The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Bridge” graphene oxide modified positive charged nanofiltration thin membrane with high efficiency for Mg2+/Li+ separation
Abstract
Abstract To improve the efficiency during the process of Mg2+/Li+ separation, a novel nanofiltration (NF) membrane was optimized by doping graphene oxide (GO) additives into the ultrafiltration (UF) base membrane. The effects of GO doping content on the morphology, structure and surface properties of UF membrane and the final NF membrane were studied comprehensively. The hydrophilic GO acted as a “bridge” between UF membrane and polyamide layer due to the “anchor effect”, which significantly enhanced the interaction between base membrane and polyamide layer. The results revealed that with ultra-low GO doping content of 0.05 wt%, the final NF005 membrane exhibited a high selective separation capacity for Mg2+ and Li+ (SMg,Li≈0.062), and the flux increased by about 119% compared with the pure NF0 membrane. Additionally, due to the high stability of membrane, the excellent separation capacity of NF005 membrane only changed slightly after 7-day cycle filtration test. Importantly, a small amount of GO doping greatly improved the permeability of both UF and NF membranes, which correspondingly improved the separation efficiency and accelerated the filtration rate. This work provides a new direction for designing membrane with high efficiency for Mg2+/Li+ separation, which is potential in the field of lithium extraction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Membrane-based technologies for lithium recovery from water lithium resources: A review
Li, X., Mo, Y., Qing, W., Shao, S., Tang, C. Y., & Li, J. (2019) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117317 · Cited by 756
Extraction of lithium with functionalized lithium ion-sieves
Xu, X., Chen, Y., Wan, P., Gasem, K., Wang, K., He, T., Adidharma, H., & Fan, M. (2016) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.09.004 · Cited by 536
Novel approaches for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines: A review
Liu, G., Zhao, Z., & Ghahreman, A. (2019) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.05.005 · Cited by 465
Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Sun, W., Hu, Y., & Tang, H. (2020) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.09.002 · Cited by 344
Separation of magnesium and lithium from brine using a Desal nanofiltration membrane
Sun, S.-Y., Cai, L.-J., Nie, X.-Y., Song, X., & Yu, J.-G. (2015) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.06.012 · Cited by 306
Swain, B. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.4976 · Cited by 282
Review on the Electrochemical Extraction of Lithium from Seawater/Brine
Zhao, X., Yang, H., Wang, Y., & Sha, Z. (2019) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113389 · Cited by 199
Separating Lithium and Magnesium in Brine by Aluminum-Based Materials
Liu, X., Zhong, M., Chen, X., & Zhao, Z. (2018) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.01.005 · Cited by 153
Cited by
Extraction of lithium from Chinese salt-lake brines by membranes: Design and practice
Xu, S., Song, J., Bi, Q., Chen, Q., Zhang, W.-M., Qian, Z., Zhang, L., Xu, S., Tang, N., & He, T. (2021) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119441 · Cited by 462
Zhao, Y., Tong, T., Wang, X., Lin, S., Reid, E. M., & Chen, Y. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c04593 · Cited by 363
A review on lithium recovery using electrochemical capturing systems
Zavahir, S., Elmakki, T., Gulied, M., Ahmad, Z., Al-Sulaiti, L., Shon, H. K., Chen, Y., Park, H., Batchelor, B., & Han, D. S. (2021) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2020.114883 · Cited by 220
Lu, D., Ma, T., Lin, S., Zhou, Z., Li, G., An, Q., Yao, Z., Sun, Q., Sun, Z., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119504 · Cited by 213
Nikkhah, H., Ipekçi, D., Xiang, W., Stoll, Z., Xu, P., Li, B., McCutcheon, J. R., & Beykal, B. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.155349 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, P., Hong, J., Qian, X., Xu, Z., Xia, H., & Ni, Q.-Q.
- Venue
- Desalination
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 488
- Pages
- 114522
- ISSN
- 0011-9164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3028281054
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Bridge” graphene oxide modified positive charged nanofiltration thin membrane with high efficiency for Mg2+/Li+ separation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114522
- The paper
- Xu, P., Hong, J., Qian, X., Xu, Z., Xia, H., & Ni, Q.-Q. (2020). “Bridge” graphene oxide modified positive charged nanofiltration thin membrane with high efficiency for Mg2+/Li+ separation. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
