Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consensus guidelines for lumbar puncture in patients with neurological diseases

Open access
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan, Niemantsverdriet, Ellis, Struyfs, Hanne, Blennow, Kaj, Brouns, Raf, Comabella, Manuel, Dujmovic, Irena, van der Flier, Wiesje, Frölich, Lutz, Galimberti, Daniela, Gnanapavan, Sharmilee, Hemmer, Bernhard, Hoff, Erik, Hort, Jakub, Iacobaeus, Ellen, Ingelsson, Martin, Jan de Jong, Frank, Jonsson, Michael, Khalil, Michael, Kuhle, Jens, Lleó, Alberto, de Mendonça, Alexandre, Molinuevo, José Luis, Nagels, Guy, Paquet, Claire, Parnetti, Lucilla, Roks, Gerwin, Rosa‐Neto, Pedro, Scheltens, Philip, Skårsgard, Constance, Stomrud, Erik, Tumani, Hayrettin, Visser, Pieter Jelle, Wallin, Anders, Winblad, Bengt, Zetterberg, Henrik, Duits, Flora, Teunissen, Charlotte E.·2017·Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
DOI 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebrospinal fluid collection by lumbar puncture (LP) is performed in the diagnostic workup of several neurological brain diseases. Reluctance to perform the procedure is among others due to a lack of standards and guidelines to minimize the risk of complications, such as post‐LP headache or back pain. Methods: We provide consensus guidelines for the LP procedure to minimize the risk of complications. The recommendations are based on (1) data from a large multicenter LP feasibility study (evidence level II‐2), (2) systematic literature review on LP needle characteristics and post‐LP complications (evidence level II‐2), (3) discussion of best practice within the Joint Programme Neurodegenerative Disease Research Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's Disease and Biomarkers for Multiple Sclerosis consortia (evidence level III). Results: Our consensus guidelines address contraindications, as well as patient‐related and procedure‐related risk factors that can influence the development of post‐LP complications. Discussion: When an LP is performed correctly, the procedure is well tolerated and accepted with a low complication rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.007

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Engelborghs, S., Niemantsverdriet, E., Struyfs, H., Blennow, K., Brouns, R., Comabella, M., Dujmovic, I., van der Flier, W., Frölich, L., Galimberti, D., Gnanapavan, S., Hemmer, B., Hoff, E., Hort, J., Iacobaeus, E., Ingelsson, M., Jan de Jong, F., Jonsson, M., Khalil, M., Kuhle, J., Lleó, A., de Mendonça, A., Molinuevo, J. L., Nagels, G., Paquet, C., Parnetti, L., Roks, G., Rosa‐Neto, P., Scheltens, P., Skårsgard, C., Stomrud, E., Tumani, H., Visser, P. J., Wallin, A., Winblad, B., Zetterberg, H., Duits, F., & Teunissen, C. E.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
111-126
ISSN
2352-8729 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.007
OpenAlex
W2615461910
Cited by
355
References
57
FWCI
16.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus guidelines for lumbar puncture in patients with neurological diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.007
The paper
Engelborghs, S., Niemantsverdriet, E., Struyfs, H., Blennow, K., Brouns, R., Comabella, M., Dujmovic, I., van der Flier, W., Frölich, L., Galimberti, D., Gnanapavan, S., Hemmer, B., Hoff, E., Hort, J., Iacobaeus, E., Ingelsson, M., Jan de Jong, F., Jonsson, M., Khalil, M., . . . Teunissen, C. E. (2017). Consensus guidelines for lumbar puncture in patients with neurological diseases. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2017.04.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.