The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The optimal design of the retaining walls built by the Incas in their agricultural terraces
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to later Inka terrace agriculture in the Andean region, the terrace-settlement system at Cutamalla was less standardized in terms of architecture, layout, and distribution, which seems logical due to the different political, economic, and socio-cultural context.
“Compared to later Inka terrace agriculture in the Andean region (Kendall and Rodríguez, 2009; Castro et al., 2019; Ortloff, 2019), we want to emphasize that the terrace-settlement system at Cutamalla was less standardized in terms of architecture, layout, and distribution, which seems logical due to the different political, economic, and socio-cultural context.”
From An integrative approach to ancient agricultural terraces and forms of dependency: the case of cutamalla in the prehispanic andes (2024) · cites this paper as Castro et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Protzen, 1985, Inca quarrying and stonecutting, J. Soc. Archit. Hist., 44, 161, 10.2307/990027 · DOI
- Wright, 1997, Machu Picchu ancient agricultural potential, Appl. Eng. Agric., 13, 39, 10.13031/2013.21587 · DOI
- Chepstow-Lusty, 2009, Putting the rise of the Inca empire within a climatic and land management context, Clim. Past, 5, 375, 10.5194/cp-5-375-2009 · DOI
- Wright, 1999, Ancient Machu Picchu drainage engineering, J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 125, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1999)125:6(360) · DOI
- Alejano, 2012, Stability of granite dry-stone masonry retaining walls: analytical design, Géotechnique, 62, 1013, 10.1680/geot.10.P.112 · DOI
- Harkness, 2000, Numerical modelling of full-scale tests on drystone masonry retaining walls, Géotechnique, 50, 165, 10.1680/geot.2000.50.2.165 · DOI
- Powrie, 2002, Deformation and failure modes of drystone retaining walls, Géotechnique, 52, 435, 10.1680/geot.2002.52.6.435 · DOI
- Claxton, 2005, Rigid block distinct-element modeling of dry-stone retaining walls in plane strain, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE, 131, 381, 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(381) · DOI
- Oetomo, 2016, Modeling the 2D behavior of dry-stone retaining walls by a fully discrete element method, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 40, 1099, 10.1002/nag.2480 · DOI
- Radjai, 2009, Contact dynamics as a nonsmooth discrete element method, Mech. Mater., 41, 715, 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.028 · DOI
- Azéma, 2012, Nonlinear effects of particle shape angularity in sheared granular media, Phys. Rev. E, 86, 041301, 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.041301 · DOI
- Castro, 2017, Mechanical analysis of the dry stone walls built by the Incas, EPJ Web Conf. – Powders Grains 2017, 140, 06012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mader, C., Godde, P., Behl, M., Binder, C., Hägele, E., Isla, J., Leceta, F., Lyons, M., Marsh, E., Odenthal, R., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.3389/fearc.2024.1328315 · Cited by 18
Mader, C., Godde, P., Hägele, E., Lyons, M., Weber, A., Odenthal, R., Stryjski, P., Binder, C., Leceta, F., Isla, J., et al. (2025) · Geoarchaeology · doi:10.1002/gea.70002 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Castro, J., Vallejo, L. E., & Estrada, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Cultural Heritage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 232-237
- ISSN
- 1296-2074
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review