Cited by 4Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Engagement in substance use disorder treatment after an emergency department visit among persons at high risk of opioid overdose: A prediction analysis

Open access
Bhondoekhan, Fiona, Li, Yu, Hallowell, Benjamin D., Mahoney, Linda, Daly, Mackenzie M., Goulet, Jamieson, Beaudoin, Francesca L., Chambers, Laura C. +1 more·2024·Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports

Abstract

Background: Certified peer recovery specialists (CPRS) and licensed clinical social workers (LCSWs) can facilitate substance use disorder (SUD) treatment engagement for emergency department (ED) patients at risk for overdose. Predictors of treatment engagement after such behavioral services are unknown. Methods: This secondary analysis included Rhode Island ED patients at high risk for opioid overdose participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of CPRS and LCSWs services (2018-2021). SUD treatment engagement within 90 days post-discharge was identified using statewide administrative data. Potential predictors were obtained from baseline questionnaires. Classification and regression trees (CART) were used to identify predictors of treatment engagement. Results: In the ED, 323 and 325 participants received CPRS and LCSWs services, respectively, among whom 141 (43.7 %) and 137 (42.2 %) engaged in SUD treatment within 90 days post-discharge. For the CPRS group, predictors of treatment engagement included unhealthy alcohol use, prescription opioid or benzodiazepine use in past 6 months, and lifetime history of: unstable housing, barriers to treatment, bipolar disorder diagnosis, addiction treatment, and recovery services. In the LCSW group, predictors included health insurance, current pain, opioid overdose in past year, and lifetime history of anxiety disorder diagnosis and mental illness treatment. However, CART had low predictive accuracy (CPRS: 60.9 %, LCSW: 54.8 %). Conclusions: Among ED patients at high risk of opioid overdose receiving behavioral services, 90-day SUD treatment engagement was high. Sociobehavioral and clinical patient characteristics did not accurately predict treatment engagement. Behavioral services should be offered to all ED patients at high risk of opioid overdose.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100287

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Co-occurring mental illness and mental health treatment can be used as avenues for substance use treatment.

    “Research has also shown that co-occurring mental illness and mental health treatment can be used as avenues for substance use treatment [13,19].”

    From Treatment Use Among U.S. Adults with a Substance Use Disorder: Associations with Symptom Severity, Problem Self-Perception, Comorbid Mental Illness, and Mental Health Treatment (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that managing co-occurring conditions, especially mental health conditions, is integral to linking patients to substance use disorder care. But it does not show that mental health treatment serves as an avenue into that care: in this study, the absence of prior mental illness treatment and mental health diagnoses predicted treatment engagement. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhondoekhan, F., Li, Y., Hallowell, B. D., Mahoney, L., Daly, M. M., Goulet, J., Beaudoin, F. L., Chambers, L. C., & Marshall, B. D. L.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Rhode Island Department of Health (US)
  • Rhode Island Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals (US)
Corresponding author
Marshall, Brandon D.L.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
13
Pages
100287
ISSN
2772-7246 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403309746
Cited by
4
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Arnold Ventures LLC
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
opioid overdose risk, emergency department patients, licensed clinical social workers, alcohol consumption, prescription opioid use, benzodiazepine use, unstable housing, barriers to treatment, mental illness, pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review