The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The structure of cognition in 9 and 10 year-old children and associations with problem behaviors: Findings from the ABCD study’s baseline neurocognitive battery
Open accessAbstract
The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study is poised to be the largest single-cohort long-term longitudinal study of neurodevelopment and child health in the United States. Baseline data on N= 4521 children aged 9-10 were released for public access on November 2, 2018. In this paper we performed principal component analyses of the neurocognitive assessments administered to the baseline sample. The neurocognitive battery included seven measures from the NIH Toolbox as well as five other tasks. We implemented a Bayesian Probabilistic Principal Components Analysis (BPPCA) model that incorporated nesting of subjects within families and within data collection sites. We extracted varimax-rotated component scores from a three-component model and associated these scores with parent-rated Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) internalizing, externalizing, and stress reactivity. We found evidence for three broad components that encompass general cognitive ability, executive function, and learning/memory. These were significantly associated with CBCL scores in a differential manner but with small effect sizes. These findings set the stage for longitudinal analysis of neurocognitive and psychopathological data from the ABCD cohort as they age into the period of maximal adolescent risk-taking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The study recruited children from schools throughout the United States based on stratified probability38 to match the demographic and socioeconomic diversity of the United States.39”
From Association of Demographic and Socioeconomic Indicators With the Use of Wearable Devices Among Children (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R
Buuren, S. V., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03 · Cited by 13,870
Stan : A Probabilistic Programming Language
Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Brubaker, M., Guo, J., Li, P., & Riddell, A. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v076.i01 · Cited by 7,754
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03203267 · Cited by 7,230
(2010) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 6,037
(2015) · doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 · Cited by 5,611
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411429458 · Cited by 3,944
Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis
Tipping, M. E., & Bishop, C. M. (1999) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00196 · Cited by 3,679
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- McKenna, 2017, Informing the structure of executive function in children: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 11, 154, 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00154 · DOI · Paper page
- Rubin, 2004, vol. 81
- Snellen, 1862, vol.1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The ABCD study: understanding the development of risk for mental and physical health outcomes
Karcher, N. R., & Barch, D. M. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0736-6 · Cited by 351
Self-citationMeaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study
Dick, A. S., Lopez, D. A., Watts, A. L., Heeringa, S. G., Reuter, C., Bartsch, H., Fan, C. C., Kennedy, D. N., Palmer, C. E., Marshall, A. T., et al. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118262 · Cited by 240
Self-citationMichelini, G., Barch, D. M., Tian, Y., Watson, D., Klein, D. N., & Kotov, R. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0593-4 · Cited by 171
Self-citationThe Challenges and Opportunities of Small Effects: The New Normal in Academic Psychiatry
Paulus, M. P., & Thompson, W. K. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4540 · Cited by 160
Self-citationRakesh, D., Seguin, C., Zalesky, A., Cropley, V., & Whittle, S. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.03.008 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, W. K., Barch, D. M., Bjork, J. M., Gonzalez, R., Nagel, B. J., Nixon, S. J., & Luciana, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Luciana, Monica
- ORCID
- Venue
- Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 100606
- ISSN
- 1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6676481
- OpenAlex
- W2904226249
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
- Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA041148, U01DA041106, 1U24DA041123-01, U01DA041120, U01 DA041156)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- cognitive structure, neuropsychological assessment, executive function, learning and memory, general intelligence, behavioral problems, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, stress reactivity, Child Behavior Checklist, Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, children aged 9-10, NIH Toolbox
- MeSH terms
- Problem Behavior, Adolescent, Brain, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neurocognitive Disorders, Adolescent Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
