Cited by 44Urban Design and Spatial AnalysisArchaeological Research and Protection3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A GIS of affordances: Movement and visibility at a planned colonial town in highland Peru

Wernke, Steven A., Kohut, Lauren E., Traslaviña, Abel·2017·Journal of Archaeological Science

Abstract

Archaeological GIS is moving towards increasingly detailed, embodied, multidimensional simulations and analyses of human experience in the past. Most of the emerging GIS research synthesizing spatial modeling and subject-centered approaches has been concerned with practices and perceptions of landscape. This paper tightens the analytical focus to the more intimate scale of a single settlement, combining models of movement and visual experience within a planned colonial town in highland Peru. Such a rendering is important, since controlling movement and visual experience were central to the colonial project that built this and other such towns in the Viceroyalty of Peru. This study centers on an exceptionally well-preserved, relict planned colonial town in highland Peru to investigate affordances of movement and visibility within it. Several GIS-based simulations and analytical techniques are brought together, including drone-based high resolution three dimensional modeling, spatial network analysis, walking models, and cumulative viewshed analysis, to simulate aggregate visual experience as people moved through the town. The results are suggestive of how the layout of the town specifically routed transit to facilitate the visual prominence of the church and original Inka plaza of the reducción, as well as the prominence of indigenous elite households. Both continuities and discontinuities of movement and visual experience relative to Inkaic and Spanish colonial spaces are evident. By extension, this paper also provides a pathway for quantitative and reproducible modeling of site-scale movement and visual affordances as dimensions of subject and community formation in other global contexts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2017.06.004

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Albó, 1972, Dinámica en la estructura intercomunitaria de jesús de machaca, Am. Indíg., 32, 773
  2. Schuetz-Miller, 2000, Survival of Early Christian Symbolism in Monastic Churches of New Spain and Visions of the Millennial Kingdom, J. Southwest, 42, 763
  3. Wernke, 2015, Building Tension. Dilemmas of the Built Environment through Inca and Spanish Rule.” Tribus (special edition) Perspectives on the Inca, 165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wernke, S. A., Kohut, L. E., & Traslaviña, A.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Tougaloo College (US)
Corresponding author
Wernke, Steven A.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
84
Pages
22-39
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2625156863
Cited by
43
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vanderbilt University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
colonial urbanism, movement simulation, visual experience, affordances, visibility analysis, spatial network analysis, walking model, 3D modeling, Viceroyalty of Peru, settlement layout, highland Peru, community formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review