & Bliss‐Moreau, E. (2009) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00404-8 · Cited by 621
Cited by
The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization
Barrett, L. F. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsw154 · Cited by 1,426
“…2015) Multimodal summaries of emotion concepts are represented in the default mode network Human neuroimaging: task-related data (Peelen et al., 2010; Skerry and Saxe, 2015) Default mode and salience network interconnectivity is associated with the intensity of emotional experiences (as distinct…”
The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization
Barrett, L. F. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx060 · Cited by 1,009
“…2015) Multimodal summaries of emotion concepts are represented in the default mode network Human neuroimaging: task-related data (Peelen et al., 2010; Skerry and Saxe, 2015) Default mode and salience network interconnectivity is associated with the intensity of emotional experiences (as distinct…”
Towards Empathetic Open-domain Conversation Models: A New Benchmark and Dataset
Rashkin, H., Smith, E. M., Li, M., & Boureau, Y.-L. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1534 · Cited by 771
Evidence for a large-scale brain system supporting allostasis and interoception in humans
Kleckner, I. R., Zhang, J., Touroutoglou, A., Chanes, L., Xia, C., Simmons, W. K., Quigley, K. S., Dickerson, B. C., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0069 · Cited by 641
An active inference theory of allostasis and interoception in depression
Barrett, L. F., Quigley, K. S., & Hamilton, P. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0011 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Skerry, A. E., & Saxe, R.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1945-1954
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1893417051
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Representations of Emotion Are Organized around Abstract Event Features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.009
- The paper
- Skerry, A. E., & Saxe, R. (2015). Neural Representations of Emotion Are Organized around Abstract Event Features. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
