Cited by 12Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Endometriosis: Current thinking

Arya, Pratibha, Shaw, Robert·2005·Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.curobgyn.2005.03.003

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arya, P., & Shaw, R.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Robert
Venue
Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
191-198
ISSN
0957-5847 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024176302
Cited by
12
References
12
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, etiopathogenesis, psychological impact, chronic pelvic pain, gynecological diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review