The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Designers Think
Abstract
How Designers Think is based on Bryan Lawson's many observations of designers at work, interviews with designers and their clients and collaborators. This extended work is the culmination of forty years' research and shows the belief that we all can, and do, design, and that we can learn to design better. The creative mind continues to have the power to surprise and this book aims to nurture and extend this creativity. Neither the earlier editions, nor this book, are intended as authoritative prescriptions of how designers should think but provide helpful advice on how to develop an understanding of design.In this fourth edition, Bryan Lawson continues to try and understand how designers think, to explore how they might be better educated and to develop techniques to assist them in their task. Some chapters have been revised and three completely new chapters added. The book is now intended to be read in conjunction with What Designers Know which is a companion volume. Some of the ideas previously discussed in the third edition of How Designers Think are now explored more thoroughly in What Designers Know. For the first time this fourth edition works towards a model of designing and the skills that collectively constitute the design process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response
Bloch, P. H. (1995) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299505900302 · Cited by 1,920
Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures
Johansson‐Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12023 · Cited by 1,163
Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement
Bloch, P. H., Brunel, F. F., & Arnold, T. J. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/346250 · Cited by 787
Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment
Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., & Elmquist, M. (2016) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12153 · Cited by 625
Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research
Höök, K., & Löwgren, J. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2362364.2362371 · Cited by 540
Metadata
- Authors
- Lawson, B.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2006-08-11
- OpenAlex
- W1509119510
- Cited by
- 1,584
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 107.52
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Designers Think. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780080454979
- The paper
- Lawson, B. (2006). How Designers Think. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080454979
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.