The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consistent Individual Differences Drive Collective Behavior and Group Functioning of Schooling Fish
Open accessAbstract
The ubiquity of consistent inter-individual differences in behavior ("animal personalities") [1, 2] suggests that they might play a fundamental role in driving the movements and functioning of animal groups [3, 4], including their collective decision-making, foraging performance, and predator avoidance. Despite increasing evidence that highlights their importance [5-16], we still lack a unified mechanistic framework to explain and to predict how consistent inter-individual differences may drive collective behavior. Here we investigate how the structure, leadership, movement dynamics, and foraging performance of groups can emerge from inter-individual differences by high-resolution tracking of known behavioral types in free-swimming stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) shoals. We show that individual's propensity to stay near others, measured by a classic "sociability" assay, was negatively linked to swim speed across a range of contexts, and predicted spatial positioning and leadership within groups as well as differences in structure and movement dynamics between groups. In turn, this trait, together with individual's exploratory tendency, measured by a classic "boldness" assay, explained individual and group foraging performance. These effects of consistent individual differences on group-level states emerged naturally from a generic model of self-organizing groups composed of individuals differing in speed and goal-orientedness. Our study provides experimental and theoretical evidence for a simple mechanism to explain the emergence of collective behavior from consistent individual differences, including variation in the structure, leadership, movement dynamics, and functional capabilities of groups, across social and ecological scales. In addition, we demonstrate individual performance is conditional on group composition, indicating how social selection may drive behavioral differentiation between individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Individual and Group Performance Suffers from Social Niche Disruption
Laskowski, K. L., Montiglio, P., & Pruitt, J. N. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/686220 · Cited by 28
RetractedCrawley, M. J. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,431
Krause, J., & Ruxton, G. D. (2002) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198508175.001.0001 · Cited by 3,189
Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution
Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2007) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00010.x · Cited by 3,132
Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03236 · Cited by 2,753
Self-citationRepeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists.
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00141.x · Cited by 2,584
Collective Memory and Spatial Sorting in Animal Groups
COUZIN, I. D., KRAUSE, J., JAMES, R., RUXTON, G. D., & FRANKS, N. R. (2002) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2002.3065 · Cited by 2,138
Self-citationThe repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis
Bell, A. M., Hankison, S. J., & Laskowski, K. L. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.022 · Cited by 2,128
Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis
Smith, B. R., & Blumstein, D. T. (2008) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arm144 · Cited by 1,450
Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks
Nagy, M., Ákos, Z., Biro, D., & Vicsek, T. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08891 · Cited by 1,053
Cited by
DeepPoseKit, a software toolkit for fast and robust animal pose estimation using deep learning
Graving, J. M., Chae, D., Naik, H., Li, L., Koger, B., Costelloe, B. R., & Couzin, I. D. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47994 · Cited by 547
Self-citationMcKee, A., Soto, A. P., Chen, P., & McHenry, M. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.0568 · Cited by 42
Friesen, C. N., Maclaine, K. D., & Hofmann, H. A. (2022) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105241 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Jolles, J. W., Boogert, N. J., Sridhar, V. H., Couzin, I. D., & Manica, A.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2862-2868.e7
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2611714591
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 28.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consistent Individual Differences Drive Collective Behavior and Group Functioning of Schooling Fish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.004
- The paper
- Jolles, J. W., Boogert, N. J., Sridhar, V. H., Couzin, I. D., & Manica, A. (2017). Consistent Individual Differences Drive Collective Behavior and Group Functioning of Schooling Fish. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.