Cited by 5Archaeological Research and ProtectionArchaeology and Natural HistoryArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping and geospatial analysis of ancient terrace agricultural systems in lucanas province, peruvian andes, based on satellite imagery, high-resolution DSMs, and field surveys

Open access
Mader, Christian, Godde, Philipp, Hägele, Elena, Lyons, Mike, Weber, Ann‐Kristin, Odenthal, Rachel, Stryjski, Paul, Binder, Christoph, Leceta, Fernando, Isla, Johny, Reindel, Markus, Meister, Julia·2025·Geoarchaeology

Abstract

This paper presents a unique set of maps and geospatial data covering 16 ancient terrace agricultural systems in the upper part of the Río Grande de Nasca drainage. These systems are located on the western Andean flank (1200 and 3800 m asl), in the districts of Llauta, Laramate, and Ocaña in Lucanas province, Ayacucho region, southern Peru (14.5° S). Spanning various periods of the prehispanic era (1000 bce–1532 ce), only limited sections of these terraces are still in use today. Our field methods include archaeological, geomorphological, and drone surveys. The terrace systems were mapped using (1) satellite imagery and (2) high‐resolution Digital Surface Models (DSMs) within a Geographic Information System (GIS). The geospatial analysis and mapping results encompass parameters such as elevation range, terrace area, number and condition of terrace walls, length and height of terrace walls, area of individual terraced fields, associated architecture (e.g., irrigation canals), slope, current vegetation and use, and chronology. By documenting the widespread distribution, extent, and diversity of agricultural terraces in the region, this data set is extremely valuable for understanding prehispanic human‐environment interactions and land use dynamics, as well as indigenous agricultural practices and resilience strategies in response to environmental and climate change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gea.70002

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Atun R., 2020, Determining the Forest Fire Risk With Sentinel 2 Images, Turkish Journal of Geosciences, 1, 22
  2. Canziani J., 2021, Paisaje y territorio en el Perú
  3. Capriles J. M., 2016, The Archaeology of Andean Pastoralism
  4. Flores Ochoa J. A., 1986, Andenes y camellones en el Perú andino: Historia, presente y futuro, 85
  5. Isla J., 2017, The Andes: Geography, Diversity, and Sociocultural Impacts, 53
  6. Isla J., 2021, Wari: Nuevos aportes y perspectivas, 327
  7. Mader C., 2019, Sea Shells in the Mountains and Llamas on the Coast: The Economy of the Paracas Culture (800 to 200 BC) in Southern Peru
  8. Mader C., 2019, Excavated Worlds: 40 Years of Archaeological Research on Four Continents, 64
  9. Pulgar Vidal J., 1981, Geografía del Perú: Las ocho regiones naturales del Perú
  10. Reindel M., 2015, Paracas en Palpa: Los fundamentos del poder de la cultura Nasca, Peruvian Archaeology, 2, 37
  11. Soßna V., 2015, Climate and Settlement in Southern Peru: The Northern Río Grande de Nasca Drainage Between 1500 BCE and 1532 CE
  12. Torre C., 1986, Andenes y camellones en el Perú andino: Historia, presente y futuro

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mader, C., Godde, P., Hägele, E., Lyons, M., Weber, A., Odenthal, R., Stryjski, P., Binder, C., Leceta, F., Isla, J., Reindel, M., & Meister, J.
Affiliations
  • ArchDepth Research Group, Bonn Center for Dependency and Slavery Studies University of Bonn Bonn Germany
  • Geoarchaeology and Quaternary Science, Institute of Geography and Geology University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany
  • Department of Ancient American Studies and Ethnology, Institute of Archaeology and Cultural Anthropology University of Bonn Bonn Germany
  • Department of Christian Archaeology and Byzantine Art History University of Marburg Marburg Germany
  • Historical Mapping Laboratory, Espacio Interdisciplinario Universidad de la República Uruguay Montevideo C.P Uruguay
  • Nasca‐Palpa Management Plan, Peruvian Ministry of Culture Nasca Peru
  • Commission for Archaeology of Non‐European Cultures German Archaeological Institute Bonn Germany
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Meister, Julia
Venue
Geoarchaeology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-02-28
Volume
40
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0883-6353 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6548
OpenAlex
W4408384566
Cited by
5
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geoarchaeology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Archaeology and Natural History
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
terraced agriculture, Andean agriculture, irrigation canals, human-nature relationship, land use history, indigenous agriculture, climate change adaptation, digital surface model, satellite imagery, drone survey, archaeological mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review