Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,621

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease

Albert, Marilyn S., DeKosky, Steven T., Dickson, Dennis, Dubois, Bruno, Feldman, Howard H., Fox, Nick C., Gamst, Anthony, Holtzman, David M., Jagust, William J., Petersen, Ronald C., Snyder, Peter J., Carrillo, Maria C., Thies, Bill, Phelps, Creighton H.·2013·Focus

Abstract

The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association charged a workgroup with the task of developing criteria for the symptomatic predementia phase of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), referred to in this article as mild cognitive impairment due to AD. The workgroup developed the following two sets of criteria: (1) core clinical criteria that could be used by healthcare providers without access to advanced imaging techniques or cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and (2) research criteria that could be used in clinical research settings, including clinical trials. The second set of criteria incorporate the use of biomarkers based on imaging and cerebrospinal fluid measures. The final set of criteria for mild cognitive impairment due to AD has four levels of certainty, depending on the presence and nature of the biomarker findings. Considerable work is needed to validate the criteria that use biomarkers and to standardize biomarker analysis for use in community settings. (Reprinted with permission from Alzheimers Dement 2011;7(3):270–279)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.focus.11.1.96

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1097/01.JGP.0000221334.65330.55 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.3233/JAD-2006-9S341 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1001/archneur.62.2.192 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00530-1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/ana.20730 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1097/00002093-200307000-00010 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S1052-5149(03)00025-X · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.jalz.2005.11.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/brain/awm336 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/nrd3115 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 2,621

Metadata

Authors
Albert, M. S., DeKosky, S. T., Dickson, D., Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Fox, N. C., Gamst, A., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W. J., Petersen, R. C., Snyder, P. J., Carrillo, M. C., Thies, B., & Phelps, C. H.
Venue
Focus
Published
2013-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
96-106
ISSN
  • 1541-4094 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4108
OpenAlex
W2149862198
Cited by
2,621
References
9
FWCI
179.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.focus.11.1.96
The paper
Albert, M. S., DeKosky, S. T., Dickson, D., Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Fox, N. C., Gamst, A., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W. J., Petersen, R. C., Snyder, P. J., Carrillo, M. C., Thies, B., & Phelps, C. H. (2013). The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease. Focus. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.11.1.96

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.