CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A field experience of documentation and analysis through 3D mapping and surface survey in the Hualfín Valley (Catamarca, Argentina)

Lynch, Julieta, Parcero-Oubiña, César, Fábrega-Álvarez, Pastor·2020·Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
DOI 10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00145
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00145

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most of the fragments of objects documented at Villavil 2 belong to the PDR or Inka periods, only a few from the Formative, and none from the Middle period.

    “This coincides closely with the results of the collection of material culture at the site(Lynch et al. 2020), with most of the fragments of objects documented belonging to the PDR or Inka periods and only a few from the Formative and no materials at all from the Middle period.”

    From On the periphery of the inka empire: spatial arrangement at the pre-hispanic rock-art site of villavil 2 (catamarca, argentina) (2024) · cites this paper as Lynch et al. 2020

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Balesta, 2011, La configuración del paisaje Belén (valle de Hualfín, Catamarca), Revista Relaciones de la SAA, XXXVI, 149
  2. Campana, 2017, Drones in archaeology. State-of-the-art and future perspectives, Archaeol. Prospect., 24, 275, 10.1002/arp.1569 · DOI
  3. De Reu, 2014, On introducing an image-based 3D reconstruction method in archaeological excavation practice, J. Archaeol. Sci., 41, 251, 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.020 · DOI
  4. De Reu, 2012, Towards a three-dimensional cost-effective registration of the archaeological heritage, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40, 1108, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040 · DOI
  5. Doneus, 2011, From deposit to point cloud - a study of low-cost computer vision approaches for the straightforward documentation of archaeological excavations, Geoinformatics (XXIIIrd International CIPA Symposium), 6, 81
  6. Field, 2017, The utility of UAVs for archaeological surface survey: a comparative study, J. Archaeol. Sci.: Report, 13, 577
  7. Garstki, 2017, Virtual representation: the production of 3D digital artifacts, J. Archaeol. Method Theor, 24, 726, 10.1007/s10816-016-9285-z · DOI
  8. Hanus, 2018, Mapping the inhospitable landscapes of the orkney islands using RPAS, Archaeol. Prospect., 25, 89, 10.1002/arp.1582 · DOI
  9. Lynch, 2014, Sitio Villavil: una aproximación a la dinámica local-estatal al norte del valle de Hualfín, Catamarca, Intersecc. Antropol., 15, 491
  10. Lynch, 2015, Representaciones rupestres del sitio Villavil 2 (Valle de Hualfín, Catamarca, Argentina), Rev. Chil. Antropol., 32, 57
  11. Lynch, 2013, Ushnus of the Inca provincial region: an analysis of two ceremonial platforms from Inca sites in Catamarca (Argentina), J. Anthropol. Archaeol., 32, 97, 10.1016/j.jaa.2012.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lynch, 2016, Análisis de la tecnología lítica del sitio Villavil localizado en el valle de Hualfín (Provincia de Catamarca, Argentina), Rev. Española Antropol. Am., 46, 265
  13. Lynch, 2018, The study of rock art engravings through lithic technologies: the Villavil 2 site (hualfin valley, Catamarca, Argentina), Lithic Techonology, 43, 71, 10.1080/01977261.2018.1437978 · DOI
  14. Opitz, 2015, Recent developments in HDSM for archaeology: implications for practice and theory, Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 44, 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013845 · DOI
  15. Parcero-Oubiña, 2017, Ground to air and back again: archaeological prospection to characterize prehispanic agricultural practices in the high-altitude Atacama (Chile), Quat. Int., 435, 95, 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.050 · DOI
  16. Podestá, 2013, Poder y prestigio en los Andes centro-sur. Una visión a través de pinturas escutiformes en Guachipas (Noroeste Argentino), Boletín del Museo Chileno Arte Precolombino, 18, 63, 10.4067/S0718-68942013000200006 · DOI
  17. Remondino, 2011, Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning, Rem. Sens., 3, 1104, 10.3390/rs3061104 · DOI
  18. Seggiaro, 2014, Evolución tectónica andina entre las sierras de Hualfín, Capillitas y extremo sur de Aconquija, Catamarca, Revista Asociación Geológica Argentina, 71, 500
  19. Thomas, 2018, Some like it hot: the impact of next generation FLIR Systems thermal cameras on archaeological thermography, Archaeol. Prospect., 25, 81, 10.1002/arp.1588 · DOI
  20. Troncoso, 2004, El arte de la dominación: arte rupestre y paisaje durante el período incaico en la cuenca superior del río Aconcagüa, Chungará, 36, 453
  21. Verhoeven, 2011, Taking ComputerVision aloft - archaeological three-dimensional reconstructions from aerial photographs with PhotoScan, Archaeol. Prospect., 18, 67, 10.1002/arp.399 · DOI
  22. Verhoeven, 2012, Computer vision-based orthophoto mapping of complex archaeological sites: the ancient quarry of pitaranha (Portugal–Spain), Archaeometry, 54, 1114, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2012.00667.x · DOI
  23. Wynveldt, 2013, El paisaje tardío del Valle de Hualfín: una reconstrucción arqueológica desde los poblados protegidos, Comechingonia, 17, 191

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lynch, J., Parcero-Oubiña, C., & Fábrega-Álvarez, P.
ORCID
Venue
Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
17
Pages
e00145
ISSN
2212-0548
DOI
10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00145
Cited by
7
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (11220170100033)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review