Cited by 49Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning Development

The developmental neuroscience of adolescence: revisiting, refining, and extending seminal models

Open access
Dahl, Ronald E.·2016·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahl, R. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Dahl, Ronald E.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
17
Pages
101-102
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2416733284
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
adolescence, developmental neuroscience, adolescent brain development, cognitive development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review