Cited by 36Language Development and DisordersPhonetics and Phonology ResearchAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Infant boys are more vocal than infant girls

Open access
Oller, D. Kimbrough, Griebel, Ulrike, Bowman, Dale D., Bene, Edina, Long, Helen L., Yoo, Hyunjoo, Ramsay, Gordon·2020·Current Biology

Abstract

Although it is generally assumed females have a language advantage over males, Oller et al., studying all-day recordings of 100 infants, found that boys in the first year of life produced more speech-like vocalizations than girls and that the effect size was more than four times larger than the commonly reported female language advantage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.049

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the general population, male children produce more protophones than female children in the first year of life.

    “In the general population, recent research unexpectedly revealed that male children produce more ‘protophones’ (that is, speech-like vocalizations) than female children in the first year of life140.”

    From Sex and gender in neurodevelopmental conditions (2023) · cites this paper as [140]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oller, D. K., Griebel, U., Bowman, D. D., Bene, E., Long, H. L., Yoo, H., & Ramsay, G.
Affiliations
  • Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research (AT)
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Oller, D. Kimbrough
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
R426-R427
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024177391
Cited by
36
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
infant vocalizations, sex differences, infant language development, autism risk, infant crying, first year of life, origin of language, sex differences in language
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Male, Sex Factors, Speech Production Measurement, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review