Cited by 29Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsECG Monitoring and Analysis

Changes in the digital health landscape in cardiac electrophysiology: a pre-and peri-pandemic COVID-19 era survey

Open access
Han, Janet K., Al-Khatib, Sana M., Albert, Christine M.·2021·Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal

Abstract

Background Digital health is transforming healthcare delivery. Objective To compare the current digital health landscape in select groups of cardiac electrophysiology (EP) professionals prior to and during the COVID-19 era. Methods Two online surveys were emailed to 4 Heart Rhythm Society communities and tweeted out to Twitter EP, 1 before and 1 during the pandemic. Categorical variables were analyzed using the χ 2 test and reported as absolute numbers and percentages. Results There were 253 pre-pandemic (S1) and 273 follow-up surveys (S2) completed. The majority of respondents to both surveys were male, aged <55 years (70.6% vs 75.1%), university-affiliated (52.6% vs 55%), and physicians (83.3% vs 87.9%). Between S1 and S2, routine use of video-telehealth increased (5.9% vs 58.6%; P < .001) for all types of consultations ( P < .001 for all). Wireless electrocardiogram prescribing was prevalent and similar (80.2% vs 81.0%), whereas wireless blood pressure monitoring (9.9% vs 18.3%) and wireless oximetry (1.6% vs 8.1%; P = .006 for both) prescribing both increased. For smartphone mobile applications (mApps), prescriptions for heart rate mApps decreased (50.6% vs 40.7%; P = .022), while vital sign (28.9% vs 37%; P = .04) and symptom trackers (15.8% vs 24.9%; P = .01) prescribing increased. A majority in both surveys (84.6% vs 75.5%) reported no workplace infrastructure or support for digital health with concerns for lack of parity in reimbursement. Conclusion Our results show an increase in adoption of digital health by EP during the COVID-19 pandemic. Concerns regarding a lack of supportive infrastructure persisted. Development of professional society guidelines on optimal clinical workflow, infrastructure, and reimbursement may help advance and sustain digital health integration in EP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.12.001

Cites

19 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations [Internet] 1st edition 1962 Free Press of Glencoe New York Available from https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/254636
  2. [9]Totten A. Hansen R. Wagner J. Telehealth for Acute and Chronic Care Consultations. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 216. (Prepared by Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2015-00009-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 19-EHC012-EF 2019 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD 31577401
  3. [21]Srinivasan M. Phadke A.J. Zulman D. Enhancing patient engagement during virtual care: a conceptual model and rapid implementation at an academic medical center [Internet]. NEJM Catalyst Innovative Care Delivery. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 20] Available from https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0262 · DOI
  4. [28]Artandi M. Thomas S. Shah N.R. Srinivasan M. Rapid System Transformation to More Than 75% Primary Care Video Visits within Three Weeks at Stanford: Response to Public Safety Crisis during a Pandemic [Internet]. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 6] Available from https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0100 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, J. K., Al-Khatib, S. M., & Albert, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Janet K.
Venue
Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
55-62
ISSN
2666-6936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3115341717
Cited by
29
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
digital health, cardiac electrophysiology, COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine, video telehealth, remote blood pressure monitoring, mobile health apps, mobile application, work facilities, physician attitudes, pre-pandemic vs pandemic comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review