Cited by 69Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyGene Regulatory Network AnalysisTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology

A Parallel Adder Coordinates Mycobacterial Cell-Cycle Progression and Cell-Size Homeostasis in the Context of Asymmetric Growth and Organization

Open access
Logsdon, Michelle M., Ho, Po-Yi, Papavinasasundaram, Kadamba, Richardson, Kirill, Cokol, Murat, Sassetti, Christopher M., Amir, Ariel, Aldridge, Bree B.·2017·Current Biology

Abstract

In model bacteria, such as E. coli and B. subtilis, regulation of cell-cycle progression and cellular organization achieves consistency in cell size, replication dynamics, and chromosome positioning [1-3]. Mycobacteria elongate and divide asymmetrically, giving rise to significant variation in cell size and elongation rate among closely related cells [4, 5]. Given the physical asymmetry of mycobacteria, the models that describe coordination of cellular organization and cell-cycle progression in model bacteria are not directly translatable [1, 2, 6-8]. Here, we used time-lapse microscopy and fluorescent reporters of DNA replication and chromosome positioning to examine the coordination of growth, division, and chromosome dynamics at a single-cell level in Mycobacterium smegmatis (M. smegmatis) and Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). By analyzing chromosome and replisome localization, we demonstrated that chromosome positioning is asymmetric and proportional to cell size. Furthermore, we found that cellular asymmetry is maintained throughout the cell cycle and is not established at division. Using measurements and stochastic modeling of mycobacterial cell size and cell-cycle timing in both slow and fast growth conditions, we found that well-studied models of cell-size control are insufficient to explain the mycobacterial cell cycle. Instead, we showed that mycobacterial cell-cycle progression is regulated by an unprecedented mechanism involving parallel adders (i.e., constant growth increments) that start at replication initiation. Together, these adders enable mycobacterial populations to regulate cell size, growth, and heterogeneity in the face of varying environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.046

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mycobacteria divide asymmetrically by a fast, mechanical-snapping mechanism.

    “Mycobacteria divide asymmetrically by a fast, mechanical-snapping mechanism (107, 118–121).”

    From Mycobacterium smegmatis: The Vanguard of Mycobacterial Research (2023) · cites this paper as [120]

    The Abstract and Results and Discussion describe asymmetric mycobacterial division. STAR Methods identifies snapping or pinching as observable division events, but does not establish that division is fast or explain snapping as a mechanical mechanism. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Richardson K Bennion OT Tan S Hoang AN Cokol M Aldridge BB 2016 Temporal and intrinsic factors of rifampicin tolerance in mycobacteria Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 8302 8307 27357669 PMC4961206

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Logsdon, M. M., Ho, P.-Y., Papavinasasundaram, K., Richardson, K., Cokol, M., Sassetti, C. M., Amir, A., & Aldridge, B. B.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Aldridge, Bree B.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
27
Issue
21
Pages
3367-3374.e7
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766834052
Cited by
69
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • NIH (1DP2LM011952-01, P50 GM107618-01A1, AI064282, 5T32AI007422-24)
  • Harvard Dean’s Competitive Fund for Promising Scholarship
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Keywords
parallel adder, cell size homeostasis, cell cycle progression, asymmetric cell division, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium bovis BCG, chromosome positioning, replisome, DNA replication, cell growth, stochastic modeling, cell size control, single-cell dynamics
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Replication, Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Cell Size, Time-Lapse Imaging, Asymmetric Cell Division

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review